Peace or a Peace Agreement? Negative Peace, Ripeness, and the Persistence of the Cyprus Status Quo

This article addresses a puzzle at the centre of the Cyprus conflict. Although successive settlement texts have been negotiated and provisionally agreed since 1977, none has entered into force, yet the island has experienced no sustained direct intercommunal violence for more than four decades. Drawing on Johan Galtung's distinction between negative and positive peace and on I. William Zartman's ripeness theory, the study argues that Cyprus has achieved a durable negative peace, and that the recurrent collapse of settlement agreements is better explained by the absence of a mutually hurting stalemate than by any deficiency of diplomatic effort. The argument is examined across three critical junctures, namely the post-war period of 1974 and 1975, the 1992 Set of Ideas and the 2004 Annan Plan. In each case the failure tracks the absence of ripeness rather than a shortfall of diplomatic effort or design. The later collapse at Crans-Montana in 2017 is consistent with the same reading. Methodologically, the article is a qualitative single-case study that combines documentary and qualitative content analysis of treaties, United Nations (UN) resolutions and negotiation texts with process tracing of the sequence of agreed but unimplemented settlements. The analysis suggests that pressing toward a comprehensive settlement in the absence of ripeness may itself strain the negative peace it seeks to formalise. Whether the existing status quo ought to be formally institutionalised is treated as a separate and explicitly normative question rather than as a finding of the analysis.

Cyprus problem, negative peace, ripeness theory, negotiation process, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

1. Akçura, E. (2009). Türklere uyguladıkları Kıbrıs Türkünün bağımsızlık mücadelesi ve Rumların katliam. Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Dergisi, (179). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, İ. (2002). Hatıralarım. Galeri Kültür Yayınları. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Birinci, E. M. (1999). M. Necati Özkan (1899–1970) (Vol. 3). Umut Matbaası. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ergüven, H., & Köprülü, N. (2023). Back to basics: The re-securitization of Cyprus by Turkey after Crans Montana. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 25(6), 1057–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2023.2167341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Evans, G., & Newnham, J. (2007). Uluslararası ilişkiler sözlüğü (H. A. Utku, Trans.). Gökkubbe Yayınları. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gazioğlu, A. (1960). İngiliz idaresinde Kıbrıs 1878–1960 (Vol. 1). Ekin Basımevi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gibbons, H. S. (1997). The genocide files. Charles Bravos Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Grivas, G. (2012). General Grivas – Hayatım (C. Atay, Trans.). Kalkedon Yayınları. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gürel, A. (2012). Kıbrıs’ta yerinden olmak: Sivil ve askeri çatışmanın sonuçları (Report No. 4). Peace Research Institute Oslo. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hasgüler, M., & Özkaleli, M. F. (2010). Kıbrıs’ta metamorfoz ve paradigma değişimi. USAK Yayınları. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. İsmail, S. (1992a). 100 soruda Kıbrıs sorunu. Dilhan Offset. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. İsmail, S. (1992b). Kıbrıs Cumhuriyeti’nin doğuşu ve çöküşü ve KKTC’nin kuruluşu (1960–1983). Akdeniz Haber Ajansı Yayınları. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Karyelioğlu, S. (2012). Ulus devlet ve milliyetçiliğin tarihsel dayanakları ve küreselleşmenin etkileri. Ethos Dergisi, 5(1), 137–169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ker-Lindsay, J. (2011). The Cyprus problem: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kızılyürek, N. (2005). Doğmamış bir devletin tarihi: Birleşik Kıbrıs Cumhuriyeti. İletişim Yayınları. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Michael, M. S. (2009). Resolving the Cyprus conflict: Negotiating history. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mütercimler, E. (1990). Kıbrıs Barış Harekatının bilinmeyen yönleri. Yaprak Yayınevi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mütercimler, E. (2007). Satılık ada Kıbrıs. Melisa Matbaacılık. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sözen, A., & Şahin, D. (2024). Renewing hope for Cyprus peace: A novel approach to reconcile the negotiation positions of the Turkish Cypriot side and the Greek Cypriot side. New Perspectives on Turkey. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2024.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tocci, N. (2004). EU accession dynamics and conflict resolution: Catalysing peace or consolidating partition in Cyprus? Ashgate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Toluner, S. (1977). Kıbrıs uyuşmazlığı ve milletlerarası hukuk (Hukuk Fakültesi No. 527). İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zartman, I. W. (1989). Ripe for resolution: Conflict and intervention in Africa. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zartman, I. W. (2001). The timing of peace initiatives: Hurting stalemates and ripe moments. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 1(1), 8–18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]