Navigating the Digital Divide: Barriers to Digital Innovation Adoption among Rural MSMEs in Sabah, Malaysia

Authors

Debbra Toria Nipo

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah; Centre for Economic Development and Policy, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Jaratin Lily

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Noor Fzlinda Fabeil

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Izaan Azyan Abdul Jamil

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah; Centre for Economic Development and Policy, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Mori Kogid

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah; Centre for Economic Development and Policy, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Pei Sung Toh

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah; Centre for Economic Development and Policy, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Sidah Idris

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Charlie Albert Lasuin

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500082

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 1236-1250

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-25

Accepted: 2026-04-30

Published: 2026-05-23

Abstract

Despite the growing emphasis on digital transformation in national development agendas, rural micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in Malaysia continue to lag in adopting digital innovations. This study investigates the multifaceted barriers to digital innovation adoption among rural MSMEs in Sabah, using a quantitative exploratory approach. Drawing on responses from 103 firms across various rural districts, the study evaluates six key categories of barriers: socio-cultural, technical, economic, regulatory-institutional, policy-related, and innovation environment. Descriptive analysis reveals uniformly high barrier perceptions, with innovation environment (M = 4.79) and economic constraints (M = 4.79) rated as the most significant. Comparative analysis across firm age groups highlights that startup firms experience the highest innovation-related constraints, while growth-stage firms encounter intensified economic and policy-related barriers. Contrary to earlier infrastructure-centric literature, findings suggest that behavioral inertia, institutional misalignment, and capability deficits are now the dominant inhibitors of digital adoption. Grounded in the Diffusion of Innovations and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) frameworks, the study underscores the need for policy interventions that are context-sensitive, age-specific, and ecosystem-oriented. It concludes that bridging the rural digital divide requires not only technological provisioning but also robust strategies to cultivate innovation mindsets, restructure financing mechanisms, and align multi-level policies.

Keywords

Digital Innovation Adoption, Rural MSMEs, Digital Divide

Downloads

References

1. Baharin, A. T., Ishak, N. A., Redzuan, N. A. L., Yusof, S. M., Sahadun, N. A., Hati, D. M., & Jamaluddin, S. P. S. (2025). Exploring the level of digital literacy and the adoption of precision farming technologies among smallholder paddy farmers in Kedah. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(40s), 829-843. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i40s.7524 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cheuk, S., Atang, A., Lo, M., & Ramayah, T. (2018). Barriers to digital marketing adoption at remote rural tourism destinations in Sarawak: An exploratory study. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2.29), 86. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: does firm age play a role?. Research Policy, 45(2), 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Darail, M. A. K., Zainuddin, N. M. M., Maarop, N., Bani, N. A., & Johari, S. (2023). Proposed research model for mobile digital wallet adoption among consumers in Malaysia. Open International Journal of Informatics. https://doi.org/10.11113/oiji2023.11n2.265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Donald, K. H., & Hashim, H. (2025). Exploring digital education: Experiential insights of ESL teachers in rural Malaysian schools. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.903sedu0067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fang, Y., Gill, S. S., Kunasekaran, P., Rosnon, M. R., Talib, A., & Abd Aziz, A. (2022). Digital divide: An inquiry on the native communities of Sabah. Societies, 12(6), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ferrari, A., Mazzocchi, C., & Corsi, S. (2022). Barriers to digital innovation in rural areas: Evidence from agri-food SMEs. Information and Software Technology, 146, 106816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106816 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fiestiandani, I., Setijaningrum, E., Supeno, E., & Samad, S. (2026). Between bytes, being, and the bridging of boundaries: the human dimension of policy capacity in rural Indonesia’s digital public service delivery. Cogent Social Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2624790 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gemelgo, B., Pereira, L. F., Dias, Á. L., & Crespo Carvalho, J. (2025). Unpacking disruptive innovation: Key insights and strategies for competitive advantage. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(4), 100641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ghobakhloo, M., & Tang, S. H. (2015). Information system success among manufacturing SMEs: case of developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 21(4), 573–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2014.996201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Halim, H., Andalib, T. W., Hazlina, N., & Ramayah, T. (2023). Effect of internal barriers on innovation performance in embryonic SMEs in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2023.28.2.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hollimon, L. A., Taylor, K. V., Fiegenbaum, R., Carrasco, M., Garchitorena Gomez, L., Chung, D., & Seixas, A. A. (2025). Redefining and solving the digital divide and exclusion to improve healthcare: going beyond access to include availability, adequacy, acceptability, and affordability. Frontiers in Digital Health, 7, 1508686. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1508686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Indrawati, H., Caska, & Suarman. (2020). Barriers to technological innovations of SMEs: How to solve them? International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(5), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2020-0049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jamsari, H., Jasmine, A. M., Norhamidah, J., Suwaiba, Z., & Nordin, M. (2012). Factors associated with the continuality of agricultural innovation adoption in Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(1), 47-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v5n1p47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ladin, M. A. B., Jaimin, F. I., Abdul Taha, N., Gungat, L., Mirasa, A. K., & Idris, S. B. I. (2020). Study on the transportation system in the East Coast of Sabah. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 9(4), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B3891.119420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Malik, S. A., Zakaria, N., & Othman, S. (2025). Digital marketing in MSMEs: A focus on challenges and opportunities in Johor. Insight Journal, 12(1), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.24191/ij.v12i1.4221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Manning, L. (2024). Innovating in an uncertain world: Understanding the social, technical and systemic barriers to farmers adopting new technologies. Challenges, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/challe15020032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mohamad, A., Angsor, M. A. M., Adi, M. N. M., & Min, A. T. J. (2025, May). Malaysia's e-commerce landscape: legal structures and operational hurdles. In International Conference on Medical Imaging, Electronic Imaging, Information Technologies, and Sensors (MIEITS 2025) (Vol. 13631, pp. 189-196). SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3059023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Naseri, R. N. N., & Idris, N. H. (2025). Addressing low digital literacy among rural farmers through the AGRIKIT. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.9010404 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nipo, D. T. A., Lily, J., Fabeil, N. F., & Jamil, I. (2024). Transforming rural entrepreneurship through digital innovation: A review on opportunities, barriers and challenges. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 14(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v14n2p114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Oladokun, B., Ajani, Y., & Tella, A. (2025). Traditional Surveys Versus Digital Surveys: Perspectives of Library and Information Science Researchers on Best Method for Data Collection in Research. Folia Toruniensia, 25, 13–37. https://doi.org/10.12775/FT.2025.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Salleh, N., William, R. M., Ramli, R., Zakaria, N. S., Saikim, F. H., Amat, A., & Mohd Merican, A. M. (2023). Digital poverty in Sabah: Socio-economic factors shaping digital accessibility during the post-COVID-19 era. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(12), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i12/19881 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Samuel, I. E. (2025). Interpreting Community Narratives on the Value of Money and Exchange in Rural Digital Economies. Neo Journal of Economy and Social Humanities, 4(3), 456–464. https://doi.org/10.56403/nejesh.v4i3.320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sen, S., Savitskie, K., Mahto, R. V., Kumar, S., & Khanin, D. (2023). Strategic flexibility in small firms. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 31(5), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2022.2036223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 45(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Surianshah, S. (2021). Digital divide in education during COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 55(3), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.17576/jem-2021-5503-07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Uvarova, T., & Vitola, A. (2019). Challenges of digital transformation in rural areas: Case of Latvia. Public Policy and Administration, 18(1), 130–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.18.1.23134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. van Dijk, J. A. J. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide: inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles