Modelling Bim–Circular Economy Integration for Construction Waste Minimisation in Malaysia: A Pls-Sem Approach

Authors

Mohamad Amir Rahimi Zulkifli

Civil Engineering Studies, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Pematang Pauh Campus, 13500 Pulau, Pinang, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Muriatul Khusmah Musa

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Pematang Pauh Campus, 13500 Pulau, Pinang, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Mohamad Zain Hashim

Civil Engineering Studies, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Pematang Pauh Campus, 13500 Pulau, Pinang, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600525

Subject Category: Management.

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 7526-7541

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-10

Accepted: 2026-06-15

Published: 2026-06-29

Abstract

Construction waste remains a persistent sustainability challenge in the construction industry, particularly as conventional project delivery often follows a linear model of material use, disposal, and limited recovery. This study examines how Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Circular Economy practices can be integrated to support construction waste minimisation in Malaysia. Specifically, the study investigates the relationships among BIM Use, Implementation Challenges, BIM–Circular Economy Integration, and Construction Waste Minimisation. A quantitative survey was conducted among 279 Malaysian construction industry practitioners, and the data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The findings show that BIM–Circular Economy Integration has a significant positive effect on Construction Waste Minimisation, while BIM Use also directly contributes to waste reduction. However, BIM Use does not significantly influence BIM–Circular Economy Integration, suggesting that BIM adoption alone is insufficient unless it is intentionally aligned with circular economy objectives. Implementation Challenges strongly influence BIM–Circular Economy Integration but do not directly affect Construction Waste Minimisation. The mediation analysis further indicates that BIM–Circular Economy Integration significantly mediates the relationship between Implementation Challenges and Construction Waste Minimisation, but not the relationship between BIM Use and Construction Waste Minimisation. These findings highlight that effective waste minimisation requires more than digital adoption; it requires clear circular strategies, stronger organisational support, improved BIM standards, stakeholder collaboration, and practical mechanisms for material reuse, recycling, and recovery. This study contributes to sustainable construction literature by providing empirical evidence on BIM-enabled circular construction and its role in reducing construction waste in Malaysia.

Keywords

Building Information Modelling; Circular Economy; Construction Waste Minimisation; Sustainable Construction; PLS-SEM

Downloads

References

1. Aftab, U., Jaleel, F., Haroon, M., Mansoor, R., & Aslam, M. (2024). Building Information Modeling (BIM) Application in Construction Waste Quantification-A Review. Engineering Proceedings, 75(8), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/xxxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Qazzaz, I., Osorio-Sandoval, C. A., Tokbolat, S., & Thermou, G. (2025). A BIM-based decision support system for circularity and sustainability assessment in the early design stages. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2007, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2025.2566094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alsofiani, M. A. (2024). Developing a Comprehensive Measurement Tool for Assessing the Rate of BIM Adoption in the Construction Industry. http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Banihashemi, S., Meskin, S., Sheikhkhoshkar, M., Mohandes, S. R., Hajirasouli, A., & LeNguyen, K. (2024). Circular economy in construction: The digital transformation perspective. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 18(December 2023), 100715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2023.100715 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ferriz-Papi, J. A., Lee, A., & Alhawamdeh, M. (2024). Examining the Challenges for Circular Economy Implementation in Construction and Demolition Waste Management: A Comprehensive Review Using Systematic Methods. Buildings, 16(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Joseph F. Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)-Third Edition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Karanafti, A., Trubina, N., Giarma, C., Tsikaloudaki, K., & Theodosiou, T. (2024). Integrating BIMs in Construction and Demolition Waste Management for Circularity Enhancement-A Review. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 489 LNCE, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57800-7_62 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lins, E. J. M., Palha, R. P., Sobral, M. do C. M., Araújo, A. G. de, & Marques, É. A. T. (2024). Application of Building Information Modelling in Construction and Demolition Waste Management: Systematic Review and Future Trends Supported by a Conceptual Framework. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 16, Issue 21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mandiˇcák, T., Spišáková, M., & Mésároš, P. (2024). Sustainable Design and Building Information Modeling of Construction Project Management towards a Circular Economy. Sustainability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mankata, L. M., Antwi-Afari, P., Frimpong, S., & Ng, S. T. (2025). Material Passports in Construction Waste Management: A Systematic Review of Contexts, Stakeholders, Requirements, and Challenges. Buildings, 15(11), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111825 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nir, I. A., Muhammad, I. M. N., Nadirah, D., Suzila, M., & Chai, C. S. (2025). Current state of circular economy practices in Malaysia’s construction industry. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 23(4), 83–96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rashidian, S., Hossain, S. K., Volz, K., Teo, M., & Rose, T. M. (2026). Digital pathways to circularity: stakeholder engagement across the construction lifecycle in the era of construction 4.0. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-09-2025-0565 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Saka, A., Taiwo, R., Saka, N., Oluleye, B., Dauda, J., & Akanbi, L. (2024). Integrated BIM and Machine Learning System for Circularity Prediction of Construction Demolition Waste. http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. She, Y., Udawatta, N., Liu, C., & Tokede, O. (2024). Circular Economy-Related Strategies to Minimise Construction and Demolition Waste Generation in Australian Construction Projects. Buildings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. UNEP. (2025). Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2024/255: Not just another brick in the wall - The solutions exist. Scaling them will build on progress and cut emissions fast. In United Nations Environment Programme. https://doi.org/10.1049/et.2022.0103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Weerakoon, T. G., Zvirgzdins, J., Lapuke, S., Wimalasena, S., & Drukis, P. (2025). Integrating Circular Economy (CE) Principles into Construction Waste Management (CWM) Through Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(17), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles