Peer Editing and Improved Classroom Relationships in an ESL Writing Lesson

Writing lessons in East African ESL contexts are characterized by among other things, teacher-centeredness and one-way communication from the teacher to the students resulting in gaps in classroom relationships. Similarly, student-student relationships also exhibit detachment arising from lack of trust in the linguistic ability of peers, competition among students and lack of interactional skills. However, research and literature show a link between classroom relations and a student's academic achievements. This paper is a report of findings of a study which I conducted in a Form three class in a rural secondary school in Western Kenya, as part of my MEd dissertation that focused on improving students' compositions using peer editing. As I introduced peer editing, I was also able to observe the classroom relationships. Data for the study was gathered mainly using observation and interviews. Analysis of the findings revealed improvement in student-student and, student-teacher classroom relationships that led to increased interest in writing tasks. The findings suggest that peer editing, which introduces collaboration in a writing task, could be a means of bridging the gap among students and in student- teacher relationships. (188 words)

Peer Editing, Classroom Relationships, Collaboration

1. Archibald, A. (2001). Targeting L2 writing proficiencies: Instruction and Areas of change in Students' Writing over Time. International Journal of English Studies. 1(2), 153-174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Coleman, A. J., & Klapper, J. (2005). (Eds.). Effective Learning and Teaching in Modern Language. London: Routledge [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Coombs, B. (1995). Successful teaching: A practical handbook. Oxford: Heinemann Educational Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ferguson-Patrick, K. (2007). Writers Develop Skills Through Collaboration: An Action Research Approach. Educational Action Research, 15(2), p.159-180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ferris, D., & Robert, B. (2000). Error Feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of second language writing. 10(3), p.161-184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Glasgow, A. N., & Hicks, D. C. (2003). What successful teachers do: 91 research based classroom strategies for new and veteran teachers. California: Thousand Oaks [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2008). Looking in classrooms (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Guo-Chen, J., & Ming-Li, W. (2008). Study of the learner-centered interactive teaching model in the EFL classroom. 5(50). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2009). Feedback in second language writing: Context and Issues. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 8(1), p.75-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Keh, L. C. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT journal. 44(4), p.294-304. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kroll, B. (1991). Teaching Writing in an ESl Context. In Murci-Celce, M (Ed.) (2nd ed.) Teaching English as a Second Language or Foreign Language, p 245-276. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mujidi, J. (2008). Writing. In Groenwegen, T. (Ed.). Benchmarks for English language Education Practitioners. Nairobi: Phoenix Publishers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rivers, W. M. (1987). Interaction as the key to teaching language for communication. In Rivers W. M. (Eds). In interactive language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Russo, M. G. (1987). Writing: an interactive experience. In Rivers, W. M. (Ed.). Interactive language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Singer, J. A. (2003). Teaching to learn, learning to teach: A handbook for secondary school teachers. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the Merits of Pairwork on a Text Editing Task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), p143-159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Villamil, S. O., & De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 491-514. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A Comprehensive study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of second language learning. 15(3), 179-200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study