Navigating Digital Challenges: The Role of Digital Parenting in Child Protection and Mental Well-being

Authors

Kumuta Arumugam

Faculty of Education and Humanities, Unitar International University, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Anand Raj Supramaniam

Faculty of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Nilai University, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Mahendran Ramasamy

Faculty of Education and Humanities, Unitar International University, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Safraz Aslam

Faculty of Education and Humanities, Unitar International University, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102400030

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/24 | Page No: 452-465

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-18

Accepted: 2026-08-23

Published: 2026-09-25

Abstract

Digital technologies are evolving in many aspects of children’s life such as in learning methodologies, communication, and social skills which simultaneously increasing their exposure to cyber-social risks such as cyberbullying, online grooming, digital exploitation, privacy breaches, and harmful online content. This conceptual paper examines the role of digital parenting in enhancing child protection and promoting children's mental well-being in the digital era. Through a synthesis of existing literature, the paper integrates three interconnected domains: digital parenting, child protection, and mental well-being. Digital parenting is conceptualized as a multidimensional construct encompassing parental mediation, monitoring, communication, emotional support, guidance, digital literacy, supervision, and collaborative engagement in children's digital activities. Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) is employed to explain how parents' awareness and perceptions of online risks motivate protective behaviors that enhance children's online safety. In addition, Seligman's PERMA framework is adopted to explain how protected and positive digital experiences contribute to children's mental well-being through positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment. The paper proposes a conceptual framework in which effective digital parenting strengthens child protection mechanisms, reducing children's vulnerability to cyber-related harms while fostering resilience, emotional stability, social connectedness, and overall psychological well-being. The framework contributes to the literature by integrating digital parenting, child protection, and mental well-being into a unified model and highlights digital parenting as both a protective and developmental process. The study also supports the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), SDG 4 (Quality Education), and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions), by promoting children's safety, digital resilience, and positive development in digital environments.

Keywords

Digital parenting; child protection; mental well-being; cyber-social risks; Protection Motivation Theory (PMT); PERMA framework; SDGs.

Downloads

References

1. Arumugam, K. (2026). Pengaruh gaya keibubapaan terhadap pencapaian akademik anak: Satu kertas konseptual (The influence of parenting styles on children's academic achievement: A conceptual paper). Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 8(4), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.55057/ajress.2026.8.4.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barnes, R., & Potter, A. (2021). Sharenting and parents’ digital literacy: An agenda for future research. Communication Research and Practice, 7(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2020.1847819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baumrind, D. (1968). Authoritarian versus authoritative parental control. Adolescence, 3, 255–272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Benedetto, L., & Ingrassia, M. (2021). Digital parenting: Raising and protecting children in the media world. In Parenting—Studies by an ecocultural and transactional perspective. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92579 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Broderick, C. B. (1993). Understanding family process: Basics of family systems theory. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chevtaeva, E., Neuhofer, B., Egger, R., & Rainoldi, M. (2024). Travel while working remotely: A topological data analysis of well-being in remote work trip experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 63(2), 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231151923 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Collier, B. (2021). Protecting children online: Balancing privacy, freedom, and safety. Information & Communications Technology Law, 30(3), 315–331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Coulter, N., García-Gómez, D. C., Healy, S., Jeong, H.-S., Mauk, M., Sheppard, L. C., Willett, R., & Zhao, X. A. (2026). Family media practices in a post-pandemic future: Conversations from a transglobal research project. Children & Society, 40(2), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12931 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Erstad, O., Hegna, K., Livingstone, S., Negru-Subtirica, O., & Stoilova, M. (2024). How digital technologies become embedded in family life across generations: Scoping the agenda for researching 'platformised relationality'. Families, Relationships and Societies, 13(2), 164-180. https://doi.org/10.1332/20467435Y2024D000000023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Escortell, R., Delgado, B., Baquero, A., & Martínez-Monteagudo, M. C. (2023). Special issue: Child protection in the digital age. Latent profiles in cyberbullying and the relationship with self-concept and achievement goals in preadolescence. Child & Family Social Work, 28(4), 1046–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Giumetti, G. W., & Kowalski, R. M. (2022). Cyberbullying via social media and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gupta, V. K. (2025). The digital childhood dilemma: Reconciling children’s rights, online safety, and legal safeguards against exploitation in an era of cyber vulnerabilities. Journal of Teachers and Teacher Education, 2(1), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. https://doi.org/10.33545/30810647.2025.v2.i1.A.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. International Telecommunication Union. (2020). Guidelines on online child protection. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Cybersecurity/Pages/COP/COP.aspx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020). Digital Educational Learning Initiative Malaysia (DELIMa). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kemp, S. (2024). Digital 2024: Global overview report. DataReportal. https://wearesocial.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Digital_2024_Global.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kim, A. S., & Yap, C. S. F. (2025). Psychological mechanisms behind the influence of immersive technologies on consumer well-being. Psychology & Marketing, 42(11), 2747–2766. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kirwil, L. (2009). Parental mediation of children’s internet use in different European countries. Journal of Children and Media, 3(4), 394–409. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482790903233440 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lee, S. E., & Yoo, J.-J. (2025). Extending the PERMA framework to immersive technologies: A qualitative exploration of well-being in digital environments. International Journal of Costume and Fashion, 25(2), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.7233/ijcf.2025.25.2.059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Levido, A., Matthews, S., Amery, P., & Cross, E. (2026). Parent perspectives of digital media for learning at home. Children & Society, 40(2), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12979 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mahlan, S. B., & Hamat, M. (2020). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam talian semasa Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan. SIG: e-Learning@CS, 1, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Modecki, K. L., Goldberg, R. E., Wisniewski, P., & Orben, A. (2022). What is digital parenting? A systematic review of past measurement and blueprint for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(6), 1673–1691. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211072458 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nannat, A., Tariang, N. M., & Kuruvila, A. (2025). Parenting in the digital age: Adolescent perspectives on internet parenting styles and problematic internet use. Annals of Indian Psychiatry, 9(4), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.4103/aip.aip_44_25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. National Cyber Security Agency. (2025). Malaysia Cyber Security Strategy 2025–2030. Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nicolaidou, I., & Venizelou, A. (2020). Improving children’s e-safety skills through an interactive learning environment: A quasi-experimental study. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(2), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4020010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3423–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Novianti, R., Mahdum, Suarman, Elmustian, Firdaus, Hadriana, Sumarno, Rusandi, M. A., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2023). Internet-based parenting intervention: A systematic review. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14671 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). How’s life for children in the digital age? https://doi.org/10.1787/0854b900-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rantanen, T., Gluschkoff, K., Silvennoinen, P., & Heponiemi, T. (2021). The associations between mental health problems and attitudes toward web-based health and social care services: Evidence from a Finnish population-based study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(9). https://doi.org/10.2196/28066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Rahman, N. A. (2022). Community resilience in urban settings. In L. Tan & M. Kumar (Eds.), Contemporary social development studies (pp. 88–105). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Selvanathan, B. V. (2025). Effective ways to engage learners actively in an online classroom setting in Malaysian higher education institutions. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 7(4), 77-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Smith, J. A., & Lee, T. R. (2023). Digital wellbeing among university students. Journal of Educational Research, 15(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Song, Q., Huang, M., Ren, Z., Lin, X., Li, S., Sun, B., & Li, Y. (2025). User well-being in kitchen environment design from a positive psychology perspective: A quantitative and qualitative literature analysis. Buildings, 15(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Stanford Center for Digital Health. (2025). Youth safety and digital wellbeing report 2025. Stanford University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Sukumaran, R. D., Mohd Nasir, F. D., Abdul Rahman, N. I., Che Ani, S., & Mohd Zuki, N. H. (2021). Students’ motivation towards English language learning during the pandemic COVID-19 in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8063215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Supramaniam, A. R. (2024). A study on the academic quality compliances for online-based examinations at higher education institutions in Kuala Lumpur. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 6(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2017). A qualitative study into parental mediation of adolescents’ internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Syukur, Y., Putra, A. H., Ardi, Z., Zahri, T. N., & Putri, J. E. (2024). Global perspectives on digital parenting: Challenges and opportunities in improving family well-being. E3S Web of Conferences, 568. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456804014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Tan, C. Y., Pan, Q., Tao, S., Liang, Q., Lan, M., Feng, S., Cheung, H. S., & Liu, D. (2024). Conceptualization, measurement, predictors, outcomes, and interventions in digital parenting research: A comprehensive umbrella review. Educational Research Review, 45, Article 100647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. UNICEF. (2024, September 23). Protecting and prioritizing children’s rights and safety in the digital world: A call to action. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. United Nations. (1989, November 20). Convention on the Rights of the Child. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2021). General comment No. 25 (2021) on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment (CRC/C/GC/25). United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Xie, X., Xue, Q., Zhou, Y., Zhu, K., Liu, Q., Zhang, J., & Song, R. (2020). Mental health status among children in home confinement during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in Hubei Province, China. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(9), 898–900. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1619 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Yaacob, N. M., Ishak, R., & Ghani, M. F. A. (2024). Hubungan kepimpinan multidimensi pengetua dengan penerimaan guru terhadap Digital Education Learning Initiative Malaysia (DELIMa): Satu tinjauan awal. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 11(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.22452/jupidi.vol11no1.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Zgambo, M., Anyango, E., Arabiat, D. H., Ngune, I., Mörelius, E., Zhang, M., & Whitehead, L. C. (2025). Effect of digital safety interventions on parental practices in safeguarding children’s digital activities: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 8, Article e70745. https://doi.org/10.2196/70745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Zhang, Y., Chen, C., Teng, Z., & Guo, C. (2021). Parenting style and cyber-aggression in Chinese youth: The role of moral disengagement and moral identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 621878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621878 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Zheng, J. (2025). The effects of parenting styles on children’s emotional and social skill development: The mediating role of emotion regulation skills. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 84, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.20550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles