Moral Authority and Leadership in Pluralistic Mindanao: A Hermeneutic Study of Congressman Rufus B. Rodriguez and Archbishop Jose A. Cabantan
Authors
Liceo de Cagayan University, Cagayan de Oro City (Philippines)
Liceo de Cagayan University, Cagayan de Oro City (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0115
Subject Category: Leadership
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 1336-1345
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-15
Accepted: 2026-02-20
Published: 2026-03-07
Abstract
Leadership in culturally diverse and historically complex societies requires moral credibility beyond formal authority. This study examined how Congressman Rufus B. Rodriguez and Archbishop Jose A. Cabantan constructed and enacted moral authority within Mindanao’s multicultural and interfaith setting. Using a qualitative hermeneutic design and reflexive thematic analysis of elite interviews with political, religious, academic, and civic stakeholders, the study identified four interrelated dimensions of leadership: moral presence, responsibility and accountability, intercultural engagement, and the negotiation between idealism and pragmatic governance. Findings show that legitimacy emerged primarily from relational credibility, ethical consistency, and dialogical engagement across difference. Moral authority was sustained when leaders demonstrated integrity, transparency, and commitment to communal well-being. The study contributes to Philippine leadership scholarship by offering a contextually grounded account of how moral legitimacy operates in plural environments where political and ecclesial spheres intersect, with implications for leadership formation and governance practice.
Keywords
moral authority; plural leadership; governance
Downloads
References
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Brillantes, A. B., & Fernandez, M. T. (2011). Restoring trust and building integrity in government: Issues and concerns in the Philippines and areas for reform. International Public Management Review, 12(2), 55–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bolden, R., & Kirk, P. (2009). African leadership: Surfacing new understandings through leadership development. Leadership, 5(1), 69–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering (4th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Fairhurst, G. T., & Connaughton, S. L. (2014). Leadership: A communicative perspective. Leadership, 10(1), 7–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1960) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Greenleaf, R. K. (2008). The servant as leader. Robert K. Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership. (Original work published 1970) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. USIP Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Montiel, C. J., & Noor, N. M. (2009). Peace psychology in Asia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15(4), 307–318. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Nkomo, S. M. (2011). A postcolonial and anti-colonial reading of African leadership. Organization, 18(3), 365–386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2011). Contemporary conflict resolution (3rd ed.). Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Sinha, J. B. P. (1995). The cultural context of leadership and power. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Understanding Academic Leadership: Theory, Practice and Future Horizons
- A Literature Review on Leadership and Cultural Evolution of Adventism in East Africa Region
- Unlocking Employee Creativity Through Empowering Leadership: The Dynamic Interplay of Trust and Engagement
- The Integration of Preachers’ Leadership Competencies in Empowering Preachers for the Orang Asli Community in Malaysia
- Traditional Authority vs. Legacy Leadership: A Comparative Literature Review from the Arab World