Perceptions of University Students on Social Interactions between Local and International Students on Campus: A Case Study of the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)

Social interaction between local and international students is essential for fostering cross-cultural understanding, reducing stereotypes, and enhancing academic and personal development in diverse university environments. This study examines university students’ perceptions of social interactions between local and international students at the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), where local students constitute approximately 70% and international students from over 100 countries make up 30%. Using a qualitative research design with semi-structured in-depth interviews, data were collected from 12 students (6 local and 6 international) at the Gombak campus. The findings reveal generally positive perceptions of the potential benefits of social interaction, yet actual engagement remains limited. Major barriers identified include language differences, cultural disparities, pre-existing social networks, lack of interaction activities, and insufficient support systems, which are exacerbated by the shift to hybrid and online learning post-COVID-19. Students expressed the need for structured support mechanisms such as buddy programs, intercultural workshops, inclusive campus events, and language support services. The study proposes a framework of effective strategies grounded in Social Constructivism Theory to enhance meaningful interactions. These insights offer practical recommendations for IIUM and similar Malaysian universities to promote integration, intercultural competence, and a more inclusive campus environment.

Social interaction, local students, international students, intercultural communication, barriers to integration, Malaysia, higher education

1. Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of social sciences, literature and languages, 1(1), 9-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aydın, O. T. (2020). Social Interaction Between Students: Local and International Students' Experiences at a Turkish University. Journal of International Students, 10(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Azmat, M., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Lack of social interaction in online classes during COVID-19. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 13(2), 185-196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baber, H. (2022), "Social interaction and effectiveness of the online learning – A moderating role of maintaining social distance during the pandemic COVID-19", Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(1),159-171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brown, L., & Wilson, H. (2018). Exploring Social Integration of International Students: A Qualitative Study. Higher Education, 76(4), 701-719. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (1998). Intercultural Communication Competence: A Synthesis. Communication Yearbook, 21, 335-370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cornwell EY, Waite L. J.(2009). Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. J Health Soc Behav. 50(1),31-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Deepa, V., Baber, H., Shukla, B., Sujatha, R., & Khan, D. (2023). Does lack of social interaction act as a barrier to effectiveness in work from home? COVID-19 and gender. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 10(1), 94-111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Garcia, M., & Nguyen, T. (2017). Barriers to Social Interaction Between Local and International Students: A Case Study of a UK University. Studies in Higher Education, 42(2), 261-278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. García-Ros, R., Pérez-González, F., Cavas-Martínez, F., & Tomás, J. M. (2018). Social interaction learning strategies, motivation, first-year students’ experiences and permanence in university studies. Educational Psychology, 38(4), 451-469. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hashim, H. A. (2012). Perceived barriers to recreation sport participation in university students: A comparison between international and local students in the United States. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 20(1), 197-203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Holliday, A., Hyde, M., & Kullman, J. (2021). Intercultural communication: An advanced resource book for students. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hurst, B., Wallace, R. R., & Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ilias, A., Baidi, N., Ghani, E. K., & Razali, F. M. (2020). Issues on the use of online learning: An exploratory study among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5092-5105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ilham, M. (2023). Student Social Interaction in Online Learning. Indonesian Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 42-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Irby, T. L., Wynn, J. T., & Strong, R. (2012). A descriptive evaluation of agricultural education eLearning courses: Students' perspectives. NACTA Journal, 56(3), 70-76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Järvinen, M., & Mik-Meyer, N. (Eds.). (2020). Qualitative analysis: Eight approaches for the social sciences. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical teacher, 42(8), 846-854 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kim, S., & Jones, L. (2021). Supporting Social Interaction Between Local and International Students: A Comparative Study of Different University Programs. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 85, 102-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 33267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Leal Filho, W., Wall, T., Rayman-Bacchus, L., Mifsud, M., Pritchard, D. J., Lovren, V. O., ... & Balogun, A. L. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 and social isolation on academic staff and students at universities: a cross-sectional study. BMC public health, 21(1), 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rathakrishnan, B., Bikar Singh, S. S., Kamaluddin, M. R., Ghazali, M. F., Yahaya, A., Mohamed, N. H., & Krishnan, A. R. (2021). Homesickness and socio-cultural adaptation towards perceived stress among international students of a public university in Sabah: An exploration study for social sustainability. Sustainability, 13(9), 4924. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Saurino, D. R., Saurino, P., & Clemente, R. (2009). Social Interaction Strategies and Techniques for Today's Classrooms. Journal on School Educational Technology, 4(4), 24-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Smith, J., Johnson, A., & Lee, K. (2020). Perceptions and Experiences of Social Interaction Among Local and International Students in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Review. Journal of International Students, 10(3), 789-810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Smith, R. A., & Khawaja, N. G. (2011). A review of the acculturation experiences of international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(6), 699-713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tavares, V. (2021). Feeling excluded: international students experience equity, diversity and inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Thompson, R., Hernandez, M., & Chen, S. (2019). Promoting Social Interaction Between Local and International Students: Perspectives from Student Services Professionals. Journal of International Students, 9(4), 1135-1157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Topping, K. J. (2023). Advantages and Disadvantages of Online and Face-to-Face Peer Learning in Higher Education: A Review. Education Sciences, 13(4), 326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Umar, N., Atan, N. A., & Majid, U. M. A. (2023). Learning activities based on social constructivism theory to promote social interaction and student’s performance (EPSISM). In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2569, No. 1). AIP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Wang, J., Xie, K., Liu, Q., Long, T., & Lu, G. (2023). Examining the effect of seat location on students’ real-time social interactions in a smart classroom using experience sampling method. Journal of Computers in Education, 10(2), 217-235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zajda, J. (2023). Social Constructivism to Improve Students’ Motivation. In Globalisation and Dominant Models of Motivation Theories in Education (pp. 63-79). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study