Online Learning Motivation and ChatGPT: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective

Growing use of generative AI technologies like ChatGPT has changed online learning and increased student motivation. This study explores online learning motivation and ChatGPT using Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to examine competence, autonomy, and relatedness in online learners. 189 academics from various fields participated in a quantitative survey. A five-point Likert scale-based 52-item questionnaire was derived from Ryan and Deci (2000), Fowler (2018), and Youssef et al. (2024). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness were not gender-specific across academic groupings. In the descriptive study, students rated the AI system's function in critical thinking, academic accomplishment, engagement, and learning motivation positively. The greatest competency item was students' practice of cross-checking ChatGPT knowledge with independent study (M = 4.06), whereas the most autonomous item was achieving good grades (M = 4.59). Relatedness was strong in social engagement and teacher support. They liked class discussions (M = 4.00) and found course materials meaningful (M = 4.28). Positive correlations were found between competence, autonomy (r =.550, p <.001), and competence and relatedness (r =.551, p <.001). The results support the Self-Determination Theory as a valid framework for online learning motivation and show that ChatGPT can promote learners' competence, autonomy, and relatedness if responsibly integrated into online learning settings. The work has major theoretical, pedagogical, and practical consequences for higher education AI-assisted learning.

Online Learning Motivation, ChatGPT, Self-Determination Theory (SDT), Student Engagement, Higher Education

1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024) Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-L earning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Fowler,S. (2018) The Motivation to learn Online Questionnaire. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation. Graduate Faculty, The University of Georgia. Retrieved from https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/fowler_kevin_s_201805_phd.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study if Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Rahmat,N.H. (2025) The Influence of Value Components in Online Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 15(7), 1060-1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.46886/IJAREG/v15-i7/17336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Vetter, T.R. (2017). Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When , Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesth Analg, 12595), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Youssef, E., Medhat,M., Abdellatif,S., & Al Malek,M. (2024) Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman,UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(Dec 2024), 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C.. (202) Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Al-khresheh, M. H. (2024). Revisiting the use of ChatGPT in English language education: A systematic review of benefits and pedagogical challenges. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. AlAfnan, M. A., Samira Dishari, Marina Jovic, & Koba Lomidze. (2023). ChatGPT as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Albadarin, Y., et al. (2024). Empowering language learners: Empirical insights into ChatGPT’s role in promoting learner autonomy and engagement. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Alsaedi, N. (2024). ChatGPT and EFL/ESL writing: A systematic review of advantages and challenges. English Language Teaching, 17(5), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v17n5p41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Athaluri, S. A., Manthena, S. V., Kesapragada, V. S. R., Yarlagadda, V., Dave, T., & Duddumpudi, R. T. S. (2023). Exploring the boundaries of reality: Investigating the phenomenon of artificial intelligence hallucination in scientific writing through ChatGPT references. Cureus, 15(4), e37432. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dimeli, M., & Kostas, A. (2025). The role of ChatGPT in education: Applications, challenges: Insights from a systematic review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 24, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.28945/5422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dos, J. (2025). Determinants of continuous use intention: An empirical study of ChatGPT among students in German higher education (Master's dissertation, Universidade Católica Portuguesa). Católica Repository. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Fatima, S., et al. (2024). Generative AI in medical learning environments: A systematic review of ChatGPT's integration, advantages, and ethical boundaries. Frontiers in Medical Technology, 6, Article 134567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Garg, P., et al. (2023). ChatGPT in medical education: Bibliometric and visual analysis of opportunities and emerging limitations. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e49877. https://doi.org/10.2196/49877 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Iqbal, M., et al. (2025). Global sentiment toward health AI at the dawn of the ChatGPT era: Empirical analysis of social discourse. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e80346. https://doi.org/10.2196/80346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lee, H. Y., Huang, Y. M., & Wu, T. T. (2025). ChatGPT in education: A systematic review of current landscape, limitations and future directions through General System Theory. Educational Technology & Society. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Natya, K., et al. (2024). Supplemental AI: Why ChatGPT cannot substitute human instructors in complex creative problem-solving. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 44–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Neha, S., et al. (2024). Alleviating language barriers and optimizing clinical workflows: The utility of large language models in healthcare literature. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 148, Article 102789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Samala, A. D., et al. (2024). Automated assessment and personalized feedback: A systematic review on reducing instructor workloads via generative AI platforms. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Shah, M.A.(2024). Meaning and Statistical Analysis of T-Tests in SPSS. Journal of Saidu Medical College, 14(1), 64–65. https://doi.org/10.52206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with generative artificial intelligence by applying self-determination theory: a case of ChatGPT. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 2401-2416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Daher, W., Anabousy, A., Amer, A., & Issa, N. (2026). Students’ Motivation for Online Learning of English as a Second Language Through the Lens of the Self-Determination Theory. Higher Learning Research Communications, 16 (1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Du, J., & Alm, A. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on English for Academic Purposes (EAP) students’ language learning experience: A self-determination theory perspective. Education Sciences, 14(7), 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Harder, J. A. (2026). Not just answers: ChatGPT's expanding role in supporting student motivation. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202604.0497.v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Annamalai, N., Bervell, B., Mireku, D. O., & Andoh, R. P. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Modelling students' motivation for continuous use of ChatGPT based on a modified self-determination theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hartnett, M. (2015). Influences that undermine learners' perceptions of autonomy, competence and relatedness in an online context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.1526 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hmoud, M., Swaity, H., Hamad, N., Karram, O., & Daher, W. M. (2024). Higher education students' task motivation in the generative artificial intelligence context: The case of ChatGPT. Information, 15(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rosli, M., Saleh, N. S., Ali, A. M., & Bakar, S. A. (2022). Self-determination theory and online learning in university: Advancements, future direction and research gaps. Sustainability, 14(21), 14655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Shank, E., Tang, H., & Morris, W. (2024). Motivation in online course design using self-determination theory: An action research study in a secondary mathematics course. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10410-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Shah, C. S., Mathur, S., & Vishnoi, S. K. (2024). Is ChatGPT enhancing youth’s learning, engagement and satisfaction? Journal of Computational Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2024.2380698 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mo, F., Huang, J., Yang, Y., Ozen, Z., Maeda, Y., & Olenchak, F. R. (2026). Undergraduate students’ learning outcomes with ChatGPT: A meta-analytic study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10, 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100536 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Stratton-Maher, D., & Kelly, J. (2026). Learning with AI, not from AI: Ethical and pedagogical implications of ChatGPT in undergraduate education. Nurse Education Today, 158, 106961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Mehrvarz, M., Salimi, G., Abdoli, S., & McLaren, B. M. (2025). How does students’ perception of ChatGPT shape online learning engagement and performance? Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, Article 100459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100459 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mahande, R. D., Fakhri, M. M., Suwahyu, I., & Sulaiman, D. R. A. (2026). Unveiling the impact of ChatGPT: Investigating self-efficacy, anxiety and motivation on student performance in blended learning environments. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 18(1), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2024-0372 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study