Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Accounting Education in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly reshaped instructional practices in accounting education within higher education institutions. This study conducts a systematic literature review to synthesize current empirical research and address a notable gap in the integrated understanding of instructional practices and perceived outcomes. Guided by the PRISMA 2020 framework, the primary objectives are to identify major research themes and examine how AI is applied, including the associated learning outcomes, benefits, and challenges reported in the literature.
The methodology involved a systematic search of three electronic databases, Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC, retrieving peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2021 and 2025. A total of 22 articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using a thematic synthesis approach. Results indicate that research is predominantly concentrated on "challenges, risks, and ethical concerns" (59.09%), "adoption and acceptance of AI" (54.55%), and "perceived benefits" (45.45%). Geographically, research is heavily focused on Asian emerging economies, particularly Indonesia and Malaysia, while methodologically, quantitative surveys utilizing structural equation modelling (SEM) prevail over qualitative or experimental designs. Key findings suggest that while AI enhances learning efficiency and higher order skills such as critical thinking, adoption is primarily driven by perceived usefulness and users’ digital competencies. Conversely, barriers such as academic integrity, overreliance, and data privacy remain significant concerns shaping implementation.
This review concludes that the current research landscape is primarily technology-adoption oriented, with limited emphasis on pedagogical transformation or learning theory. Future research should move beyond feasibility studies to develop systematic pedagogical frameworks and evaluate the long-term impact of AI on accounting competencies and professional readiness.

Artificial intelligence; Accounting education; Higher education; Systematic literature review.

1. Al-Okaily, M. (2025). ChatGPT as an educational resource for accounting students: expanding the classical TAM model. EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 30(12), 16671–16685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13391-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bui, H. Q., Phan, Q. T. B., & Nguyen, H. T. (2025). AI adoption: a new perspective from accounting students in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 32(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-06-2024-0300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Damerji, H., & Salimi, A. (2021). Mediating effect of use perceptions on technology readiness and adoption of artificial intelligence in accounting. ACCOUNTING EDUCATION, 30(2), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2021.1872035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dosumu, O., Porumb, V. A., Stafford, A., & Zimmer, A. (2025). In the wake of ChatGPT: early reflections on marking open-book online accounting assessments. ACCOUNTING EDUCATION. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2025.2487487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fachrurrozie, F., Nurkhin, A., Santoso, J. T. B., Mukhibad, H., & Wolor, C. W. (2025). Exploring the use of artificial intelligence in Indonesian accounting classes. COGENT EDUCATION, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2448053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gaviria-Rodríguez, D. Y., Valencia-Arias, A., Arango-Arango, J. G., Raunelli Sander, J. M., Verde Flores, L., & Valencia, J. (2025). Intention to use AI in accounting education: an analysis from the TAM and TPB perspectives. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1637857 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Grabinska, B., Andrzejewski, M., & Grabinski, K. (2021). The students' and graduates' perception of the potential usefulness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the academic curricula of Finance and Accounting Courses. E-MENTOR(5), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.15219/em92.1544 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Han, M., Mustafa, H., & Kharuddin, S. (2025). AI adoption in accounting education: A UTAUT-based analysis of mediating and moderating mechanisms. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202532831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ismail, K., & Krishnanraw, J. (2025). Behavioral Intention to Use Artificial Intelligence (AI) Among Accounting Students: Evaluating the Effect of Job Relevance. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 27(3), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.110620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Krishnanraw, J., & Ismail, K. (2025). Behavioural Intention to use Artificial Intelligenc(AI) among Accounting Students: Evaluating the Effect of Technology Readiness. Management and Accounting Review, 24(1), 465–493. https://doi.org/10.24191/MAR.V24i01-17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kurniawan, C., & Putri Hendratno, S. P. (2025). Analyzing the Impact of AI Text Generators on Learning Styles, Technological Dependency, and Critical Thinking among Accounting Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(11), 2465–2475. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.11.2442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Latifah, L., Setiyani, R., Arief, S., & Susilowati, N. (2023). The Role of Personal Values in Forming the AI Ethics of Prospective Accountants. Ethics in Progress, 14(2), 90–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2023.2.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Maruszewska, E. W., Ziemba, E. W., Grabara, D., & Renik, K. (2024). The determinants of ChatGPT usage among accounting students: the role of habit, social influence, and facilitating conditions. ZESZYTY TEORETYCZNE RACHUNKOWOSCI, 48(3), 215–232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.7264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Meesook, K., Imjai, N., Usman, B., Vongchavalitkul, B., & Aujirapongpan, S. (2025). The influence of AI literacy on risk management skills and the roles of diagnostic capabilities and prognostic capabilities: Empirical insight from Thai gen Z accounting students. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Musyaffi, A. M., Adha, M. A., Mukhibad, H., & Oli, M. C. (2024). Improving students' openness to artificial intelligence through risk awareness and digital literacy: Evidence form a developing country. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Musyaffi, A. M., Baxtishodovich, B. S., Afriadi, B., Hafeez, M., Adha, M. A., & Wibowo, S. N. (2024). New Challenges of Learning Accounting With Artificial Intelligence: The Role of Innovation and Trust in Technology. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 183–195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nusa, I. B. S., Rachmanto, A., & Alhilo, M. H. H. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Technologies on the Profession of Accounting Educators. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 18(5 Special Issue), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v18i5.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Promma, W., Imjai, N., Usman, B., & Aujirapongpan, S. (2025). The influence of AI literacy on complex problem-solving skills through systematic thinking skills and intuition thinking skills: An empirical study in Thai gen Z accounting students. COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sundkvist, C. H., & Kulset, E. M. (2024). Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT–The student perspective. Journal of Accounting Education, 69, 100932. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC medical research methodology, 8(1), 45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Venter, J., Coetzee, S. A., & Schmulian, A. (2025). Exploring the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the delivery of effective feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(4), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2415649 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Voshaar, J., Wecks, J. O., Plate, B. J., & Zimmermann, J. (2025). Tackling Professorial Expert Bias: The Role of ChatGPT in Simplifying Financial Accounting Exam Texts. ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION, 40(1), 93–123. https://doi.org/10.2308/ISSUES-2023-091 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zhou, A., & Luo, Y. (2025). Exploring the impact of generative AI on student learning in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100982 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study