Phonemic and Lexical Use in Igbo–English Bilingual Aphasics

Authors

Chinelo Vivian Uti

Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka (Nigeria)

Hannah Ayibakuro Suobite

Department of Modern Languages, Rivers State University, Nkpolu-Oroworukwo, Port Harcourt (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100199

Subject Category: Linguistics

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 2526-2540

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-10

Accepted: 2026-01-17

Published: 2026-01-30

Abstract

This study investigates phonological and lexical impairments in the speech of Igbo/English bilingual aphasics, with a focus on how aphasia affects the realization of phonemes and the use of lexical items across the two languages. Aphasia is an acquired language disorder resulting from brain damage, most commonly caused by stroke, and it may impair language production and comprehension at various linguistic levels. Given Nigeria’s multilingual context and the widespread use of English alongside indigenous languages such as Igbo, bilingual aphasia presents a complex linguistic phenomenon that requires systematic investigation. The study adopts a descriptive research design and is grounded in the theoretical frameworks of structuralism and socio-communicative theory. Data were collected from three Igbo/English bilingual aphasic participants receiving medical care at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. Speech samples were elicited through spontaneous conversation, question-and-answer sessions, and object/picture naming tasks. Phonetic transcription using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) was employed for detailed phonological analysis, while lexical performance was assessed through word retrieval tasks in both languages. Findings reveal marked phonological impairments characterized by sound substitutions, deletions, and distortions in both Igbo and English. Notably, phonemes that are structurally complex or absent in one language were more vulnerable to impairment. Lexical analysis shows significant word-finding difficulties in both languages, with greater impairment observed in English (L2) than in Igbo (L1). The aphasics demonstrated slower lexical retrieval, use of inappropriate lexical items, and circumlocution, especially in L2. Overall, the study establishes that while both languages are affected by aphasia, the first language exhibits relative resilience. These findings have important implications for bilingual aphasia assessment and rehabilitation in multilingual contexts.

Keywords

Aphasia, Bilingualism, Phonological Impairment, Lexical Access, Igbo-English Language Use

Downloads

References

1. Akínmúrelé, A.T., 2019. Morphosyntactic features of selected bilingual aphasic and autistic speeches in southwestern Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Umman, K.Z., 2015. Ferdinand De Saussure: Structuralism and his role in modern linguistics. Lisanudhad: Jurnal Bahasa, Pembelajaran, Dan Sastra Arab, 2(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baghirova, S., 2018. An Investigation of Bilingualism. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Benson, D.F. and Ardila, A., 1996. Aphasia: A clinical perspective. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bialystok, E. and Hakuta, K., 1999. Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, 161, p.181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Binder, J.R., 2017. Current controversies on Wernicke’s area and its role in language. Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 17(8), p.58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bullier, B., Cassoudesalle, H., Villain, M., Cogné, M., Mollo, C., De Gabory, I., Dehail, P., Joseph, P.A., Sibon, I. and Glize, B., 2020. New factors that affect quality of life in patients with aphasia. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 63(1), pp.33-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bybee, J., 2003. Phonology and language use (Vol. 94). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Calabria, M., Costa, A., Green, D.W. and Abutalebi, J., 2018. Neural basis of bilingual language control. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1426(1), pp.221-235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Caplan, L.R., Simon, R.P. and Hassani, S., 2023. Cerebrovascular disease—stroke. In Neurobiology of brain disorders (pp. 457-476). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Caramazza, A. and Hillis, A.E., 1990. Where do semantic errors come from?. Cortex, 26(1), pp.95-122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chauhan, N.B., 2014. Chronic neurodegenerative consequences of traumatic brain injury. Restorative neurology and neuroscience, 32(2), pp.337-365. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Clark, D.G. and Cummings, J.L., 2003. Aphasia. In Neurological disorders (pp. 265-275). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Clough, S. and Gordon, J.K., 2020. Fluent or nonfluent? Part A. Underlying contributors to categorical classifications of fluency in aphasia. Aphasiology, 34(5), pp.515-539. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Code, C., 2021. Aphasia. The handbook of language and speech disorders, pp.286-309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Coppens, P., 2016. Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Damasio, A.R. and Damasio, H., 2000. Aphasia and the neural basis of language. Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology, pp.294-315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Denes, G., Semenza, C. and Caldognetto, E.M., 2020. Phonological disorders in aphasia. In Handbook of clinical and experimental neuropsychology (pp. 195-214). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Derakhshan, A. and Karimi, E., 2015. The interference of first language and second language acquisition. Theory and Practice in language studies, 5(10), pp.2112-2117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Díaz Gutiérrez, M., 2024. Meaning in the brain: Exploring Insights from Language Impairment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Døli, H., Andersen Helland, W., Helland, T. and Specht, K., 2021. Associations between lesion size, lesion location and aphasia in acute stroke. Aphasiology, 35(6), pp.745-763. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Elleuch, D., 2024. Exploring Pragmatic Deficits in Broca's Aphasia Through Relevance Theory. New Advances in Brain & Critical Care, 5(1), pp.01-05. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Filipska-Blejder, K., Zielińska, J., Zieliński, M., Wiśniewski, A. and Ślusarz, R., 2023. How does aphasia affect quality of life? Preliminary reports. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(24), p.7687. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Foote, R., 2010. Age of acquisition and proficiency as factors in language production: Agreement in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 13(2), pp.99-118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Fridriksson, J., Fillmore, P., Guo, D. and Rorden, C., 2015. Chronic Broca's aphasia is caused by damage to Broca's and Wernicke's areas. Cerebral Cortex, 25(12), pp.4689-4696. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Gollan, T.H. and Kroll, J.F., 2015. Bilingual lexical access. In Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology (pp. 321-345). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Goral, M. and Hejazi, Z., 2021. Aphasia in multilingual patients. Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 21(11), p.60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hambly, H., Wren, Y., McLeod, S. and Roulstone, S., 2013. The influence of bilingualism on speech production: A systematic review. International journal of language & communication disorders, 48(1), pp.1-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hameau, S., Dmowski, U. and Nickels, L., 2023. Factors affecting cross-language activation and language mixing in bilingual aphasia: A case study. Aphasiology, 37(8), pp.1149-1172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hasan, F., Kalra, N., Siddique, N.A., Kumar, P. and Kumar, V., 2024. Broca's aphasia: A detailed review of its features, origins, diagnosis, and management. IJCS, 12(5), pp.08-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hegde, M.N., 2022. A coursebook on aphasia and other neurogenic language disorders. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Hodson, B.W. and Paden, E.P., 1981. Phonological processes which characterize unintelligible and intelligible speech in early childhood. Journal of speech and Hearing Disorders, 46(4), pp.369-373. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Hope, T.M., Parker Jones, Ō., Grogan, A., Crinion, J., Rae, J., Ruffle, L., Leff, A.P., Seghier, M.L., Price, C.J. and Green, D.W., 2015. Comparing language outcomes in monolingual and bilingual stroke patients. Brain, 138(4), pp.1070-1083. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Hughes, C. and Leekam, S., 2004. What are the links between theory of mind and social relations? Review, reflections and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Social development, 13(4), pp.590-619. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kuzmina, E., Goral, M., Norvik, M. and Weekes, B.S., 2019. What influences language impairment in bilingual aphasia? A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in psychology, 10, p.445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Lahiri, D., Ardila, A., Dubey, S., Mukherjee, A., Chatterjee, K. and Ray, B.K., 2021. Effect of bilingualism on aphasia recovery. Aphasiology, 35(8), pp.1103-1124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Lundholm Fors, K., 2015. Production and perception of pauses in speech. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. McIntyre, L.J., Hellsten, L.A.M., Bidonde, J., Boden, C. and Doi, C., 2017. Receptive and expressive English language assessments used for young children: a scoping review protocol. Systematic reviews, 6(1), p.70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mesulam, M.M., Thompson, C.K., Weintraub, S. and Rogalski, E.J., 2015. The Wernicke conundrum and the anatomy of language comprehension in primary progressive aphasia. Brain, 138(8), pp.2423-2437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Montrul, S., 2005. Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: Exploring some differences and similarities. Second language research, 21(3), pp.199-249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Mooijman, S., Schoonen, R., Goral, M., Roelofs, A. and Ruiter, M.B., 2025. Why do bilingual speakers with aphasia alternate between languages? A study into their experiences and mixing patterns. Aphasiology, pp.1-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Mrkonjić, Z., Begić, L. and Smajlović, S., 2019. The Understanding of Reversible Sentences in Persons With Aphasia. Research in Education and Rehabilitation, 2(2), pp.56-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Müller, H.M., 2025. Acquired Language Impairments Due to Brain Damage. In Introduction to Neurolinguistics (pp. 93-107). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ndiribe, M.O. and Aboh, S.C., 2022. Multilingualism and marginalisation: A Nigeria diversity approach. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(1), pp.1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Neumann, Y., Walters, J. and Altman, C., 2017. Codeswitching and discourse markers in the narratives of a bilingual speaker with aphasia. Aphasiology, 31(2), pp.221-240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Newcombe, M.B., 2024. Speech prosody in people with non-fluent aphasia: A descriptive study of between and within utterance pause (Master's thesis, Brigham Young University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Pummill, K.L., 2019. Comprehension and Phonemic Mismatch in Disordered Speech. Bowling Green State University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Rashed Chitgar, E., Saadat, P., Maddahiyan, M., Amirifar, P., Hojjati, S.M.M. and Dehghan, M., 2022. Correlation between Brain Lesion Site and Fluent/Non-Fluent Aphasia. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 32(215), pp.157-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Ryan, A., Gibbon, F.E. and O’shea, A., 2016. Expressive and receptive language skills in preschool children from a socially disadvantaged area. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(1), pp.41-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Sabourin, L. and Stowe, L.A., 2008. Second language processing: When are first and second languages processed similarly?. Second Language Research, 24(3), pp.397-430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Schwartz, R.G., 2017. Specific language impairment. In Handbook of child language disorders (pp. 3-51). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Shipley, K.G. and McAfee, J.G., 2023. Assessment in speech-language pathology: A resource manual. Plural Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Sinanović, O., Mrkonjić, Z., Zukić, S., Vidović, M. and Imamović, K., 2011. Post-stroke language disorders. Acta Clin Croat, 50(1), pp.79-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Sunday, D., 2013. Language policy: Nigeria and the role of English language in the 21st century. European Scientific Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Udoh, I. and Emmanuel, I., 2020. Nigerian languages and identity crises. Language and Semiotic Studies, 6(3), pp.96-111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Venkat, P., Chopp, M. and Chen, J., 2017. Blood–brain barrier disruption, vascular impairment, and ischemia/reperfusion damage in diabetic stroke. Journal of the American Heart Association, 6(6), p.e005819. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Wei, L., 2020. Dimensions of bilingualism. In The bilingualism reader (pp. 3-22). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles