Microenterprises Social Media Product Information and Its Impact on Consumer Information Adoption and Purchase Decision in Malaysia

Authors

Nurashikin Nazer Mohamed

Faculty of Economics, Business, and Accounting, i-CATS University College, Sarawak (Malaysia)

Nur Suriayanti Gadiman

Faculty of Economics, Business, and Accounting, i-CATS University College, Sarawak (Malaysia)

Kedani Ganie

Faculty of Economics, Business, and Accounting, i-CATS University ColFaculty of Economics, Business, and Accounting, i-CATS University College, Sarawaklege, Sarawak (Malaysia)

Khairunnisa Ibrahim

Faculty of Economics, Business, and Accounting, i-CATS University College, Sarawak (Malaysia)

Faizul Ayupp Dino

Faculty of Economics, Business, and Accounting, i-CATS University College, Sarawak (Malaysia)

John Francis Belen

Faculty of Economics, Business, and Accounting, i-CATS University College, Sarawak (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400325

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 4474-4484

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-15

Accepted: 2026-04-20

Published: 2026-05-08

Abstract

This study examines the influence of microenterprises’ social media product information on consumer information adoption and purchase intention in Malaysia. Drawing on the Information Adoption Model, the study proposes that information credibility, information quality, and information usefulness influence consumers’ adoption of product information, which subsequently affects purchase intention. A quantitative research design was employed, and data were collected through an online questionnaire distributed to consumers in Malaysia who actively search for product information on microenterprises’ social media platforms. A total of 388 valid responses were analysed using Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. The findings reveal that information credibility, information quality, and information usefulness all have significant positive effects on information adoption. Among these factors, information usefulness emerged as the strongest predictor. The results further indicate that information adoption has a significant positive effect on purchase intention. The proposed model explained 81% of the variance in information adoption and 62% of the variance in purchase intention. This study contributes to the literature by extending the Information Adoption Model to the context of microenterprises and social media marketing in Malaysia. The findings also provide practical implications for microenterprises by highlighting the importance of providing credible, high-quality, and useful product information to enhance consumer engagement and purchase intention.

Keywords

microenterprises, information credibility, information quality

Downloads

References

1. Abdul-Rahim, R., Bohari, S. A., Aman, A., & Awang, Z. (2022). Benefit–risk perceptions of fintech adoption for sustainability from bank consumers’ perspective: The moderating role of fear of COVID-19. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Awang, Z. (2015). SEM Made Simple: A gentle approach to learning structural equation modelling. In MPWS Rich Publication (Vol. 1, Issue 3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Awang, Z., Hui, L. S., & Zainudin, N. F. (2018). Pendekatan mudah sem- structural equation modelling [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aziz, N. N. A., Halim, R. ., & Wahid, N. . (2017). Networking and innovation performance in microenterprise in Malaysia. Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7374–7377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bao, Z., & Zhu, Y. (2025). Understanding online reviews adoption in social network communities: an extension of the information adoption model. Information Technology and People, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2022-0158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bukhari, S. F. H., Woodside, F. M., Hassan, R., Hussain, S., & Khurram, S. (2022). Exploring the motives behind the purchase of western imported food products. A phenomenological study from a Muslim-dominated region. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2020-0139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, X., Li, Y., Davison, R. M., & Liu, Y. (2021). The impact of imitation on Chinese social commerce buyers’ purchase behavior: The moderating role of uncertainty. International Journal of Information Management, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2007). Information adoption in an online discussion forum. ICE-B 2007 - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on e-Business. https://doi.org/10.5220/0002110703220328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chih, W. H., Hsu, L. C., & Ortiz, J. (2020). The antecedents and consequences of the perceived positive eWOM review credibility. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 120(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2019-0573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Daowd, A., Hasan, R., Eldabi, T., Rafi-ul-Shan, P. M., Cao, D., & Kasemsarn, N. (2020). Factors affecting eWOM credibility, information adoption and purchase intention on Generation Y: a case from Thailand. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2019-0118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Della Corte, V., Iavazzi, A., & D’Andrea, C. (2015). Customer involvement through social media: The cases of some telecommunication firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0011-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2018). Social media or shopping websites? The influence of eWOM on consumers’ online purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2016.1184706 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Felix, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., & Hinsch, C. (2017). Elements of strategic social media marketing: A holistic framework. Journal of Business Research, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Filieri, R. (2015). What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM. Journal of Business Research, 68(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Filieri, R., & McLeay, F. (2013). Online consumer reviews why do we adopt them? Academy of Marketing Annual Conference 2013: Marketing Relevance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hashim, N. A., Nor, S. M., & Janor, H. (2016). Riding the waves of social commerce : An empirical study of Malaysian entrepreneurs. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hassan, S., & Shahzad, A. (2022). The impact of social media usage on small and micro social commerce enterprises in Malaysia. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.64534/commer.2022.119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hussain, S., Ahmed, W., Jafar, R. M. S., Rabnawaz, A., & Jianzhou, Y. (2017). eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer’s information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ismail, S., Awi, N. A., Mohamed, M., Yusof, Y. M., Saputra, J., & Thurasamy, R. (2021). Investigating the structural relationship of mass media on attitude, social influence, product safety and its impact on purchase behaviour of herbal product in malaysia. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.8.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jiang, G., Liu, F., Liu, W., Liu, S., Chen, Y., & Xu, D. (2021). Effects of information quality on information adoption on social media review platforms: moderating role of perceived risk. Data Science and Management, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2021.02.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kahar, R., Yamimi, F., Bunari, G., & Habil, H. (2012). Trusting the social media in small business. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kanagal, N. (2016). An Extended Model of Behavioural Process in Consumer Decision Making. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v8n4p87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Khoa, B. T. (2021). Effect of information on online purchase intention: An extension of information acceptance model. 2021 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application, DASA 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA53625.2021.9682229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lee, H. M., Kang, J. W., & Namkung, Y. (2021). Instagram users’ information acceptance process for food-content. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052638 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mamun, A. Al, Nawi, N. B. C., Permarupan, P. Y., & Muniady, R. (2018). Sources of competitive advantage for Malaysian micro-enterprises. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-05-2017-0037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mohamed, N. N., Jaafar, N., & Ayupp, K. (2023). The mediating effect of information adoption on the association between social media influencer information credibility and purchase intention. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i1/15920 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mohamed N, N., & Jaafar, N (2026). The Influence of YouTube influencer attributes on information credibility and purchase intention in Malaysia: The mediating effect of consumer information adoption. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 28(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ngo, T. T. A., Vuong, B. L., Le, M. D., Nguyen, T. T., Tran, M. M., & Nguyen, Q. K. (2024). The impact of eWOM information in social media on the online purchase intention of Generation Z. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2316933 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Park, J. Y., Sung, C. S., & Im, I. (2017). Does social media use influence entrepreneurial opportunity? A review of its moderating role. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091593 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Pillay, S. (2021). The influence of electronic word-of-mouth adoption on brand love amongst generation z consumers. Acta Commercii, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v21i1.928 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rahaman, M. A., Hassan, H. M. K., Al Asheq, A., & Islam, K. M. A. (2022). The interplay between eWOM information and purchase intention on social media: Through the lens of IAM and TAM theory. PLoS ONE, 17(9 September). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Shrafat, F., Zeglat, D., Ensour, W., & Sarhan, N. M. (2021). Analysis of the factors that influence adoption of information from managerial responses to negative electronic word-of-mouth. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2021.117639 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Silaban, P. H., Chen, W. K., Sormin, S., Yehezkiel, Y. N., & Silalahi, A. D. K. (2023). How does electronic word of mouth on Instagram affect travel behaviour in Indonesia: A perspective of the information adoption model. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2163525 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Song, B. L., Liew, C. Y., Sia, J. Y., & Gopal, K. (2021). Electronic word-of-mouth in travel social networking sites and young consumers’ purchase intentions: an extended information adoption model. Young Consumers, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2021-1288 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sussman, S. W., & Siegal, W. S. (2003). Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information Systems Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.1.47.14767 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Widodo, T., & Salamah, A. H. M. P. (2023). The effect of e-wom on purchase intention mediated by information usefulness and information adoption (a study on skintific products). Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 4(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Xu, W., Sun, J., Ma, J., & Du, W. (2016). A personalized information recommendation system for R&D project opportunity finding in big data contexts. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zanjabila, Z., ... S., Yudhiantoro, D., Suryono, I. A., & Amajida, A. (2023). The Influences of Social Media Marketing, E-Wom, and Information Quality on Purchasing Decisions through Trust as The Mediation. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 06(04). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i4-39 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zhou, H., & Li, S. (2017). The impact of online additional comments on consumers’ information adoption. Sociology Mind, 07(02). https://doi.org/10.4236/sm.2017.72005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles