Pandemic Paradox: Positive Effects of COVID-19 on Marine Fisheries in Indian Coastal States
Authors
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (India)
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (India)
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (India)
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (India)
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (India)
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (India)
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (India)
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800838
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 12343-12359
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-11
Accepted: 2026-09-17
Published: 2026-09-18
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic, while significantly disrupting the global marine fisheries sector, also presented unique opportunities for positive change. This study moves beyond the prevailing crisis narrative to investigate the beneficial externalities that emerged across India's nine coastal states. Framing the pandemic as a “punctuation" in the sector's equilibrium, we explore how this shock created a "window of opportunity" for adaptation and resilience. Our research is based on a comprehensive pan-Indian survey of 3360 stakeholders, including boat owners, labourers, traders, and women, across 14 strategically chosen coastal districts. We analyzed five key positive impacts, differentiating between temporary and continuing benefits to assess the durability of adaptive shifts. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis was employed to group states and stakeholders based on their shared impact profiles, and these empirical groupings were integrated into a four-quadrant adaptation typology. Our findings reveal significant variation. At the state level, Kerala and Tamil Nadu emerged as 'Strategic Transformers,' enacting deep structural reforms. A second cluster including Gujarat and Maharashtra followed an 'Incipient Transformation' pathway, while West Bengal and Odisha demonstrated 'Nascent Adaptation.' At the stakeholder level, boat owners and traders were identified as 'Strategic Transformers,' leveraging the crisis for long-term reinvestment. Labourers and exporters were 'Emerging Adapters,' focusing on foundational skill-building and new market development. Women and consumers followed an 'Incipient Transformation' path, centered on immediate household well-being. Significantly, no group fell into the lowest adaptation category. The study concludes that the pandemic, despite its challenges, illuminated clear pathways toward a more resilient and equitable fisheries sector. The key policy implication is the urgent need to institutionalize these positive, crisis-induced adaptations to ensure they lead to lasting, structural transformation rather than a return to the pre-pandemic status quo
Keywords
COVID-19 Marine fisheries Positive externalities, Punctuated Equilibrium, Stakeholder analysis, Coastal states in India, Cluster analysis
Downloads
References
1. Ajduković, M., Rezo Bagarić, I., & Ajduković, D. (2022). Is there anything good about the COVID-19 pandemic? Perceptions of the positive consequences at the beginning of the pandemic. Psihologijske Teme, 31(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.31.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anuja, A. R., Salim, S. S., Kumaran, A., Narayanakumar, R., Jayasankar, J., & Aswathy, N. (2025). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the marine fisheries sector. Marine Policy, 180, 106776. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bavinck, M., Roy, S., & Joffre, O. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and small-scale fisheries in India: Impacts and responses. Marine Policy, 129, 104524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Béné, C. (2020). Resilience of local food systems and links to food security – A review of the literature. Food Security, 12(4), 795-810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bennett, N. J., et al. (2020). The perfect storm: COVID-19, climate change, and the future of small-scale fisheries. Maritime Studies, 19(2), 125-134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Campbell, N., Thompson, S. C., Tynan, A., Townsin, L., Booker, L. A., & Argus, G. (2021). Silver linings reported by Australians experiencing public health restrictions during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative report. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Charles Jeeva, J., Ambasankar, K., & Sundaray, J. K. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 on Indian aquaculture and fisheries sector: A review. Journal of Fisheries and Environment, 47(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Charles Jeeva, J., Ananthan, P. S., Edison, L. J., Ranjith, K. P. G., Hatha, A. A. M., Niharika, K. R., & Rajesh, R. (2023). The impact of COVID 19 pandemic on marine fisheries sector: A case study from Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 70(3), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Colgan, A., Ebersole, M., & Kelly, M. (2022). Essential workers and the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of the literature. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 28(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Eid, J., Bøhn, E. K., Guderud, M. R., Rath, T. M., & Sætrevik, B. (2024). A qualitative study of the psychological effects of quarantine as an infection control measure in Norway. Current Psychology, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06162-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Fan, S., Briones, E., & Longhurst, J. (2020). COVID-19 and food systems in the Global South: Challenges and opportunities. Food Security, 12(4), 693-696. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Gierszewski, D., Kluzowicz, J., & Opozda-Suder, S. (2022). Engagement, community, activity, and helpfulness as predictors of social solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. Przestrzeń Społeczna (Social Space), 22(3), 1–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Helgeson, V. S., Reynolds, K. A., & Tomich, P. