Operational Readiness of Personnel and Implementation of Jail Perimeter Security Protocols

This study, conducted in 2026 across five district jails under the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) Region VI, examined the relationship between the operational readiness of custodial personnel and the implementation of jail perimeter security protocols. A total of 117 custodial personnel served as respondents, whose demographic profile was analyzed in terms of age, sex, rank or position, length of service, educational attainment, and number of security-related trainings attended. To collect data, the researcher developed a structured questionnaire specifically designed to measure operational readiness and protocol implementation. The instrument underwent content validation through expert evaluation using Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio, which confirmed its adequacy and relevance to the study variables. Reliability testing was likewise conducted using Cronbach’s Alpha, yielding coefficients that indicated strong internal consistency across the dimensions of the tool, thereby ensuring the accuracy and dependability of the results. Findings revealed that personnel exhibited moderate to high levels of operational readiness, particularly in knowledge of security protocols, emergency response preparedness, physical readiness, communication and coordination, and security skills and competency. The implementation of jail perimeter security protocols was likewise rated effective, covering access control, visitor screening, guard deployment, surveillance, and emergency measures. Statistical analysis confirmed a significant positive relationship between operational readiness and the extent of protocol implementation, underscoring the critical role of personnel preparedness in ensuring effective jail security operations and institutional safety. By integrating validated and reliable measures, this study contributes to correctional management literature and offers practical insights for policymakers and jail administrators in strengthening security frameworks.

Operational Readiness, Custodial Personnel, Jail Perimeter Security

1. Almazan, B. C. H., Catugal, J. L., Largo, C. A., Paglinawan, L. B. J., Culanag, T. Y., & Cuevas, J. F., Jr. (2022). Level of preparedness of the school security personnel and their qualifications towards institutional security. Mediterranean Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(2), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.46382/MJBAS.2022.6210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bureau of Jail Management and Penology. (2023). General Appropriations Act, FY 2023: Performance information and strategic objectives. Department of the Interior and Local Government, Official Gazette. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Garcia, M., & Reyes, J. (2022). Conditions of correctional facilities in the Philippines: Jail wardens’ perspectives and experiences. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 12(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v12i1.6531 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gonzales, J., & Reyes, A. (2022). Social support, emotional intelligence and political skills: A structural equation model on resilience of jail officers in Region XI. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(11), 433–494. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7374978 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hernandez, R. F. (2021). Disaster vulnerability assessment of selected jails under Bureau of Jail Management and Penology in CALABARZON. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4643650 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hernandez, R. F., & Ingco, R. M. (2021). Disaster vulnerability assessment of selected jails under Bureau of Jail Management and Penology in CALABARZON. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4643655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Limyoco, L. O. (2025). Enhancing efficiency and security: A study of automated visitors monitoring system in the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 5(4), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.53378/ijstem.353275 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lopez, H. G. N. (2021). Diskarte lang: Dealing with operational challenges in a Philippine city jail. Social Transformations: Journal of the Global South, 9(1), 159–194. https://doi.org/10.13185/ST2021.09108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Manahan, K. M. S., De Guzman, A. R., Segarra, A. B., Sucaldito, M. N., & Martinez, R. E. C. (2024). Establishing an early warning surveillance system in jails in Calabarzon, the Philippines, 2021. Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal, 15(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2024.15.2.1083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Manahan, K. M. S., De Guzman, A. R., Segarra, A. B., Sucaldito, M. N., & Martinez, R. E. C. (2024). Establishing an early warning surveillance system in jails in Calabarzon, the Philippines, 2021. Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal, 15(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2024.15.2.1083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Martinez, R. (2023). Practical aspects of perimeter intrusion detection and nuisance suppression for distributed fiber-optic sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(4), 1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3245678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Philippine National Police. (2021). Philippine National Police operational procedures manual (PNPM-DO-D-0-2-13-21). Directorate for Operations, Camp BGen Rafael T. Crame, Quezon City, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Shukla, R., Robin, L., Peterson, B. E., & Lawrence, D. S. (2021). Optimizing surveillance systems in correctional settings: A guide for enhancing safety and security. Urban Institute. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403420979178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Smith, H. P., & Brown, K. (2021). Introduction to the special edition on correctional officer wellness and resiliency. Criminal Justice Studies, 34(4), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2021.1996548 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2022). World drug report 2022. United Nations publication. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210019545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
• Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
• Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
• Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
• The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark