Need of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem for Serial Entrepreneurs in Pakistan
Authors
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) (Pakistan)
Professor of Economics Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) (Pakistan)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400372
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 5098-5118
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-09
Accepted: 2026-04-15
Published: 2026-05-11
Abstract
Institutional support for serial entrepreneurs remains an underexplored area within Pakistan's entrepreneurial ecosystem, and this study addresses that gap by investigating what institutional mechanisms exist for serial entrepreneurs and where critical structural deficiencies persist. This study employs a qualitative phenomenological design, collecting primary data through semi-structured interviews with seven purposively selected expert informants representing national incubation centers, government policy bodies, financial institutions, chambers of commerce, and private consultants, three of whom are active serial entrepreneurs in dual institutional roles, providing practitioner-embedded perspectives alongside institutional viewpoints. The findings reveal a functionally active yet structurally misaligned ecosystem in which no formal institutional pathway targets serial entrepreneurship as a distinct support category. General-purpose institutions, including the National Incubation Centers, SMEDA, and the Bank of Punjab, provide essential but non-scalable support, while informal social capital mechanisms such as kinship networks (Baradi) and resourceful improvisation (Jugaar) substitute for absent formal provision in ways that are inequitable and invisible to policy design. This study introduces the concept of a Serial Entrepreneurship Support Void at the transition stage between venture failure-exit and new venture re-entry and proposes the Institutional Ecosystem Support Model for Serial Entrepreneurs in Compound-Uncertainty Environments as its primary theoretical contribution. Three theoretical propositions are advanced and situated within comparative evidence from Nigeria, Egypt, Vietnam, and Bangladesh, positioning the study within a broader emerging economy scholarship. The findings indicate that serial entrepreneurship must be recognized as a distinct institutional demand category within Pakistan's SME policy framework, and that ecosystem resilience under compound uncertainty requires purposefully designed re-entry programming rather than expanded general startup support.
Keywords
Serial entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial ecosystem
Downloads
References
1. Afshan, G., Shahid, S., & Tunio, M. N. (2021). Learning experiences of women entrepreneurs amidst COVID-19. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-09-2020-0153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anwar, M., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2021). Entrepreneurial orientation and generic competitive strategies for emerging SMEs: Financial and nonfinancial performance perspective. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(1), e2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2021). Towards an entrepreneurial ecosystem typology for regional economic development: The role of creative class and entrepreneurship. Regional Studies, 55(4), 735–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1854711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Audretsch, D. B., & Fiedler, A. (2022). The Vietnamese entrepreneurship paradox: How can entrepreneurs thrive without political and economic freedom? Journal of Technology Transfer, 47, 1179–1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09873-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Clayton, P., Feldman, M., & Lowe, N. (2018). Behind the scenes: Intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2020). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods, 32(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X19887155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hausberg, J. P., & Korreck, S. (2020). Business incubators and accelerators: A co-citation analysis-based systematic literature review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9651-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hussein, H. S., & Awad, A. B. (2021). Entrepreneurship ecosystem performance in Egypt: An empirical study based on the Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI). Sustainability, 13(13), 7171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Igwe, P. A., Odunukan, K., Rahman, M., Rugara, D. G., & Ochinanwata, C. (2020). How entrepreneurship ecosystem influences the development of frugal innovation and informal entrepreneurship? Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(5), 475–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Isenberg, D. J. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, Babson College. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Jan, S. Q., Junfeng, J., Iqbal, M. B., Raza, A., Naz, M., & Bhatt, T. K. (2025). The impact of entrepreneurial ecosystems and sustainable digital innovation on business performance: a study of Gilgit-Baltistan Pakistan. Frontiers in Sustainability, 6, 1485680. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Kakakhail, S. J. (2025). Assessing the entrepreneurial ecosystem in Pakistan: A review to finance, education, and human capital for entrepreneurs. Social Science Review Archives, 3(1), 1849-1860. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kumar, M. (2020). Entrepreneurship ecosystem and development of entrepreneurship in Pakistan. Open Journal of Business and Management, 8(4), 1734-1770. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Memon, A. (2020). Analyzing the entrepreneurial ecosystem for women entrepreneurs: A study of rural Jamshoro, Pakistan. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 11(3), 45-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Memon, S. B., Mirani, S. H., Mahar, S. A., Kumar, M., Soomro, M. A., & Zuhaibuddin, A. (2019). Influence of entrepreneurship ecosystem on economic growth of Pakistan. IJCSNS, 19(11), 228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Mujahid, S., Mubarik, S., & Naghavi, N. (2019). Prioritizing dimensions of entrepreneurial ecosystem: a proposed framework. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Nair, S., & Blomquist, T. (2019). Failure management in entrepreneurial ecosystems: A study of venture failure. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(S2), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Parker, S. C. (2013). Do serial entrepreneurs run successively better-performing businesses? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.08.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Qamar, U., Tanveer, F., Ansari, N., Qamar, N., & Gull, S. (2023). Role of government in making entrepreneurial ecosystem conducive in Pakistan: Case of emerging businesses. Journal of Management and Research, 10(2), 1-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Qureshi, S., Hassan, S. Z., & Mian, S. A. (2021). Business incubation and acceleration in Pakistan: an entrepreneurship ecosystem development approach. In Handbook of research on business and technology incubation and acceleration (pp. 280-298). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Roundy, P. T., Brockman, B. K., & Bradshaw, M. (2018). The resilience of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8, 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.08.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Samiullah, A. S., & Ahmad, T. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem and performance of SMEs in Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 9(2), 192-204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Siddiqui, K.A., Emad Al-Shaikh, M., Bajwa, I.A., Al-Subaie, A. (2021). Identifying critical success factors for university business incubators in Saudi Arabia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(3), 267-279. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.8.3(15) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Tunio, M. N. (2020). Role of ICT in promoting entrepreneurial ecosystems in Pakistan. Journal of Business Ecosystems (JBE), 1(2), 1-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2008). Opportunity identification and pursuit: Does an entrepreneur's human capital matter? Small Business Economics, 30(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9020-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Webb, J. W., Khoury, T. A., & Hitt, M. A. (2020). The influence of formal and informal institutional voids on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(3), 504-526. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and design methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Zaidi, R. A., Khan, M. M., Khan, R. A., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2023). Do entrepreneurship ecosystem and managerial skills contribute to startup development? South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 12(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-07-2020-0233 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria