Morphophonological Interaction in Igikuria Borrowed Nouns and Verbs from English

This study examined the morphophonological structure of Igikuria borrowed nouns and verbs from English. The focus was on the derivational and inflectional processes observed in these nouns and verbs. Morphophonological processes play a crucial role in forming and modifying nouns and verbs in a language. Several studies only focus on either phonological or morphological aspects of lexical words in language. However, little research exists concerning morphophonological processes, particularly in the context of the Igikuria borrowed nouns and verbs from English. Therefore, this study analyzed the interaction between morphological structure and phonological rules in the Igikuria borrowed nouns and verbs. The analytical tool used was Lexical Phonology and Morphology (LPM) Theory by Kiparsky (1985). Data was collected and analyzed using qualitative descriptive research design. Unstructured interviews and focus group discussion techniques assisted the collection of data using an interview schedule and discussion guide with tape recorder as research instruments. The study was conducted at Kehancha Chini in Kuria West Sub County, Migori County by targeting native Igikuira speakers. A purposive sampling procedure was used to settle down on 24 informants who provided 24 borrowed nouns and verbs. From the data set, five borrowed nouns and five borrowed verbs were analyzed and used for discussion. The findings of this study were intended to contribute to the understanding of the intricate morphophonological structure of Igikuria borrowed nouns and verbs. The study therefore offers valuable insights into the broader fields of morphophonology in Bantu linguistics, while also providing practical implications for language preservation and documentation efforts in Igikuria-speaking communities.

Morphophonology, borrowing, nouns, verbs, derivation

1. Berchtold, A. (2016). Test–retest: agreement or reliability? Methodological Innovations, 9, 2059799116672875. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cardano, M. (2020). Defending qualitative research: Design, analysis, and textualization. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Charwi, M. (2017). Morphosyntactic and semantic aspects of verb extension systems in Bantu languages: A case study of Kuria (E43) in Tanzania. Universitaet Bayreuth (Germany). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Guthrie, M. (1967). Comparative Bantu Farnborough: Gregg International Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Josiah, U., & Udoudom, J. (2012). Morphophonemic analysis of inflectional morphemes in English and Ibibio nouns: Implications for linguistic studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 72-81.Kiparsky P (1985). Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2, 85–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Letsoalo, N. (2023). Morphophonological realization on inflected verbal roots with initial vowel sounds in Sepedi. South African Journal of African Languages, 43(2), 122-130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Maroa, R. (2012). Morphophonemic processes of Igikuria (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi, Kenya). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mose, E. G. (2020). A Morphophonological analysis of Bborrowed segments in Ekegusii language: An Optimality Perspective (Doctoral dissertation, Kenyatta University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Milroy, L., & Gordon, M. (2008). Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mukanda, S. (2022). A morphophonological analysis of Luwanga nouns and verbs. (M.A research project, the University of Nairobi, Kenya) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nurse, D., & Philippson, G. (1980). The Bantu languages of East Africa: A Lexicostatistical Survey. In Edgar Polome and C. P. Hills (eds.). Language in Tanzania. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Okoroji, C. & Uchechukwu, C. (2023). Aspects of morphophonology in Igbo language. Nigerian Journal of African Studies (NJAS), 5(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Riro, R. (2020). Linguistic borrowing in a language contact situation: The case of Igikuria and English in Migori County, Kenya. (MA Thesis. Kenyatta University, Kenya). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Selinger, H. W. & Shohamy, E. (2013). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sireci, S. G. (1998). The construct of content validity. Social indicators research, 45, 83-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tarigan, K. & Sembiring, M. (2023). The allomorphy in English words: Morphology and phonology interrelated approach. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 7(1), 229-240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Umar, A. U. (2020). Infixes and infixation processes in Hausa Morphology. In Adeniyi, H., Ibileye, G. & Abdulmalik, N. (eds.) Proceedings of 31st Conference of the Linguistic Association of Nigeria (CLAN). Issues in Minority Languages and Language Development Studies in Nigeria. A Festschrift in honour of Andrew Haruna [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Culture: The (In) Human Engagement with Nature
• Identity Crisis in Orhan Pamuk’s The Black Book: A Critical Interpretation
• Metaphor in Pop-Up Swahili Sayings: Is it a New Meaning or a New Idea?
• Racial Identity and Ecological Belonging in Toni Morrison’s Beloved: A Study through Social Identity Theory and Eco-Race Theory
• The Role of Non-Human Agency in Contemporary Literature: A Posthumanist Analysis