Pedagogical Content Knowledge Alignment with 21St Century Skills among Private Junior High Schools in Olongapo City, Zambales

This study examined the alignment of Social Studies instruction with 21st-century skills and the Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) of teachers in private junior high schools in Olongapo City, Zambales. Using a quantitative-descriptive design, data were gathered from 201 Grade 8 students and 30 Social Studies teachers across eight private schools through validated survey instruments. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests, including the Shapiro-Wilk Test, Mann-Whitney U Test, Kruskal-Wallis H Test, and Dunn’s post hoc analysis with Bonferroni adjustment, were utilized to analyze the data. Findings revealed that teachers demonstrated a very high level of Pedagogical Content Knowledge, particularly in pedagogical strategies and curriculum design. Students also perceived Social Studies instruction as aligned with 21st-century skills, especially in critical thinking and collaboration. However, relatively lower ratings were observed in creativity, leadership, and collaborative innovation. Significant differences emerged in selected student demographic variables, while most teacher demographic variables showed no significant differences in PCK. Despite these positive findings, the study acknowledges limitations related to self-reported measures, the absence of classroom observations, and the limited scope of private schools within one city. In response to the findings, the study proposed the SS21 Program: Bridging Pedagogy and Practice, a structured intervention framework designed to strengthen Social Studies pedagogy, enhance curriculum alignment, and cultivate critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and civic leadership among learners. The program includes targeted professional development sessions, collaborative learning initiatives, civic engagement activities, and assessment enhancement strategies for private junior high schools.

Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Social Studies teaching

1. Akiba, M., & Liang, G. (2016). Effects of teacher professional development on teaching practices: Evidence from large-scale surveys and meta-analysis. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 24(61), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2450 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bajarias, N., Ramos, R., De Guzman, R., Largo, P., Bairoy Galicia, D., & Cayogyog, A. O. (2024). Dynamics of curriculum alignment: Experiences of elementary school teachers in focus. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(7), 1830–1850. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.807145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High ability studies, 25(1), 53-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 28(1), 27–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Biliran, A. (2022). Students’ 21st century skills: Level of readiness for large-scale assessments. Cosmos: An International Journal of Art and Higher Education, 3(1), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.46360/cosmos.ahe.520231007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Biliran, J. (2021). Critical thinking and problem-solving skills of Filipino pupils: A large-scale evaluation. Philippine Journal of Educational Measurement, 12(1), 33–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Borko, H., Carlson, J., & Berry, A. (2022). Professional learning communities and teacher pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Brandmo, C., & Gamlem, S. M. (2025). Students’ perceptions and outcomes of teacher feedback: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1572950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2022). Pedagogical content knowledge for civic literacy in Social Studies classrooms. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(4), 389–402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chen, Y., & Park, S. (2022). Inquiry-based performance tasks and reflective assessment in Social Studies classrooms. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3), 311–328. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Crisolo, M., Dizon, R., & Santos, P. (2021). Social studies as a foundation for civic literacy and global identity among Zambales students. Philippine Social Science Review, 73(1), 89–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Crisolo, O. R., Camposano, S., & Rogayan, D. V., Jr. (2021). Relevance of Social Studies in the 21st-century society: Students’ perspectives. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 2(1), Article 101457. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.2021169729 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Crisolo, O. R., Camposano, S., & Rogayan, D. V., Jr. (2021). Relevance of Social Studies in the 21st-century society: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Education and Human Resources, 2(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1234/jehr.v2i1.2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2023). Pedagogical content knowledge and student engagement in European secondary schools. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2021). Effective teaching strategies for 21st-century learning. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. De Jesus, M. A., & Lacap, J. P. (2022). Pedagogical content knowledge of Social Studies teachers in public secondary schools: Basis for professional development. Philippine Social Science Journal, 5(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v5i2.408 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Dede, C. (2014). The role of digital technologies in collaborative learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782614 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Department of Education (2016). Policy guidelines on daily lesson preparation for the K to 12 basic education program (DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016). Department of Education. Retrrieved September 25, 2025 from https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Department of Education (DepEd). (2013). K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum. Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Department of Education (DepEd). (2015). DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015: Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Department of Education (DepEd). (2017). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017: Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Department of Education, Region III. (2022). Region III guidelines on character development and values education implementation. DepEd Region III. Retrieved October 2, 2025 from https://region3.deped.gov.ph/deped-region-iii-strengthens-character-development-through-guidelines-for-esp-gmrc-and-values-education-implementation-in-public-schools/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Department of Education. (2022). Shaping papers and curriculum guides for the K to 12 curriculum enhancement. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved September 27, 2025 from https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. DepEd Region III. (2022). Regional report on civic literacy and global awareness. Department of Education Region III. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Dunn, O. J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Espinosa, A. A. (2024). Integrating international large-scale assessment (ILSA) competencies into teacher education programs: A Philippine framework. Journal of Teacher Education and Practice, 6(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v18i2.8898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Espinosa, R. (2024). Assessment design skills of Social Studies teachers in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Educational Assessment, 12(1), 33–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Frydenberg, E., Ainley, M., & Russell, V. (2021). Teaching for 21st-century competencies: Developing students’ higher-order thinking in practice. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 12(2), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Gaitán-Aguilar, A. (2024). Civic and citizenship education in global contexts: Findings from ICCS 2022. International Journal of Civic Education, 5(1), 33–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Gaitán-Aguilar, L. (2024). A review of research on global citizenship in higher education: conceptualizations and empirical directions. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. García, E., & Weiss, E. (2019). The role of early career supports, continuous professional development, and learning communities in the teacher shortage. Economic Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Garcia, S. S., Rogayan, D. V., & Gagasa, K. L. M. (2021). Stakeholders’ awareness and acceptability of university’s vision and mission, and teacher education program goals and objectives in a state institution in Central Luzon, Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(1), 17-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Gaudicos, A. G. P., Kilag, O. K. T., Dayola, Y. M., Wagas, H. B., & Uy, F. T. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum: Bridging global competencies and Filipino values in Philippine education. University of the Visayas Research Journal, 15(1), 33–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2020). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (13th ed.). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2018.1.2.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Gillies, R. M. (2019). Promoting student leadership in cooperative learning groups. Educational Studies, 45(5), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1557741 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Grigaliuniene, M., Rutkiene, A., & Lehtinen, E. (2025). How Lithuanian mathematics teachers interpret student thinking at the different career stages. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Grigaliūnienė, V. (2024). Teacher training and content knowledge gaps in Social Studies education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2024.2056789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Harris, D., Jones, M., & Brown, T. (2021). Meta-analysis of teacher professional development interventions. Educational Research Review, 34, 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100418 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Henricksen, D., Mishra, P., & Mehta, R. (2020). Creativity as a global competency: An international perspective. Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 10–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Howe, C., Hennessy, S., & Mercer, N. (2019). Classroom dialogue and student attainment. The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education, 182–195. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441677-16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. IEA. (2023). International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS) 2022: Compass Briefs in Education, Issue 28. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Jacobs, G. M., Delante, N., & Lawson, L. (2017). Collaboration can promote students’ creativity. ED Journal of Education Research, 5(1), 23–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418823146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Kim, J., & Choi, H. (2023). Pedagogical content knowledge and inquiry-based teaching in Social Studies classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2056789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Laluna, M. D., & Dela Cruz, J. V. (2021). The impact of project-based learning in teaching Social Studies towards developing the students’ critical thinking skills in the new normal. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 2(6), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Lee, P., & Shemwell, J. (2021). Historical interpretation and disciplinary reasoning in Social Studies classrooms. Journal of Social Studies Research, 45(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.11.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Lim, C., Tan, J., & Rahman, H. (2023). Project-based learning and civic competencies in Asian classrooms. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09789-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Lopez Wui, M. G., Claudio, J. S. R., Reyes, C. R., & Reyes-Carbaja, R. T. M. (2019). Civic education in the Philippines: Confronting the challenges of the present times. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Southeast Asia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Maligalig, C. D. (2023). Teachers’ PCK in Social Studies: A basis for enhancing curriculum alignment in secondary schools. The Normal Lights, 17(1), 56–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Manigbas, J. I. (2024). Teachers’ competency in content knowledge and pedagogy in Philippine Social Studies classrooms. Philippine Journal of Teacher Education, 29(1), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Manigbas, J. I. I. (2024). Teachers’ competency in content knowledge and pedagogy in Buhi South District, Philippines. International Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.56442/ieti.v2i1.365 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Manila Bulletin. (2023, January 30). DepEd aligns K to 12 curriculum with Philippine Qualifications Framework. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Bagnoli, C. (2020). Global citizenship education and civic identity development. International Journal of Educational Development, 74, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, M. Q. (2024). Pedagogical content knowledge alignment in private secondary schools in Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Education Research, 42(1), 77–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Nilsson, P., & Karlsson, M. (2021). Assessment literacy as a dynamic element in teacher practice. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(3), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1719425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. OECD. (2019). OECD learning compass 2030: A series of concept notes. OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. Retrived September 27, 2025 from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. OECD. (2020). What students learn matters: Towards a 21st century curriculum. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d86d4d9a-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. OECD. (2021). Curriculum alignment and assessment frameworks in education. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. OECD. (2021). Teachers’ professional learning for the digital transition. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3329fae9-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Ofsted. (2021). Research review series: Social Studies and humanities. Ofsted UK. https://www.gov.uk/ofsted [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Olongapo City Planning Office. (2024). Olongapo City comprehensive development plan 2024–2028. Olongapo City Government. Retrieved October 2, 2025 from https://olongapocity.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Olongapo-City-Comprehensive-Development-Plan.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Oluwagbohunmi, M. F., & Alonge, H. O. (2023). Pedagogical content knowledge and 21st-century skills: Evidence from global classrooms. International Journal of Social Studies Education, 5(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Oluwagbohunmi, M. F., & Alonge, R. A. (2023). 21st century skills and its applicability to social studies. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 41(3), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v41i3896 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Out-of-Field Teaching Study. (2025). Teacher supply and out-of-field teaching in Philippine secondary schools. Department of Education Policy Research Division. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Owusu, F. (2025). Exploring critical thinking and problem-solving assessment methods in Social Studies: A systematic review. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 13(4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.13n.4p.83 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Pating, J., Dela Cruz, M., & Ramos, A. (2023). Modular distance learning challenges in Indigenous communities: Pedagogical content knowledge gaps. Philippine Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 22–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Pating, R., Penales, J., & Fernandez, M. (2023). Phenomenologizing the experiences of Social Studies teachers in modular distance learning among Indigenous Peoples (IP) students. Asian Society of Teachers for Research Journal, 15(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.56278/asten.v7i.2166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Punch, K. F., & Oancea, A. (2021). Introduction to research methods in education (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Punch, K., & Oancea, A. (2021). Introduction to research methods in education (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003141402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Rogayan, D. V. Jr. (2022). Pedagogical content knowledge and instructional competence of secondary teachers in the new normal: Basis for professional development. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(2), 34–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Rogayan, D. V., Jr., & Dela Cruz, R. M. (2021). Social studies instruction and 21st-century skills integration: Evidence from Philippine classrooms. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 9(4), 55–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Rogayan, D. V., Jr., Dela Cruz, R. M., & Roxas, R. E. (2022). Social studies curriculum alignment and student learning needs: Evidence from Central Luzon. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 10(3), 22–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Rogayan, D. V., Jr., Gallardo, C. B., Lacaste, J. T., & Roque, D. J. A. (2022). 21st-century skills of Social Studies students: Basis for a proposed training program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(2), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.02.08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Scoular, C. (2020). Novice teachers and instructional technology: Opportunities and challenges in 21st-century education. Computers & Education, 150, 103857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Seeram, E. (2019). An overview of research designs relevant to nursing and healthcare. Radiologic Technology, 90(5), 482–486. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.2020191352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Serafico-Reyes, N. M., & Hasan, H. (2019). Araling Panlipunan in the Philippine Makabayan Learning Area: Problems and prospects in articulating Social Studies as a discipline. Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Education Symposium (AES 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/AES-18.2019.33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Shubina, I., & Kulakli, A. (2020). Critical thinking, creativity and gender differences for knowledge generation in education. Infonomics Society Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 112–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Taguma, M., & Frid, A. (2024). Curriculum frameworks and visualisations beyond national frameworks: Alignment with the OECD Learning Compass 2030. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2a4bdce6-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Taguma, M., & Frid, C. (2024). 21st-century skills and curriculum alignment: International perspectives. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited: An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences, 21(1), 19–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. UNESCO. (2024). 2024 Gender Report: Global Education Monitoring Report. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. van der Zanden, P. J. A. C., Denessen, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Meijer, P. C. (2020). Domains and predictors of first-year student success: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 31, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Van der Zanden, P. J. A. C., et al. (2020). Fostering critical thinking skills in secondary education: Teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 62(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2020.1846313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Van Der Zanden, P. J., Denessen, E., Cillessen, A. H., & Meijer, P. C. (2020). Fostering critical thinking skills in secondary education to prepare students for university: teacher perceptions and practices. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 25(4), 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2020.1846313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Varilla, F. G., Lazare, N. M., & Gregorious, M. S. (2024). A concise inquiry of college teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) during the post-pandemic. Quezon City University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Vázquez-Bernal, B., Mellado, V., & Jiménez-Pérez, R. (2022). Pedagogical content knowledge development through reflective practice and collaboration. Research in Science Education, 52(3), 765–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09936-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Villegas, M. A., & Lucas, R. J. (2020). Teacher professional learning and curriculum responsiveness in Philippine education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(3), 345–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & ten Brummelhuis, A. (2022). Misalignment in teaching critical thinking and teamwork: Pedagogical content knowledge gaps. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(5), 623–640. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Wibowo, A. (2022). Longitudinal study of professional development and curriculum design in Social Studies education. Journal of Educational Research, 115(4), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2022.2056789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Wibowo, D. (2020). The role of school culture in teacher professional development for peace education: The case of three schools in post-conflict Aceh, Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Otago). https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2021.2015573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Influence of Korean Drama to Cultural Identity of Students in One Private School
• Children’s Vulnerability in Coastal Slums during Cyclone: A Case Study of Puri Municipality Area
• Mitigating Youth Restiveness Through Social Studies Education: Implications for Institutional Stability, Civic Responsibility, and Student Empowerment in Nigeria
• Students’ Awareness of Sexual Harassment Forms at Campus II, University of Labor and Social Affairs
• Influence of Social Studies Curriculum Content on Youth Restiveness and Civic Responsibility Among Secondary School Students in Nigeria