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 797–816. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.797 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hossain, M. B., Shamsuddin, M., Rahman, M., Tazim, M. F., Ali, M. R., & Kawla, M. S. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Fisheries Sector and Actions Taken to Cope with the Situation: A Case Study from a Top Fish-Producing Country. Sustainability, 15(4), 3605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043605 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hughes, T. P., et al. (2020). Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature, 543(7645), 373-377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2020). ILO monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work. Third edition. Updated estimates and analysis. ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Jayanandan, D., & Nair, K. N. (2023). Resilience of Indian Marine Fisheries Sector to COVID-19 Pandemic. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 19(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Jayasankar, J., & Jayaraman, R. (2021). Socio-economic impacts of COVID-19 on marine fishing communities of Kerala, India. Fisheries Research, 238, 105872. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Krajewski, M., Frąckowiak, M., Kubacka, M., & Rogowski, Ł. (2021). The bright side of the crisis. The positive aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic according to the Poles. European Societies, 23(S1), 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1836387 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Kumar, S., Chandrakandan, K., & Ramachandran, M. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on fishing communities in Tamil Nadu. Journal of Coastal Research, 38(3), 643-649. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Maiti, S. K. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on Indian agriculture. e Journal of Oriental Research Madras, 433-444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Mohanty, R. K., Pattanaik, B. B., Rout, S. K., & Dash, S. S. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on gender roles and empowerment in fishing communities of Odisha, India. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 9(3), 160-164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Praveen, K., Jayanthi, R., & Karthikeyan, S. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on marine fish export from India: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 13(2), 522-526. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Reitsma, L., Mooren, T., Mouthaan, J., Pociunaite, J., Van Hoof, M. J., Groen, S., ... & Lenferink, L. I. (2024). Trajectories of DSM-5-TR Prolonged Grief Disorder severity in the first two years after loss during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Affective Disorders, 349, 436-444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Rothman, S., Gunturu, S., & Korenis, P. (2020). The mental health impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on immigrants and racial and ethnic minorities. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 113(11), 779–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Salim, S. S., Akhila, K., Athira, N. R., Anuja, A. R., & Narayanakumar, R. (2023). Factors Influencing Source of Coping Strategies in Health in Marine Fishers During COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study of Kerala, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Sarkki, S., et al. (2021). Windows of opportunity for sustainability in the Arctic: A synthesis of the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 oil price crash. Global Environmental Change, 68, 102258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Sathiavelu, M., Shanmugam, S. A., & Kumaran, M. (2022). Challenges and coping strategies of fish marketing functionaries during COVID-19 pandemic in Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 10(3), 108-112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Shafi, M., Liu, J., & Ren, W. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on micro, small, and medium-sized Enterprises operating in Pakistan. Research in Globalization, 2, 100018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Shaw, D., Brahim, T., & Chang Martinez, C. (2021). Could there be a good side to COVID-19 pandemic? Nursing & Health Sciences Research Journal, 4(1), 89–93. https://scholarlycommons.baptisthealth.net/nhsrj/vol4/iss1/13/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Shyam, S. S., Anuja, A. R., Athira, N. R., & Kumaran, A. (2023). Fish consumption in Kerala: Externalities and lessons learned during COVID pandemic. Journal of Inland Fisheries Society of India, 55(4), 439-450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Suresh, A., Sajesh, V. K., Mohanty, A. K., & Ravishankar, C. N. (2024). Market Reforms of Marine Fisheries During COVID-19 in Kerala: Implications for Sustainable Management. Fishery Technology, 61, 63-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Švab, A., & Oblak Črnič, T. (2023). Gender differences in epidemic everyday scenarios: An exploratory study of family life in Slovenia. Social Inclusion, 11(1), 324–336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Vipindas, P. V., et al. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the socio-economic status of fishermen in Kerala, India. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 63(1), 89-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Vivekanandan, E., Rajkumar, M., & Immanuel, S. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on marine fisheries in India. Current Science, 119(11), 1735-1738. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Zrnić Novaković, I., Lueger-Schuster, B., Verginer, L., Bakić, H., Ajduković, D., Borges, C., ... & Lotzin, A. (2022). You can't do anything about it but you can make the best of it: A qualitative analysis of pandemic-related experiences in six European countries. PLOS ONE, 17(9), e0274989. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria