Online Mathematics Classrooms as Performative Spaces: A Goffman-Garfinkel Framework

Authors

Marius Simons

University of the Western Cape, South Africa (South Africa)

Wandile Mangcengeza

University of the Western Cape, South Africa (South Africa)

Kwanele Booi

University of the Western Cape, South Africa (South Africa)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100271

Subject Category: Mathematics

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 3395-3407

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-10

Accepted: 2025-11-20

Published: 2025-12-06

Abstract

This article explores how undergraduate online mathematics classrooms at South African universities function as performative spaces shaped by visibility, role expectations, and social accountability. The sudden shift to digital learning platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed logistical and infrastructural gaps, raising important questions about identity, participation, and maintaining classroom order. Although the transition to remote teaching was often seen as a technological or pedagogical challenge, this research approaches it from a sociological perspective by analysing the subtle ways in which order is preserved in digitally mediated environments. Using the frameworks of Erving Goffman's dramaturgical sociology and Harold Garfinkel's ethnomethodology, the study examines how lecturers and students in online mathematics classrooms perform, manage, and interpret social interactions through platforms such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and institutional learning management systems. Based on data from three South African universities—including video recordings, chat logs, WhatsApp group conversations, interviews, and fieldnotes—the research identifies key interaction patterns: self-presentation strategies, repair routines following breaches of background expectancies, and backstage cooperation among students to sustain participation. The findings indicate that these classrooms are more than simple channels for delivering content; they are socially dynamic environments where meaning, legitimacy, and accountability are co-constructed in real-time. The study also highlights the complex emotional labour and identity negotiations involved in engagement by students and lecturers, especially under pressures such as exposure, technological surveillance, and asynchronous misunderstandings. Viewing online mathematics classrooms as performatively and interactionally structured, the article calls for a broader re-evaluation of digital pedagogy that extends beyond mere access and assessment to focus on the everyday micro-practices that uphold educational meaning and order.

Keywords

Ethnomethodology, Dramaturgical Sociology, Micro-practices, Digital Learning

Downloads

References

1. Bayne, S., Gallagher, M. S., & Lamb, J. (2020). An entangled pedagogy: Hybrid teaching and the socio-materiality of learning. Post Digital Science and Education, 2(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00067-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Borba, M. C., Engelbrecht, J., Llinares, S., & Kaiser, G. (2021). Mathematics education research during the COVID-19 pandemic: Opportunities and challenges. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10076-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, D., & Rodes, V. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to the COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., Badenhorst, J., Belluigi, D., Chambers, T., Chili, M., de Villiers, M., Felix, A., Gachago, D., Gokool, S., & Madiba, M. (2020). A wake-up call: Equity, inequality and COVID-19 emergency remote teaching and learning. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Engelbrecht, J., Borba, M. C., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Will 2020 be remembered as the year in which education was changed? ("Will 2020 be remembered as the year in which education was ... - PubMed") ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(6), 821–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01183-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday Anchor Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Green, J. K., Burrow, M. S., & Carvalho, L. (2021). "Designing for transition: Supporting teachers and students cope with emergency remote education." ("Marla Burrow - Lecturer - Massey University") Postdigital Science and Education, 3, 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00184-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200002X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behaviour. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles