Policy Coordination in Combating Human Trafficking: A Systematic Review of Institutional Frameworks and Multi-Agency Collaboration
Authors
Faculty of Administrative Science & Policy Studies, University Technology Mara (Malaysia)
Faculty of Administrative Science & Policy Studies, University Technology Mara (Malaysia)
Faculty of Administrative Science & Policy Studies, University Technology Mara (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100205
Subject Category: Political Science
Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 2553-2564
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-10
Accepted: 2025-11-20
Published: 2025-12-05
Abstract
Human trafficking remains one of the most pressing global challenges, violating fundamental human rights and undermining social, legal, and political systems worldwide. Despite the establishment of international instruments such as the Palermo Protocol, responses to trafficking continue to suffer from fragmented policy implementation, weak institutional capacity, and inconsistent collaboration among agencies. These gaps highlight the urgent need to examine how institutional frameworks and multi-agency collaborations can be more effectively aligned to combat trafficking. This study aims to analyse the research landscape on policy coordination in combating human trafficking, with particular emphasis on institutional frameworks and collaborative governance mechanisms. Using a systematic review approach supported by Scopus AI Analytics, the study employed a structured search strategy and advanced bibliometric tools to identify, categorize, and synthesize literature published up to September 2025. The analysis generated summaries, expanded summaries, concept maps, topic expert profiles, and emerging themes, offering a comprehensive overview of the field. The findings reveal consistent themes emphasizing the importance of international and national policy coordination, rising themes such as the role of healthcare professionals and collaborative governance in prevention, and novel themes including social rehabilitation, economic empowerment of survivors, and the prevention of organ trafficking. Prominent scholars were identified as shaping the discourse on cross-sector collaboration and systemic change. Theoretically, the study contributes to governance and human rights perspectives by situating trafficking within multidimensional frameworks, while practically, it underscores the importance of resource allocation, inter-agency trust, and survivor-centred interventions. Limitations include reliance on Scopus-indexed publications and abstract-based analysis, but these are offset by the study’s broad coverage and analytical depth. The review concludes that future research should expand empirical evaluations of collaborative practices and explore interdisciplinary approaches to address emerging challenges.
Keywords
Human Trafficking, Policy Coordination, Institutional Frameworks
Downloads
References
1. Bonsoms, A. (2025). Power, governance, and coordination in the prevention of violent extremism and terrorism: Towards multi-agency counterterrorism? European Security, 34(3), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2025.2449866 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bouché, V., Robichau, R. W., Tipton, T., Metcalf, M., & Clark, T. (2025). Human trafficking policy evolution: Analyzing punctuated diffusion across two decades. Journal of Human Trafficking. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2025.2529713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Castellano, R. (2023). Opportunities and obstacles: Consulting civil society organizations and human trafficking policy. Voluntas, 34(5), 1050–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00522-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Davy, D. (2016). Anti-human trafficking interventions: How do we know if they are working? American Journal of Evaluation, 37(4), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016641211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Farrell, A. (2014). Environmental and institutional influences on police agency responses to human trafficking. Police Quarterly, 17(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611113495050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Farrell, A., Owens, C., & McDevitt, J. (2014). New laws but few cases: Understanding the challenges to the investigation and prosecution of human trafficking cases. Crime, Law and Social Change, 61(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9442-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Fekry, M. A., Al Qatawneh, I. S., Barafi, J., Kandeel, M. E., & Haswa, M. (2023). International judicial and cross-border cooperation to combat human trafficking: Analysis of UAE legislation in accordance with global practice. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 21(2), 855–868. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2023-21.2.024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Foot, K. (2019). Multisector collaboration against human trafficking. In P. Cockbain & J. Brayley (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of human trafficking (pp. 659–672). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63058-8_41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ford, M., & Lyons, L. (2012). Counter-trafficking and migrant labour activism in Indonesia’s periphery. In M. Ford, L. Lyons, & W. van Schendel (Eds.), Labour migration and human trafficking in Southeast Asia: Critical perspectives (pp. 75–94). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203121535-11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Gallagher, A., & Holmes, P. (2008). Developing an effective criminal justice response to human trafficking: Lessons from the front line. International Criminal Justice Review, 18(3), 318–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567708320746 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Greenfield, V. A., Paoli, L., & Zoutendijk, A. (2016). The harms of human trafficking: Demonstrating the applicability and value of a new framework for systematic, empirical analysis. Global Crime, 17(2), 152–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2016.1161037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hounmenou, C., & Toepp, S. (2023). Exploring private investigation agencies’ experience of collaboration with law enforcement in investigations of human trafficking cases. Societies, 13(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13020044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Huff-Corzine, L., Sacra, S. A., Corzine, J., & Rados, R. (2017). Florida’s task force approach to combat human trafficking: An analysis of county-level data. Police Practice and Research, 18(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2017.1291567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Jones, T. (2023). Perceptions of the benefits and barriers to anti-human trafficking interagency collaboration: An exploratory factor analysis study. Societies, 13(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13020038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Jones, T. R., & Lutze, F. E. (2016). Anti-human trafficking interagency collaboration in the state of Michigan: An exploratory study. Journal of Human Trafficking, 2(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2015.1075342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Knight, L., & Kagotho, N. (2023). A scoping review of faith-based responses to human trafficking in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work, 42(3), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2023.2206803 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Lagon, M. P. (2015). Traits of transformative anti-trafficking partnerships. Journal of Human Trafficking, 1(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2015.1008883 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Macias-Konstantopoulos, W. L. (2016). Human trafficking: The role of medicine in interrupting the cycle of abuse and exploitation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 165(8), 582–588. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-0094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Malebranche, D. A., Hopper, E. K., & Corey, E. (2021). Sex and labor trafficking: Trauma-informed themes toward a social justice approach. In C. R. Figley, J. H. Duckworth, & E. J. Imber-Black (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal violence and abuse across the lifespan (pp. 2143–2170). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89999-2_43 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Martin, S., & Callaway, A. (2011). Human trafficking and smuggling. In A. Betts (Ed.), Global migration governance (pp. 133–152). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600458.003.0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Obokata, T. (2006). A human rights framework to address trafficking of human beings. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 24(3), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934410602400302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Oğuz, G. (2012). International cooperation in combating human trafficking in the EU: Evidence from Turkey. Irish Journal of Sociology, 20(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJS.20.1.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Ofak, L., & Vajda, M. M. (2019). Recommendations for improving the Croatian legal framework and measures for suppression and prevention of trafficking in human beings. Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu, 69(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.69.1.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Pajón, L., & Walsh, D. (2023). The importance of multi-agency collaborations during human trafficking criminal investigations. Policing and Society, 33(3), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2022.2106984 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Pittaro, M. (2015). Combating human trafficking: Recommendations for police leadership in establishing transnational collaboration. In M. Rahman, S. Yeoh, & L. Huang (Eds.), Cross-cultural collaboration and leadership in modern organizations (pp. 286–302). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8376-1.ch017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Rana, U., & Singh, R. (2025). Combating human trafficking: An integrative social and technological approach. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Ray, J. P. (2023). Conceptualizing task force sustainability. Societies, 13(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13020050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Rinaldi-Semione, J., & Brewster, B. (2023). Galvanizing local anti-trafficking partnership work using intelligence: Profiling the problem and building resilience. Societies, 13(3), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13030061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Saffanah, T., Rasito, Putra, D. I. A., & Yuliatin. (2024). Strengthening law enforcement and public awareness to combat human trafficking in Indonesia: Challenges and solutions. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum, 9(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v9i2.9686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Slamkov, G. (2025). The effectiveness of North Macedonia’s legal and institutional framework for combating human trafficking. Review of European and Comparative Law, 61(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.18482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Surtees, R. (2013). After trafficking: Experiences and challenges in the (re)integration of trafficked persons in the Balkans. Anti-Trafficking Review, 2(1), 64–95. https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Symeonidou-Kastanidou, E. (2016). Directive 2011/36/EU on combating trafficking in human beings: Fundamental choices and problems of implementation. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 7(4), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441600700406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Weitzer, R. (2014). New directions in research on human trafficking. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214521562 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Zimmerman, C., & Kiss, L. (2017). Human trafficking and exploitation: A global health concern. PLOS Medicine, 14(11), e1002437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
- Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
- Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
- Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
- Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions