Metaphoric Imaging of the Post-Human Future in Afrofuturistic Discourse

Authors

Novikova V. P.

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department Foreign Languages of the K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (FCU). Moscow (Russia)

Faasema Ngutor Ezekiel

2nd Year Masters Student, School of Foreign Languages, National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Moscow (Russia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400493

Subject Category: Linguistics

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 6888-6910

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-22

Accepted: 2026-04-27

Published: 2026-05-15

Abstract

This article presents a linguistically oriented investigation of how images of the climate-changed future are constructed in African climate fiction (cli-fi), focusing on Nnedi Okorafor’s Noor and Alistair Mackay’s It Doesn’t Have to Be This Way. While both novels are frequently examined within speculative, postcolonial, and environmental literary studies, this article approaches them primarily as discursive artefacts through which futurity is linguistically assembled. It argues that posthuman and Afrofuturist futures are not merely represented thematically but are produced through patterned language use that shapes spatial perception, temporal orientation, ecological relationships, and embodied agency.
Drawing on Critical Discourse Analysis, eco-linguistics, narrative stylistics, and pragmatics, the study demonstrates how metaphor, modality, pronoun choice, naming practices, and evaluative stance collectively construct a coherent image of the cli-fi future. In Noor, futurity is linguistically framed as a hostile yet navigable terrain through techno-organic metaphors, declarative syntax, and culturally grounded bilingual lexicons that position technological embodiment as adaptive agency. In contrast, It Doesn’t Have to Be This Way presents the future as fragile, relational, and collectively negotiated through eco-metaphorical imagery, modal uncertainty, and inclusive discourse patterns. Across both novels, cultural referencing operates as a stabilising linguistic strategy that sustains continuity between ancestral epistemologies and speculative futures. By foregrounding the discursive construction of futurity, this article contributes to cli-fi scholarship by demonstrating that African posthuman futures are linguistically imaged, culturally sustained, and ecologically embedded.

Keywords

Posthumanism, Afrofuturism, Africanfuturism, Climate Fiction (Cli-Fi), Eco-linguistics, Critical Discourse Analysis, Futurity

Downloads

References

1. Andimba, S.S.K. (2017). Analysing the environment in verse: An ecocritical study of Julia Amukoshi’s Tales of the Rainbow: A collection of poetry in English and Anneli Nghikembua’s A True me in Words: An anthology of poems. (Master’s thesis, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia). Retrieved from http://repository.unam.edu.na/handle/11070/1927 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bloom, D. (2013). Cli-fi: Climate change fiction. Climate-Crisis Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bracke, A., & Corporaal, M. (2010). Ecocriticism and the English studies: An introduction. English Studies, 91(7), 709-712. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. DeMott, N. (2018). A brief history of ecocriticism: Where literature and the environment cross paths. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@Nick_DeMott/a-brief-history-of ecocriticism-a120614d30fc [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fenn, V. (2015). Roots of ecocriticism: An exploration of the history of ecocriticism, a literary theory of the post-modern world. Journal of English Language and Literature, 2(2), 114-119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Garrard, G. (2012). Ecocriticism (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gode, L. (2021). Climate change in fiction: The evolution and challenges of environmental apocalyptic literature (Publication No. 2583) [Senior thesis, Claremont McKenna College]. Scholarship@Claremont. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2583 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Goodbody, A. (2020). Beyond communication: Climate change fiction. In D. Holmes & L. Richardson (Eds.), Research handbook on communicating climate change (pp. 320–329). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gladwin, D. (2017). Ecocriticism. Retrieved from http://doi: 10.1093/obo/9780190221911 0014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Halliday, M. A. K. (2001). New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In A. Fill & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment (pp. 175–202). London: Continuum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Irr, C. (2017). “Climate fiction in English.” Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/35288142/Climate_Fiction_in_English [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Johns-Putra, A. (2015). How “cli-fi” novels humanise the science of climate change – and leading authors are getting in on the act. Retrieved from https://world.edu/cli-fi 151 novels-humanise-the-science-of-climate-change-and-leading-authors-are-getting-in on-the-act [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kandemiri, C.M. (2018). A post-colonial ecocritical analysis of selected African texts: A case of Lessing’s The Grass is Singing and Mungoshi’s Waiting for the Rain. (Master’s thesis, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia). Retrieved from http://repository.unam.edu.na/handle/11070/2231 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mackay, A. (2022). It Doesn’t Have to Be This Way. Jonathan Ball Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Marland, P. (2013). Ecocriticism. Literature Compass, 10(11), 846-868. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. (2010). Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 97–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Okoroafor, N. (2021). Noor. DAW Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pasi, J.S. (2012). Theorising the environment in fiction: An ecocritical reading of Jairos Kangira’s The Bundle of Firewood. Journal for Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 180-190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sahu, G. (2014). Ecocriticism – understanding the relationship between literature and environment in Indian English novels. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wright, L. (2019). Cli-fi: Environmental literature for the Anthropocene. In S. Baumbach & B. Neumann (Eds.), New approaches to the twenty-first-century Anglophone novel (pp. 99–116). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32598-5_6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles