Model Development of Learning Material: Subject of Customary Law

This study aims to describe the results on the Customary Law subject in the Civics Education Program using the Research & Development approach in the first year, namely the first step to the seventh step as UT new model of learning material development. This study is also conducted to produce products in the form of prototypes of UT learning materials and learning strategies that follow the characteristics of UT students, namely conventional, blended, and fully online approaches. This study applies the R&D approach and modifies it into a combination model of Gall and Borg, which includes fifteen steps with a three-year-period study or a multi-year study. The first year of study is the first step to the seventh step, the second year is the eighth step (product development), and the third year covers the ninth step to the fifteenth step. The technique of collecting data is carried out through FGD activities, which are attended by experts about Customary Law, instructional design experts, web design experts, stakeholders, and UT tutors. Data analysis is carried out through qualitative descriptive analysis.
The results of the study of Customary Law subjects show, as follows: (1) the number of students who take the subject in semester 2018.1 is 184 persons, 2018.2 is 164 persons, 2019.1 is 178 persons, and 2019.2 is 197 persons. (2) The number of students registered in the online tutorial (Tuton) semester 2018.1 is 55 students, 2018.2 is 44 students, 2019.1 is 32 students, and 2019.2 is 43 students. (3) The number of students who are active in Tuton implementation, semester 2018.1 is 30 students, 2018.2 is 29 students, 2019.1 is 17 students, and semester 2019.2 is 27 students. (4) The average result of Tuton's scores in semester 2018.1 is 32.83, semester 2018.2 is 36.73, semester 2019.1 is 36.67, and semester 2019.2 is 35.83. The contribution of Tuton's score to the final grade of the subject is 50%.
Besides producing the results of the first year of study, it also produces development products in the form of (1)learning objectives, competencies that are expected to be achieved by students at the end of the lecture, (2)general instructional objectives into specific competencies that are arranged logically and systematically between one another and end on general instructional objectives, (3)the results of student analysis on the characteristics of students related to their learning abilities as UT students, (4)the results of the context analysis produce a description of the availability of student learning facilities and infrastructure, resulting in specific learning objectives that contain the performance that students are expected to achieve at the end of the lesson, (5) an assessment instrument to be used in measuring student learning outcomes, (6) an instructional strategy for Customary Law that follows the instructional objectives of the subject.

Research and Development, Instructional Objectives

1. Arno A. Bellack and Herbert M. Kliebard (1977). Curriculum And Evaluation. California: Dutrhan, Bates, A. (2005).Technology, e-Learning and Distance Education London/New York: Routledge, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Belawati. (2015). Global Open Movement dalam Universitas Terbuka di Era Informasi. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka, Benny A. Pribadi. (2010), Pendekatan Konstruktivistik dan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Pada Sistem Pendidikan Jarak Jauh. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh, Volume 11, Nomor 2, September 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Branch, Robert Maribe (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach, New York: Springer Daniel L. Stufflebeam (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Application San Francisco: Willey Darwis, Ranidar (2012), Mata Kuliah Hukum Adat, edisi 1, Jakarta, Universitas Terbuka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dick, W., Carey, L., and Carey, J. (2009). The Systematic Design of Instruction. New Jersey, Pearson Ellington dan Race. (1997). Handbook of Educational Technology. London: Kogan Page Limited, Ernik Yuliana. (2012), Penilaian Tingkat Keterbacaan Materi Modul Melalui Evaluasi Formatif Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh, Volume 13, Nomor 2, September 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fitzpatrick, Jody L, et.al. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Pearson, Gagne, Robert M.,Wager, W, Goles, Khatarine C.,Keller Jhon,M.,(2005). Principles of Instructional Design (5th ed.) Belmont, CA, Wadswont/Thomson Learning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ida Malati Sadjati. (2014), Peningkatan Kualitas Buku Materi Pokok Berdasarkan Hasil Uji Coba Lapangan. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh, Volume 15, Nomor 2, September 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Idha Farida. (2013), Analisis Kualitas dan Tingkat Keterbacaan Materi Bahan Ajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh, Volume 14, Nomor 2, September 2013, 69-78 Julaeha dan Pramono. (2004), Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta PAU-PPAI, Keegan, D. (1986). The foundations of distance education. Kent, UK.: Croom Helm, Linn, Robert L and Miller, M David (2005). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, New Jersey: Pearson Education Masyitoh, (2019), Hukum Adat, edisi 2, Jakarta, Universitas Terbuka [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mayer, Richard E.,(2001) Multimedia Learning Cambridge, UK1, Cambridge University Press Moore, Michael Grahame. (1997). Handbook of Distance Education: Second Edition. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Robert L., and Miller, M David (2005) Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, (9th Edition), New Jersey: Pearson Education Smaldino, Sharon E.,Rusell,JamesD.,Helnich, Robert.,and Molenda, Michael.(2005) Instructional Technology and Media for Learning (8th Edition). New Jersey, Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S, and Zvacek, S. (2015). Teaching and Learning At A Distance: Foundations of Distance Education, sixth edition, North Carolina, Information Age Publishing, Inc Suparman, M. Atwi (2004). Desain lnsrruksional. Jakarta. PAU-PPAI Universitas Terbuka, 1991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. -----------------------, (2009), Pendidikan Jarak Jauh Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan Universitas Terbuka, ________________, (2014). Desain Instruksional Modern. Edisi ke-4. Jakarta: Erlangga, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. -----------------------, (2016), Teknologi Pendidikan dalam Pendidikan Jarak Jauh Solusi untuk kualitas dan Aksesibilitas Pendidikan, Jakarta, Universitas Terbuka [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. ------------------------, (2018), Materi Pelatihan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Generasi Baru UT, Jakarta, UT. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Universitas Terbuka (2017).Katalog UT, Jakarta, UT [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wiersma, William and Jurs, Stephen G,(1990) Educational Measurement and Testing (2nd edition) Nedham Heights, Massachuset Allyn and Bacon [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study