Mobility and Relational Connectivities on Access to Urban Agriculture Among Residents of Informal Settlement in Eldoret City, Kenya

Authors

Dr. Fredrick Okoth Okaka

Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Moi University (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700574

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 8372-8387

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-19

Accepted: 2026-07-24

Published: 2026-08-07

Abstract

Urban agriculture has emerged as an important means of survival for many. It is not only a means of improving household food security and nutrition, but also a source of income, employment and a means to social and economic empowerment especially for urban poor. However, it has been characterized by restrictive policies and practices prevalent in many urban areas in Africa as well as limited access. Mobility has been identified as an important factor in mediating access to livelihood for individuals and for their households. However, the role of mobility in shaping access and functioning of urban agriculture has received tangential treatment in urban agriculture research. On the other hand, interpersonal relationships and social networks are central to promoting access to livelihood activities. Nevertheless, there is dearth of information on how relational connectivities impact on access and participation in urban agriculture. This study was intended to offer important insights into understanding the dynamics of how mobility and relational connectivities are integral to urban faming as a livelihood option to urban residents. The theoretical perspective that guided this study was the social practice theory. The research was conducted through a survey method using concurrent mixed method approach. Data were collected using questionnaire, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and direct observation. The study participants were drawn from three purposively selected informal settlements in Eldoret City that is, Langas, Huruma and Munyaka. The study generated both quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Chi-square was used to determine the relationship between gender and the influence of mobility in access to urban farming. Qualitative data were transcribed and analyzed deductively through themes. The results revealed that mobility plays an import role in access to farming space mainly through enabling connection to or reaching the person/people who enabled acquisition of the farming space, providing the means or platform to reach and locate the farming space and obtaining information on the availability of the farming space. The results of the study further revealed that gender had no significant influence on mobility impact on access to farming space. In terms of access to market, the results of the study showed that mobility influenced access to the market for farm produce mainly through the connection to the people who help the urban farmer get market for their products, aided their ability to locate and reach the market and helped in obtaining information on where to sell the farm products. It also aided in obtaining agricultural technologies and innovations by the farmers. Finally, the results revealed that interpersonal relationships and social networks (relational connectivities) are central to promoting access and participation in urban farming mainly through family relationship and friendship ties. This study highlights the importance of human mobility and relational connectivities in advancing urban farming particularly among poor urban dwellers.

Keywords

Mobility, relational connectivities, urban farming, Eldoret, informal settlements

Downloads

References

1. Amirtahmasebi, R. (2008). “Food urbanism: Urban agriculture as a strategy to facilitate social mobility in informal settlements”. Master Theisi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ayuya, O. I. (2024). Ethnicity, social connectedness, and the rural–urban food continuum: Food security among urban informal settlement dwellers in Kenya. Heliyon, 10(9), e30481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Azunre, G. A., Amponsah, O., Peprah, C., Takyi, S. A., & Braimah, I. (2019). A review of the role of urban agriculture in the sustainable city discourse. Cities, 93, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beaman, L. and Dillon, A. (2018). Diffusion of agricultural information within social network: Evidence on gender inequalities from Mali. J.Dev.Econ. 133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bryceson, D.F., Maunder, D.A.C., Mbara, T.C., Kibombo, R., Davis, A.S.C. and Howe, J.D.G. (2003). Sustainable livelihoods, mobility and access needs. TRID [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cashman. K. (2018). “Community gardening in Mathare, Nairobi: Opportunities to improve food security and the rights to the city”. Technische Universitat, Berlin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cassidy, L. and Barness, G.D. (2012). Understanding household connectivity and resilience in marginal communities through social network analysis in the villages of Habu, Botswana. Ecol. Soc. 17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Crush, J., & Battersby, J. (Eds.). (2016). Rapid urbanisation, urban food deserts and food security in Africa. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43567-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dreier, O. (2008). Learning in structures of social practice. In S. Brinkmann, C. Elmholdt, G. Kraft, P. Musaeus, K. Nielsen, & L. Tanggaard (Eds.), A qualitative stance: Essays in honor of Steinar Kvale (pp. 85–96). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fisher, A. A., Laing, J. E., Stoeckel, J. E., & Townsend, J. W. (1998). Handbook for family planning operations research design (2nd ed.). Population Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Foeken, D., & Owuor, S. O. (2006). The crops. In D. Foeken (Ed.), To subsidise my income: Urban farming in an East-African Town (pp. 49–65). Brill [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2007). The state of food and agriculture: Paying farmers for environmental services. Rome, Italy: FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Githugunyi, D. K. (2014). An assessment of the contribution of urban agriculture to households' livelihoods in Roysambu Ward, Nairobi County (Master's thesis, Kenyatta University). Kenyatta University Institutional Repository [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kago, J. (2022). Mobility patterns and their impact on urban-rural linkages in small and intermediate twons in Kenya: A focus on the milk value chain. Geography. Universite` Michel de Montaigne-Boardeaux III. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lodin, J.B., Tegbaru, A., Bullock, R., Degrande, A., Nkengla, L.W. and Gaya, H.I. (2019). Gendered mobilities and immobilities: Women’s and men’s capacities for agricultural innovation in Kenya and Nigeria. Gender, Place & Culture. 26 (12), 1759-1783. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Luo, M., Kim, E.-K., Weibel, R., Martin, M., & Röcke, C. (2023). GPS-derived daily mobility and daily well-being in community-dwelling older adults. Gerontology, 69(7), 875–887. https://doi.org/10.1159/000527827 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mørck, L. L. (2010). Expansive learning as production of community. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 109(1), 176–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mugenda, O. M., and Mugenda, A. G. (2003).Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Muskat, M., Blackman, D., and Muskat, B. (2012). Mixed methods: Combining expert interviews, cross-impact analysis and scenario dDevelopment.The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 10(1), 9-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nosratabadi, S., Khazami, N., Ben Abdallah, M., Lakner, Z., Shamshirband, S., Mosavi, A., & Makó, C. (2020). Social capital contributions to food security: A comprehensive literature review. Foods, 9(11), 1650. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111650 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nigus, G., Ketema, M., Haji, J., & Sileshi, M. (2024). Determinants of adoption of urban agricultural practices in eastern Haraghe zone of Oromia region and Dire Dawa City Administration, eastern Ethiopia. Heliyon, 10(4), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ogendi, M. N., Mukundi, J. B., & Onyango, O. M. (2019). Type and distribution of urban and peri-urban agriculture production technologies in Nairobi County, Kenya. African Journal of Horticultural Science, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Omondi, S., Oluoch-Kosura, W., & Jirström, M. (2017). The role of urban-based agriculture on food security: Kenyan case studies. Geographical Research, 55(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Simiyu, R.W.R. (2012). “I don’t tell my husband about vegetable sales”. Gender aspects of urban agriculture in Eldoret, Kenya. Leiden, Netherlands; African Studies Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sultana,R., Birtchnell, T. and Gill, N.J. (2020). Urban greening and mobility justice in Dhaka’s informal settlement. Research Online. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Tuffour, M. (2023). Urbanization, land scarcity and urban farmers’ mobility: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of regional and City Planning. 34 (1): 83-100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. UNDP. (1996). Urban Agriculture: Food, Jobs and Sustainable Cities. In United Nations Development Program, Publication Series for Habitat II; UNDP: New York, NY, USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, Q., Wang, J., Sannigrahi, S., Bilsborrow, R., Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D., Li, J. and Song, C. (2021). Role of social networks in building livelihood resilience under payments for ecosystem services in poor rural community in China. Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles