Navigating Rhetoric and Rule: Analysis of In-Text APA Referencing in ESL Diploma Students' Problem-Solution Essays
Authors
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Melaka (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Melaka (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Melaka (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Melaka (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Melaka (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100446
Subject Category: Referencing
Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 5704-5714
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-13
Accepted: 2025-12-21
Published: 2025-12-16
Abstract
Accurate citation is important to maintain academic integrity and effective communication. Yet, many students of English as a Second Language (ESL), especially those with diploma qualification, face considerable obstacles in accurately using referencing rules, including those outlined by the American Psychological Association (APA). This study, employing mixed methods approach, explores the in-text citation habits of twenty ESL students at diploma level (CEFR B1-B2) enrolled in an English for professional communication course, examining their 600-word essays that deal with problem-solving scenarios. The investigation focused on citation rates, accuracy of citations, and patterns of integration. A total of 91 citations were found, of which only 63% were completely correct. Common mistakes include omitting years of publication, improper application of conjunctions in place of ampersand (&) in parenthetical references, and failure to effectively integrate sources within solution-oriented parts of the essay. Qualitative insights indicate that these discrepancies arise from a limited, procedural understanding of citation, viewed as a mechanical requirement rather than a strategic rhetorical skill. This study argues that direct, genre-specific instruction on citations is important to help students move from mere technical compliance to strategically using sources to build credible arguments.
Keywords
in-text citation, APA citation, problem solution essay, sources, writing instructions
Downloads
References
1. Ahn, C.-Y., & Oh, S.-Y. (2024). Citation practices in applied linguistics: a comparative study of korean master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 69, 101369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Allagui, B. (2023). Examining the impact of the number of sources on students’ writing performance and self-efficacy beliefs. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02175-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Amini Farsani, M., Stapleton, P., & Jamali, H. R. (2025). Charting L2 argumentative writing: a systematic review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 68, 101208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Atikhom Thienthong. (2025). Predicting verb forms in reporting and reported clauses: a corpus-based study of academic citations. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 5(3), 100155–100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2025.100155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Attapol Khamkhien. (2024). The art of referencing: Patterns of citation and authorial stance in academic texts written by thai students and professional writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 74, 101470–101470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101470 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Baxter, G., & Neumann, H. (2023). Source-based writing of the high- and low-proficiency adolescent writer in the high-school L2 classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 101064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Camp, N. T., Bengtson, J. A., & Sandstrom, J. C. (2025). The citation catastrophe: Propagation of AI-generated counterfeit citations in scholarship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(4), 103065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chan, T. H. T., & Kwan, B. S. C. (2024). Citation content in literature review sections of research articles: a cross-paradigm comparison of design science and interpretivist research in information systems. English for Specific Purposes, 73, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.08.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chung, E., & Wan, A. (2025). Examining the use of academic vocabulary in first-year ESL undergraduates’ writing: A corpus-driven study in Hong Kong. Assessing Writing, 63, 100913–100913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100913 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Davis, M. (2013). The development of source use by international postgraduate students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Docherty, P. (2019). An exploratory study in the use of direct quotation by L2 entry level Bachelor students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Doolan, S. M. (2021). An exploratory analysis of source integration in post-secondary L1 and L2 source-based writing. English for Specific Purposes, 62, 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Friedman, D. A. (2019). Citation as a social practice in a TESOL graduate program: a language socialization approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Geng, Y., Chen, G., & Li, M. (2024). Analyzing engagement strategies in argument chain: a comparison between high- and low-scoring EFL undergraduate argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71, 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kumar, N., & Madhusudhan, M. (2024). Referencing revisited: A comparative look at MLA, APA and IS:IDBR. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 71(3). https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v71i3.10353 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Lee, J. J., Hitchcock, C., & Elliott Casal, J. (2018). Citation practices of L2 university students in first-year writing: Form, function, and stance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.01.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Li, H., & Yu, X. (2024). Verb argument constructions in argumentative essays by college-level Asian learners of English: Exploring the effects of English proficiency, acquisition context, and topic. Journal of Second Language Writing, 65, 101127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Mochizuki, N. (2025). EFL undergraduate students’ thinking and awareness in genre-based writing: Conceptualizing rhetorical moves and experimenting with linguistic knowledge. Journal of Second Language Writing, 70, 101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mu, C. (2024). Citation choices in L2 novices’ and experts’ literature review sections: a functional discourse analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 68, 101361–101361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101361 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Neumann, H., Leu, S., & McDonough, K. (2019). L2 writers’ use of outside sources and the related challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Neumann, H., Leu, S., McDonough, K., & Crawford, B. (2020). Improving students’ source integration skills: Does a focus on reading comprehension and vocabulary development work? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 48, 100909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Nikbakht, E., & Miller, R. T. (2023). The development of ESL students’ synthesis writing through reading instruction. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 65, 101274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Petrić, B. (2007). Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Rong, J., Deng, Y., & Liu, D. (2025). The effects of incorporating mindset intervention in L2 English writing on Chinese college EFL students’ learning engagement and writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 68, 101193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Shi, L. (2012). Rewriting and paraphrasing source texts in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Sun, Q., Kuzborska, I., & Soden, B. (2022). Learning to construct authorial voice through citations: a longitudinal case study of L2 postgraduate novice writers. System, 106, 102765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102765 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Weigle, S. C., & Parker, K. (2012). Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Wette, R. (2010). Evaluating student learning in a university-level EAP unit on writing using sources. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(3), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.06.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Wette, R. (2017). Source text use by undergraduate post-novice L2 writers in disciplinary assignments: Progress and ongoing challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Xie, Q. (2023). Assessing source use: Summary vs. reading-to-write argumentative essay. Assessing Writing, 57, 100755–100755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Yan, J., & Ma, Q. (2024). Developing advanced citation skills: a mixed-methods approach to corpus technology training for novice researchers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 72, 101451–101451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101451 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Yang, W., Cushing, S. T., & Yu, G. (2025). Linguistic predictors of L2 writing performance: Variations across genres. Assessing Writing, 66, 100985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2025.100985 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Yu Kyoung Shin, & Won, D.-O. (2024). To what extent do L2 learners produce genre-appropriate language? A comparative analysis of lexical bundles in argumentative essays and speeches. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 69, 101389–101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101389 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Zhang, G. (2022). The citational practice of social science research articles: An analysis by part-genres. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 55, 101076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Zhu, X., Li, G. Y., Cheong, C. M., & Wen, H. (2021). Effects of L1 single-text and multiple-text comprehension on L2 integrated writing. Assessing Writing, 49, 100546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100546 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]