Needs Assessment of Students at Risk of Dropping Out in MAPEH: Basis for Student Retention Strategy

Authors

Angelie C. Garcia

Nueva Vizcaya State University, Bayombong Campus, Nueva Vizcaya (Philippines)

Jay Lord G. Piduana

Nueva Vizcaya State University, Bayombong Campus, Nueva Vizcaya (Philippines)

Michael Francis C. Garma

Nueva Vizcaya State University, Bayombong Campus, Nueva Vizcaya (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600425

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 6078-6107

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-03

Accepted: 2026-06-08

Published: 2026-06-25

Abstract

Student dropout remains a continuing challenge in secondary education, particularly among learners who gradually disengage due to unmet needs and persistent difficulties. This study assessed the needs and challenges of students at risk of dropping out in Music, Arts, Physical Education, and Health (MAPEH) at Nueva Vizcaya General Comprehensive High School during the School Year 2025-2026, with the end view of developing a student retention strategy. A descriptive survey research design was utilized, and data were gathered through a researcher-made questionnaire administered to identified students at risk of dropping out. The instrument measured students’ levels of needs in terms of personal, academic, social, financial/material, family support, and teachers’/school support, as well as the extent of challenges experienced across personal, academic, social, financial, family-related, and school environment/teacher-related domains. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical tools. The findings revealed that students at risk of dropping out exhibited a high level of needs across all dimensions, with academic support, social interaction, family encouragement, and teacher guidance emerging as priority areas. Meanwhile, the extent of challenges experienced by the learners was generally moderate, particularly in relation to performance-based tasks, confidence during activities, access to learning materials, and balancing academic demands with family responsibilities. These results indicate that while the challenges are manageable, they require timely and targeted interventions to prevent further disengagement and potential dropout. Based on the findings, a Student Retention Strategy in MAPEH was developed. The strategy emphasizes holistic and learner-centered interventions that respond to identified needs and challenges. It is recommended that the school implement and continuously evaluate this strategy to strengthen learner engagement and promote sustained participation in performance-based learning areas such as MAPEH.

Keywords

Disengagement, Dropout, Learner Needs, Support, Retention Program

Downloads

References

1. Abrigo, M. R. M., & Orbeta, A. C. (2023). Basic education in the Philippines: Quality is the “now” frontier (Policy Notes No. 2023 16). Philippine Institute for Development Studies; Second Congressional Commission on Education. https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2023/10/pidspn2316.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allen, K. A., Kern, M. L., Vella Brodrick, D., Hattie, J., & Waters, L. (2018). What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9389-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ariola, E. A., Abao, G. M., & Bautista, M. A. (2025). Teachers’ motivation, difficulties, and performance in teaching MAPEH in public secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 14(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bowers, A. J., Sprott, R., & Taff, S. A. (2013). Do we know who will drop out? A review of the predictors of dropping out of high school: Precision, sensitivity, and specificity. The High School Journal, 96(2), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2013.0000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cabural, A. B. (2024). Beyond benchmarking: A diagnostic inquiry into the underlying determinants of low performance in Philippine PISA science. Journal of Tertiary Education and Learning, 2(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v2i3.3063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Department of Education. (2023). Basic education statistics and indicators. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015362 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jeynes, W. H. (2016). A meta analysis on the effects of parental involvement on students’ outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 345–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9312-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Loranas, V. S., Serviñas, L. P., & Eslabon, L. B. (2024). Implementation, support system, and difficulties of MAPEH programs in public secondary schools. Journal of Educational Practice and Policy, 9(1), 82–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Organisation for Economic Co operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Parreño, S. J. (2023). School dropouts in the Philippines: Causes, changes, and statistics. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v4i1.552 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ronquillo, K. T. (2023). Challenges and difficulties of MAPEH teachers in public secondary schools. Department of Education Division of Bataan. https://depedbataan.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rumberger, R. W. (2011). Dropping out: Why students drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Second Congressional Commission on Education. (2026). Student proficiency rates across grade levels: Key findings and implications. https://edcom2.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Shields, M., & Miles, A. (2018). Student participation and engagement in physical education and arts based learning. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(5), 504–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1470613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2020). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 450–467. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sutton, A., Langenkamp, A. G., Muller, C., & Schiller, K. S. (2019). Who stays and who drops out? Understanding student persistence in high school. Sociology of Education, 92(4), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040719872899 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Cognitive load theory (2nd ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tinto, V. (2017). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254–269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621917 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. UNESCO. (2015). Education for all 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2016). School engagement, self concept, and academic achievement: A longitudinal study of mediational processes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(9), 1901–1916. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0451-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Wentzel, K. R. (2010). Students’ relationships with teachers as motivational contexts. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 16(2), 79–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles