Narrative Review: Integrating Drawing Modules to Empower Non-Option Teachers in Visual Art Education

This narrative review aims to explore the integration of drawing modules in visual art education as a strategy to empower non-option teachers those without formal training in art by enhancing their confidence, competence, and instructional effectiveness in delivering drawing lessons. Visual art education plays a crucial role in fostering creativity and visual literacy. However, many schools rely on non-option teachers to teach drawing despite their lack of adequate pedagogical training. This practice leads to variations in teaching quality and inconsistencies in student learning outcomes. Drawing modules, defined as structured teaching aids aligned with curricular objectives, have been introduced to support non-option teachers. Although several promising interventions have been implemented, there remains a lack of research on how these modules are delivered, their effectiveness, and the pedagogical challenges they aim to address. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, Google Scholar, and JSTOR databases. This review focused on fully peer-reviewed articles, program evaluations, and expert literature published between 2005 and 2025. Nineteen literature searches were conducted using predefined keywords targeting studies related to drawing instruction, teacher development, and module-based art pedagogy for non-option teachers. The studies were screened based on relevance. Drawing modules have been shown to enhance instructional clarity, student engagement, and teacher confidence. Nevertheless, several issues persist, including the lack of standardized module design, limited empirical validation, insufficient cultural inclusivity, and constraints on teacher agency. This review also highlights gaps in long-term evaluation and underscores the need for participatory approaches to module development

Drawing modules; non-option teachers, visual art education, teacher empowerment, generalist educators, art pedagogy

1. Abdullah, N., & Mahsan, I. P. (2025). Feasibility of teaching and learning exploratory arts among non-optional teachers. KUPAS SENI: Jurnal Seni dan Pendidikan Seni, 13(1), 53-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adorni, G., & Grosso, D. (2025). Continuous education for teacher empowerment. EDULEARN25 Proceedings, 6227–6235. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2025.1530 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alisoy, H. (2025). Integrating music into curriculum design: Strategies for enhancing student achievement and cognitive skills. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(4), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.0250040002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alwani, H., & Bhukya, R. (2025). Brand social sustainability and consumer behavior: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(4), e70095. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B.-B., & Essel, D. D. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practices. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bason, F., Balkcom, C., West, D., Contesse, V. A., Burns, M. K., Dean, Z., & Kern, L. E. (2025). Reviewing literature on tier implementation fidelity in foundational reading skills: Trends, measurement methods, and facilitators vs. Barriers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2025.2527416 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Elena, L., Alan, C., Nicolas, B., Ilona, B., Catherine, A., Philippe, G., & Nicolas, B. (2025). Evermore wellbeing for teens: A scoping review of stand-alone and brief positive psychology interventions for potential use in educational settings. Educational Psychology Review, 37(3), 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10033-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Giannakakos, V. P., Karanfilian, T. S., Dimopoulos, A. D., & Barmettler, A. (2025). Impact of author characteristics on outcomes of single- versus double-blind peer review: A systematic review of comparative studies in scientific abstracts and publications. Scientometrics, 130(1), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05213-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gil, M. (2025). Barriers and facilitators of emancipatory accounting education: Comparative insights from two contexts. Accounting Education, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2025.2518999 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Karataş, F., Eriçok, B., & Tanrikulu, L. (2025). Reshaping curriculum adaptation in the age of artificial intelligence: Mapping teachers’ AI ‐driven curriculum adaptation patterns. British Educational Research Journal, 51(1), 154–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kim, A. (2025). Impact of systematic support in teacher education and professional development on training-teaching alignment and instructional quality. Journal for STEM Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-025-00154-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lazim, N. A. M. (2025). Future directions and emerging trends in emi for steam education in malaysia. In Transformative Approaches to STEAM Integration in Modern Education (pp. 475–498). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7408-5.ch020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Li, J., & Qi, Y. (2025). Arts education and its role in enhancing cognitive development: A quantitative study of critical thinking and creativity in higher education. Cognitive Development, 74, 101544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2025.101544 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Malesu, M. L., & Syrovátka, P. (2025). Critical success factors for small and medium sized businesses: A PRISMA-based systematic review. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00458-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nantwi, W. K., & Asamoah, J. N. (2025). Assessing the availability and impact of physical support in implementing inclusive creative arts education in offinso municipality. Creative Education, 16(6), 854–872. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2025.166053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ozuem, W., Willis, M., Ranfagni, S., & Omeish, F. (2025). Thematic analysis in an artificial intelligence-driven context: A stage-by-stage process. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 16094069251362982. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251362982 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ramli, S. S., Maaruf, S. Z., & Abdullah, N. (2025). STEAM-ing criteria: Best criteria for integrating science module with visual art / Siti Soraya Ramli, Siti Zuraida Maaruf and Nabilah Abdullah. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 21(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v21i1.5481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rana, V., Verhoeven, K. B. T., & Sharma, M. (2025). Generative ai in design thinking pedagogy: Enhancing creativity, critical thinking, and ethical reasoning in higher education. https://openresearch.newcastle.edu.au/articles/journal_contribution/Generative_AI_in_Design_Thinking_Pedagogy_Enhancing_Creativity_Critical_Thinking_and_Ethical_Reasoning_in_Higher_Education/29614376/1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rumiyati, R., Lestari, A. P., & Juanda, J. (2025). The effectiveness of learning media in improving student learning outcomes: A systematic literature review. Journal Didaskalia, 8(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.33856/didaskalia.v8i1.519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Shin, M.-H. (2025). Designing english learning content for flipped classrooms: Strategic approaches through case-based digital modules. The Journal of Economics, Marketing and Management, 13(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.20482/jemm.2025.13.3.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tessenow, E., & Best, A. (2025). Bridging the gap: designing a teacher training concept for computer science education at the primary-secondary transition. In EDULEARN25 Proceedings (pp. 1567-1575). IATED. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zhang, Y., Dewitt, D., & Cheah, K. S. L. (2025). Virtual reality for sustainable and responsible pedagogy in art and design education: A systematic review of motivation and digital leadership. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 100311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Pragmatics Misfire: An Analysis of Misconstrued Implicature
• In the Threshold of Darkness: Visualizing Power, Identity, and Ambiguity in Datuk H (2026)
• Managing Workload among Public Elementary Schools Through Ancillary Equilibrium and Academic Excellence