Navigating Climate-Related Risks and Sustainable Finance: A Critical Review of ESG Transformation in Malaysian Plam Oil Industry
Authors
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Alor Gajah, Melaka (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Alor Gajah, Melaka (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Alor Gajah, Melaka (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Alor Gajah, Melaka (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Alor Gajah, Melaka (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700056
Subject Category: Financial Management
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 747-758
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-06
Accepted: 2026-07-11
Published: 2026-07-23
Abstract
The climate change has become a critical global challenge for environmental sustainability, economic development, and corporate performance in industries. The plantation sector, particularly the palm oil industry, is highly exposed to climate-related risks because it depends on environmental stability and favourable weather conditions. This case study is about SD Guthrie Berhad, a leading global producer of palm oil, and how they manage climate-related risks through sustainable finance and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) practices. The study discusses major concerns related to environment and climate change due to plantation activities, including deforestation, biodiversity loss, greenhouse gas emissions, water pollution and climate change-induced operational disruptions. It also looks at SD Guthrie Berhad’s challenges on sustainability transformation, regulatory compliance, climate governance and operational resilience. The study also evaluates the company’s sustainability efforts, including its commitment to net-zero emissions, methane capture activities, renewable energy projects, biodiversity preservation programs, NDPE (No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation) guidelines, and ESG reporting standards. The analysis is guided by the Stakeholder Theory, Legitimacy Theory and Risk Management Theory. Research findings indicate that climate-related risks are increasingly impacting the operational continuity, financial sustainability, investor confidence and environmental accountability of the plantation sector. Therefore, effective ESG governance and sustainable finance practices are critical to increasing organisational resilience and long-term competitiveness. Based on the findings, this study proposes an ESG Transformation Roadmap (ETR) as a conceptual framework for integrating climate risk management, ESG governance, sustainable finance and stakeholder engagement to support climate-resilient decision-making. The study concludes that continuous sustainability transformation, climate adaptation strategies and closer collaboration among companies, regulators, investors and stakeholders are crucial in supporting sustainable development in Malaysia’s plantation industry.
Keywords
Climate-Related Risk, Sustainable Finance, ESG Transformation, Environmental Sustainability, Plantation Sector
Downloads
References
1. Bolton, P., Després, M., Pereira da Silva, L. A., Samama, F., & Svartzman, R. (2020). The green swan: Central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change. Bank for International Settlements. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Capelle-Blancard, G., & Petit, A. (2019). Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Carlson, K. M., Heilmayr, R., Gibbs, H. K., Noojipady, P., Burns, D. N., Morton, D. C., Walker, N. F., Paoli, G. D., & Kremen, C. (2018). Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704728114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Colchester, M., Chao, S., Dallinger, J., Sokhannaro, H. E. P., Dan, V. T., & Villanueva, J. (2011). Oil palm expansion in South East Asia: Trends and implications for local communities and indigenous peoples. Forest Peoples Programme & Sawit Watch. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cramb, R. A., & Curry, G. N. (2012). Oil palm and rural livelihoods in the Asia-Pacific region: An overview. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 53(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2012.01484.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Dovbiy, I., Kobylyakova, V. V., & Minkin, A. (2022). ESG transition as a new paradigm of global economy and sustainable financing. Bulletin of the South Ural State University Series Economics and Management, 16(1), 72–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Zyglidopoulos, S., & Parmar, B. (2020). Stakeholder theory: Concepts and strategies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108539506 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2021). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(4), 210–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023). IFRS sustainability disclosure standards. IFRS Foundation. https://www.ifrs.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kashyap, S., Rastogi, S., & Agarwal, B. (2025). The ESG imperative: Transforming risk management in the age of sustainable finance in the Indian banking industry. NMIMS Management Review, 33, 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/09711023251356167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Lambin, E. F., Gibbs, H. K., Heilmayr, R., Carlson, K. M., Fleck, L. C., Garrett, R. D., le Polain de Waroux, Y., McDermott, C. L., McLaughlin, D., Newton, P., Nolte, C., Pacheco, P., Rausch, L. L., Streck, C., Thorlakson, T., & Walker, N. F. (2018). The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation. Nature Climate Change, 8(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0061-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Meijaard, E., Garcia-Ulloa, J., Sheil, D., Wich, S. A., Carlson, K. M., Juffe-Bignoli, D., & Brooks, T. M. (2020). Oil palm and biodiversity: A situation analysis by the IUCN Oil Palm Task Force. International Union for Conservation of Nature. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.11.en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Network for Greening the Financial System. (2023). NGFS climate scenarios for central banks and supervisors. NGFS. https://www.ngfs.net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Paterson, R. R. M., Kumar, L., Taylor, S., & Lima, N. (2015). Future climate effects on suitability for growth of oil palms in Malaysia and Indonesia. Scientific Reports, 5, 14457. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14457 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. SD Guthrie Berhad. (2024). Sustainability report 2024. SD Guthrie Berhad. https://www.sdguthrie.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Shirai, S. (2023). Promoting sustainable finance and financial stability through climate-related corporate disclosure in Asia. Asian Development Bank Institute Working Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2023). Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Financial Stability Board. https://www.fsb-tcfd.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Vijay, V., Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., & Smith, S. J. (2016). The impacts of oil palm on recent deforestation and biodiversity loss. PLoS ONE, 11(7), e0159668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159668 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Woittiez, L. S., van Wijk, M. T., Slingerland, M., van Noordwijk, M., & Giller, K. E. (2017). Yield gaps in oil palm: A quantitative review of contributing factors. European Journal of Agronomy, 83, 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.11.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. World Bank. (2023). Climate and development report: Malaysia. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. World Economic Forum. (2024). Global risks report 2024. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Yang, X., & Shi, Y. (2024). Optimising corporate financial performance through ESG integration faced by climate change. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 182, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.18252 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Yunus, Y. A., & Nanda, S. (2024). Exploring sustainable finance: A qualitative inquiry into responsible investment and ESG risk evaluation. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.52970/grfm.v4i1.429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Zhang, R. (2025). Green finance and ESG investment strategies under climate risk management. Economics and Management Innovation. https://doi.org/10.71222/00d71j98 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Influence of Malaysia Firm Size on Financial Performance in ICT Sector
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Financial Decision-Making and Investment Behaviour among Individual Investors in India: The Roles of Perceived Accuracy, Trust, Risk and Financial Literacy
- Investor Behaviour as a Driver of Financial Market Bubbles: A Review of the Behavioural Finance Literature