Originality as the Cornerstone of Copyright Protection in Cameroon’s Creative Industries

Authors

Yvette Mambo

Research Fellow, Faculty of Laws and Political Science, University of Yaoundé II (Cameroon)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200381

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 5142-5154

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-22

Accepted: 2026-02-28

Published: 2026-03-12

Abstract

This study critically examines the application of originality in Cameroon’s copyright framework, revealing both doctrinal gaps and practical enforcement challenges. While originality is the cornerstone of copyright law, Cameroonian courts and collective management bodies such as SOCAM often rely on vague references to “intellectual imprint,” producing inconsistent outcomes. The research proposes a Cameroon-ready originality test independent creation plus a minimal creative choice that is doctrinally precise yet culturally sensitive, ensuring protection across literary, musical, visual, and performance works.
The findings highlight several tensions. State custodianship of folklore under Law No. 2000/011 preserves cultural heritage but risks stifling innovation unless modern adaptations are recognized as original works. Derivative works such as translations, compilations, and adaptations demonstrate originality through selection, arrangement, and interpretive transformation, yet remain underappreciated in practice. Emerging technologies further complicate the landscape as AI-generated outputs lack human authorship and cannot qualify for protection, while AI-assisted works may satisfy originality when human contributors exercise creative control.
Enforcement mechanisms remain fragmented. Civil remedies are underutilized, criminal sanctions rarely applied, OAPI’s role limited to registration, and SOCAM weakened by governance challenges. Online enforcement is particularly underdeveloped, leaving creators vulnerable to digital piracy. To address these weaknesses, the study proposes reforms including strengthening SOCAM governance, specialized judicial training, streamlined evidentiary procedures, and the development of online enforcement mechanisms.
By linking doctrinal clarity to practical enforcement, Cameroon can safeguard cultural identity, support innovation, and strengthen its creative economy. More broadly, these reforms position Cameroon as an active participant in global copyright debates, demonstrating that African jurisdictions can contribute original doctrinal solutions to the challenges of authorship, originality, and technological change.

Keywords

Social Sciences (Intellectual Property Law)

Downloads

References

1. Cameroon. (2000). Law No. 2000/011 of December 19, 2000 on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights. Official Gazette of the Republic of Cameroon. Retrieved from WIPO Lex. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service, 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Fombad, C. M. (2017). Copyright and cultural heritage in Africa: Balancing preservation and innovation. African Journal of Legal Studies, 10(2), 145–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ginsburg, J. C. (2018). Originality in copyright law: A comparative perspective. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 41(3), 327–356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades Forening, Case C-5/08, [2009] ECR I-6569. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ngassa, J. (2019). Copyright enforcement in Cameroon: Challenges and prospects. Revue Camerounaise de Droit, 12(1), 45–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Organisation Africaine de la Propriété Intellectuelle (OAPI). (2000). Bangui Agreement on the Creation of OAPI, Annex VII: Copyright. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Samuelson, P. (2022). Authorship and AI: Rethinking originality thresholds. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 37(1), 1–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Senftleben, M. (2020). The EU originality standard: Author’s own intellectual creation revisited. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15(4), 267–278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles