Metaphor and Rhetoric in Chinese and Bangladeshi Folk Discourse: A Cognitive-Cultural Comparative Study

Authors

Md. Fasiur Rahman

College of Foreign Language and cultures, Chengdu University of Technology, Erqianqiao #1, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059 (China)

Chen Xue

College of Foreign Language and cultures, Chengdu University of Technology, Erqianqiao #1, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059 (China)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700591

Subject Category: Language

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 8632-8646

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-26

Accepted: 2026-07-31

Published: 2026-08-08

Abstract

Folk discourse, which includes proverbs, folktales, and traditional sayings, is an important source of cultural knowledge. This paper is concerned with a comparative analysis of the metaphorical expressions in Bangladeshi folk language in comparison to their counterparts in Chinese in the cognitive linguistics framework. The study is based on two theoretical frameworks, namely, Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980) and Cultural Conceptualization Theory (Sharifian, 2011), which are used to explore the conceptualization of abstract concepts of life, morality, emotions, and fate within both cultures. Stratified random sampling resulted in 200 folk texts (100 per culture); a mixed-methods approach was used to compare metaphorical patterns, and Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (Version 26.0). The MIPVU procedure was used in a systematic manner to identify the metaphors. Results show universal cognitive patterns, as well as culture-specific patterns, which are a reflection of different culture-based philosophies, religions, and social systems. Chinese folk discourse is an expression of the Confucian and Taoist values, which focus on the harmony of society and moral development, and uses metaphors based on social hierarchy and nature images. Bangladeshi folk discourse is a mixture of the influence of Hindu, Buddhist, and Islamic beliefs with a main emphasis on spirituality, karmic aspects, the divine will, and the practice of the individual. The study highlighted a framework of cross-cultural metaphor analysis called Cognitive-Cultural Mapping. The implication of the findings is of great importance to translation studies, language pedagogy, and intercultural communication.

Keywords

Conceptual metaphor, folk discourse, Chinese culture, Bangladeshi culture, cognitive linguistics, cross-cultural communication

Downloads

References

1. Bryce, T. G. K., & Blown, E. J. (2024). Ausubel’s meaningful learning re-visited. Current Psychology, 43(5), 4579–4598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04440-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chen, C., & Wen, X. (2025). What does water mean to us: Water metaphors and metonymies in Chinese and English idioms. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00234.che [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Finnegan, R. (2012a). Oral Literature in Africa (1st ed.). Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Finnegan, R. (2012b). Oral Literature in Africa (1st ed.). Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kövecses, Z. (2008). Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.6.08kov [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mahbub, E. (2024). UNRAVELING BANGLADESH’S CULTURAL EVOLUTION IN THE LIGHT OF ITS ISLAMIC MIDDLE AGES: BRIDGING HISTORIES. Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.55327/jaash.v10i1.319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mieder, W. (2004). Proverbs: A handbook (1. publ). Greenwood. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rahman, M. H., & Rahman, Md. M. (2025). Symbolism and Cultural Pluralism in Bangladeshi Folk Art: Imaginaries and Expressions of Nationhood. American Journal of Tourism and Hospitality, 3(1), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajth.v3i1.5978 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shahed, S. M. (1993). Bengali Folk Rhymes: An Introduction. Asian Folklore Studies, 52(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.2307/1178454 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural Conceptualisations and Language: Theoretical framework and applications (Vol. 1). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural Linguistics: Cultural Conceptualisations and language (Vol. 8). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU (Vol. 14). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zachariadis, M., Scott, S., & Barrett, M. (2013). Methodological Implications of Critical Realism for Mixed-Methods Research1. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 855–879. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles