Modelling Bim–Circular Economy Integration for Construction Waste Minimisation in Malaysia: A Pls-Sem Approach
Authors
Civil Engineering Studies, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Pematang Pauh Campus, 13500 Pulau, Pinang, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Pematang Pauh Campus, 13500 Pulau, Pinang, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Civil Engineering Studies, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Pematang Pauh Campus, 13500 Pulau, Pinang, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600525
Subject Category: Management.
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 7526-7541
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-10
Accepted: 2026-06-15
Published: 2026-06-29
Abstract
Construction waste remains a persistent sustainability challenge in the construction industry, particularly as conventional project delivery often follows a linear model of material use, disposal, and limited recovery. This study examines how Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Circular Economy practices can be integrated to support construction waste minimisation in Malaysia. Specifically, the study investigates the relationships among BIM Use, Implementation Challenges, BIM–Circular Economy Integration, and Construction Waste Minimisation. A quantitative survey was conducted among 279 Malaysian construction industry practitioners, and the data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The findings show that BIM–Circular Economy Integration has a significant positive effect on Construction Waste Minimisation, while BIM Use also directly contributes to waste reduction. However, BIM Use does not significantly influence BIM–Circular Economy Integration, suggesting that BIM adoption alone is insufficient unless it is intentionally aligned with circular economy objectives. Implementation Challenges strongly influence BIM–Circular Economy Integration but do not directly affect Construction Waste Minimisation. The mediation analysis further indicates that BIM–Circular Economy Integration significantly mediates the relationship between Implementation Challenges and Construction Waste Minimisation, but not the relationship between BIM Use and Construction Waste Minimisation. These findings highlight that effective waste minimisation requires more than digital adoption; it requires clear circular strategies, stronger organisational support, improved BIM standards, stakeholder collaboration, and practical mechanisms for material reuse, recycling, and recovery. This study contributes to sustainable construction literature by providing empirical evidence on BIM-enabled circular construction and its role in reducing construction waste in Malaysia.
Keywords
Building Information Modelling; Circular Economy; Construction Waste Minimisation; Sustainable Construction; PLS-SEM
Downloads
References
1. Aftab, U., Jaleel, F., Haroon, M., Mansoor, R., & Aslam, M. (2024). Building Information Modeling (BIM) Application in Construction Waste Quantification-A Review. Engineering Proceedings, 75(8), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/xxxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Al-Qazzaz, I., Osorio-Sandoval, C. A., Tokbolat, S., & Thermou, G. (2025). A BIM-based decision support system for circularity and sustainability assessment in the early design stages. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2007, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2025.2566094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alsofiani, M. A. (2024). Developing a Comprehensive Measurement Tool for Assessing the Rate of BIM Adoption in the Construction Industry. http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Banihashemi, S., Meskin, S., Sheikhkhoshkar, M., Mohandes, S. R., Hajirasouli, A., & LeNguyen, K. (2024). Circular economy in construction: The digital transformation perspective. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 18(December 2023), 100715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2023.100715 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ferriz-Papi, J. A., Lee, A., & Alhawamdeh, M. (2024). Examining the Challenges for Circular Economy Implementation in Construction and Demolition Waste Management: A Comprehensive Review Using Systematic Methods. Buildings, 16(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Joseph F. Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)-Third Edition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Karanafti, A., Trubina, N., Giarma, C., Tsikaloudaki, K., & Theodosiou, T. (2024). Integrating BIMs in Construction and Demolition Waste Management for Circularity Enhancement-A Review. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 489 LNCE, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57800-7_62 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Lins, E. J. M., Palha, R. P., Sobral, M. do C. M., Araújo, A. G. de, & Marques, É. A. T. (2024). Application of Building Information Modelling in Construction and Demolition Waste Management: Systematic Review and Future Trends Supported by a Conceptual Framework. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 16, Issue 21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Mandiˇcák, T., Spišáková, M., & Mésároš, P. (2024). Sustainable Design and Building Information Modeling of Construction Project Management towards a Circular Economy. Sustainability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Mankata, L. M., Antwi-Afari, P., Frimpong, S., & Ng, S. T. (2025). Material Passports in Construction Waste Management: A Systematic Review of Contexts, Stakeholders, Requirements, and Challenges. Buildings, 15(11), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111825 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Nir, I. A., Muhammad, I. M. N., Nadirah, D., Suzila, M., & Chai, C. S. (2025). Current state of circular economy practices in Malaysia’s construction industry. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 23(4), 83–96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Rashidian, S., Hossain, S. K., Volz, K., Teo, M., & Rose, T. M. (2026). Digital pathways to circularity: stakeholder engagement across the construction lifecycle in the era of construction 4.0. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-09-2025-0565 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Saka, A., Taiwo, R., Saka, N., Oluleye, B., Dauda, J., & Akanbi, L. (2024). Integrated BIM and Machine Learning System for Circularity Prediction of Construction Demolition Waste. http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. She, Y., Udawatta, N., Liu, C., & Tokede, O. (2024). Circular Economy-Related Strategies to Minimise Construction and Demolition Waste Generation in Australian Construction Projects. Buildings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. UNEP. (2025). Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2024/255: Not just another brick in the wall - The solutions exist. Scaling them will build on progress and cut emissions fast. In United Nations Environment Programme. https://doi.org/10.1049/et.2022.0103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Weerakoon, T. G., Zvirgzdins, J., Lapuke, S., Wimalasena, S., & Drukis, P. (2025). Integrating Circular Economy (CE) Principles into Construction Waste Management (CWM) Through Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(17), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Responsible Leadership, Digital Transformation Capability, and Sustainability Performance in Business and Higher Education Institutions
- Navigating the Adverse Strategies in Managing Hostile, Resistant and Disruptive Community Project Stakeholders in Nairobi County, Kenya.
- Why Management Control Systems Fail or Succeed: A Legitimacy-Based Process Explanation of Financial Performance
- An Empirical Study of Impact of Digital Marketing Frauds on Customers’ Online Buying Behaviour in Madhya Pradesh
- The Challenge of Integrating Innovative Thinking into Traditional Organizational Cultures: Examining Workplace Behavioral Culture, Accountability, and Operational Effectiveness