Navigating Patriarchy: The Influence of Male Control and Fear of Subjugation on Non-Marital Childbearing in Mushin, Lagos State
Authors
Clinton Health Assess Initiative, Lagos (Nigeria)
Health Systems Consult Limited, Lagos (Nigeria)
University of Cape Town, South Africa (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500009
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 95-107
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-27
Accepted: 2026-05-02
Published: 2026-05-21
Abstract
Patriarchal structures and associated power differentials between men and women have long shaped family formation patterns in Nigeria. This study examines how male control and the fear of subjugation within marital relationships influence women's decisions to bear children outside of marriage in Mushin Local Government Area (LGA) of Lagos State. Drawing on qualitative data from 40 in-depth interviews with women who had given birth outside marriage, the study employed purposive and snowball sampling within a qualitative research framework, with data analysed using content analysis. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) provides the conceptual anchor, linking individual attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control to the decision to engage in non-marital childbearing. Findings demonstrate that the anticipation of male domination, the erosion of women's autonomy within marriage, and the perceived psychological and social costs of patriarchal control constitute significant drivers of non-marital childbearing. Many respondents expressed a preference for single motherhood over subjugation within patriarchal marriage, citing the desire for independent decision-making and freedom from coercive male authority. The study further reveals that feminist consciousness, evolving gender norms, and greater economic independence are reshaping women's attitudes toward marriage and motherhood in contemporary urban Nigeria, contributing to the conditions under which non-marital childbearing becomes a viable and sometimes preferred reproductive option. The findings call for gender-sensitive policy frameworks that address power imbalances within family structures and support women's reproductive autonomy.
Keywords
patriarchy; male control; non-marital childbearing; gender
Downloads
References
1. Adebowale, S. A., Fagbamigbe, F. A., & Bamgboye, E. A. (2012). Contraceptive use: Implication for completed fertility, parity progression, and birth intervals in Nigeria. African Population Studies, 26(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.11564/26-1-150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aina, O. I. (1998). Women, culture and society. In A. Sesay & A. Odebiyi (Eds.), Nigerian women in society and development (pp. 3–30). Dokun Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Akerlof, G. A., Yellen, J. L., & Katz, M. L. (2006). An analysis of out-of-wedlock childbearing in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), 277–317. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946680 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Amato, P. (2005). The impact of family formation change on the cognitive, social, and emotional well-being of the next generation. The Future of Children, 15(2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2005.0012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Atsenuwa, A. (2011). Constitutionalism and legal feminism: Stepping stones or impediments on the long road to freedom for Nigerian women? [Maiden Professor Jadesola Akande Memorial Lecture]. Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bawah, A. A., Akweongo, P., Simmons, R., & Phillips, J. F. (1999). Women’s fears and men’s anxieties: The impact of family planning on gender relations in northern Ghana. Studies in Family Planning, 30(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.1999.00054.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Caldwell, J. C., & Caldwell, P. (1987). The cultural context of high fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. Population and Development Review, 13(3), 409–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/1973133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Dodoo, F. N.-A., & Frost, A. E. (2008). Gender in African population research: The fertility/reproductive health example. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134552 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Durojaye, E. (2015). “Woman but not human”: Widowhood practices and human rights violations in Nigeria. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 27(2), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebt003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Gibson-Davis, C. (2009). Money, marriage, and children: Testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00586.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Hakim, C. (2003). A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: Preference theory. Population and Development Review, 29(3), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00349.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Inhorn, M. C., & Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. (2008). Assisted reproductive technologies and culture change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Isiugo-Abanihe, U. C. (2003). Male role and responsibility in fertility and reproductive health in Nigeria. African Population Studies, 18(2), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.11564/18-2-418 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Jejeebhoy, S. J. (1995). Women's education, autonomy, and reproductive behaviour: Experience from developing countries. Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Jewkes, R., & Morrell, R. (2010). Gender and sexuality: Emerging perspectives from the heterosexual epidemic in South Africa and implications for HIV risk and prevention. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 13(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-13-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Jewkes, R., Flood, M., & Lang, J. (2015). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: A conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. The Lancet, 385(9977), 1580–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61683-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Johnson-Hanks, J. (2006). Uncertain honor: Modern motherhood in an African crisis. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Krueger, F., Reilly, D., Alan, L., & Carsrud, I. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Meekers, D., & Ahmed, G. (2000). Contemporary patterns of adolescent fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 4(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/3583243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Ntoimo, L. F. C., & Mutambudzi, J. (2019). Socioeconomic and demographic determinants of non-marital fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. International Health, 11(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihy080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. National Population Commission [NPC] [Nigeria] & ICF. (2019). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. NPC and ICF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Nyarko, S. H., & Potter, L. (2021). Levels and socioeconomic correlates of nonmarital fertility in Ghana. PLOS ONE, 16(2), e0247189. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Obi, C. I., & Onwuzuruigbo, I. (2019). Social media and the transformation of the ‘baby mama’ narrative in urban Nigeria. Journal of African Media Studies, 11(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00004_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Ogunjuyigbe, P. O., Akinlo, A., & Ebigbola, J. A. (2009). Spousal communication and family planning decisions in Nigerian urban settings. African Population Studies, 23(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.11564/23-2-319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Okafor, E. E., & Aderinto, A. A. (2009). Feminism and family studies: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 40(3), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.40.3.429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Oluwatobi, A. (2019). Non-marital fertility in Nigeria: Levels, patterns, and associated factors [Conference paper]. Population Association of America Annual Meeting, Austin, Texas. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Pereira, C. (2005). Domesticating women? Gender, religion and the state in Nigeria under colonial and military rule. African Identities, 3(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725840500065937 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Ribar, D. C. (2015). Why marriage matters for child well-being. The Future of Children, 25(2), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2015.0015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Smith, D. J. (2007). A culture of corruption: Everyday deception and popular discontent in Nigeria. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Trimarchi, A., & Van Bavel, J. (2018). Pathways to marital and non-marital first birth: The role of his and her education. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 15, 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2017s143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Wildsmith, E., Steward-Streng, N. R., & Manlove, J. (2012). Childbearing outside of marriage: Estimates and trends in the United States. Child Trends Research Brief, 2011–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Williams, K., Sassler, S., Frech, A., Addo, F., & Cooksey, E. (2011). Nonmarital childbearing, union history, and women's health at midlife. American Sociological Review, 76(3), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411405415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar