Political Orientation as Mediator of Organizational Culture and Public Service Motivation: Context of a Local Government Unit

This study examined whether political orientation mediates the relationship between organizational culture and public service motivation among employees of a Philippine Local Government Unit. A descriptive-correlational research design was implemented, with data collected from 360 employees using a structured survey questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, regression analysis, MedGraph, and the Sobel z-test. The results indicated that organizational culture, political orientation, and public service motivation were at high levels among respondents. Organizational culture demonstrated a significant positive relationship with public service motivation. Political orientation was also significantly associated with both organizational culture and public service motivation. Mediation analysis identified a significant partial mediation effect of political orientation (Sobel z = 4.27, p < 0.05), accounting for 25.41% of the total effect, with an indirect-to-direct effect ratio of 0.34. The total effect (β = 0.582) decreased but remained significant when political orientation was included in the model (direct effect β = 0.434), confirming partial mediation. These findings suggest that political orientation strengthens the influence of organizational culture on employees’ motivation to serve the public. In practice, the results imply that Local Government Units can enhance public service motivation by developing organizational cultures that foster positive political orientations among employees. This may be achieved through leadership initiatives, transparent governance practices, and targeted human resource development, thereby fostering a more motivated and committed public workforce. The study provides empirical evidence on the mediating mechanisms that influence public service motivation and offers actionable recommendations to improve the effectiveness of leadership and governance in Philippine Local Government Units.

public administration, organizational culture, political orientation

1. Abenoja, Z., Dela Cruz, J., & Ramos, R. (2021). Governance and public service motivation in Philippine local government units. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 65(2), 123–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andersen, L. B., Moynihan, D. P., & Tummers, L. (2021). Behaviorally informed governance: Behavioral public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arnab, R. (2017). Survey sampling theory and applications. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Belle, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2020). Social motives, motivation, and public service performance. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 442–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Belle, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2022). Public service motivation: The state of the art. International Public Management Journal, 25(1), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dagohoy, J. A., & Dura, N. D. (2022). The influence of organizational culture on public service motivation among local government employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 44(1), 56–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Duan, Y., Li, Z., & Chen, X. (2024a). Political trust and employee behavior in public organizations. Public Management Review. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Duan, Y., Liu, C., & Zhang, J. (2024b). Political orientation, organizational climate, and public service motivation: Evidence from East Asia. Public Administration Review, 84(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Harari, M. B., Parola, H. R., Hartwell, C. J., & Riegelman, A. (2017). Literature searches in systematic reviews. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Homberg, F., McCarthy, D., & Tabvuma, V. (2019). Public service motivation and job performance. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12955 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Díez-Medrano, J., & Puranen, B. (Eds.). (2020). World values survey: Round seven – country-pooled datafile. JD Systems Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kim, S., & Vandenabeele, W. (2023). Public service motivation theory: Recent developments and future directions. Public Administration, 101(3), 489–508. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lagura, G. B. (2025). Towards digital governance divide index development: Evaluating city government websites in the Philippines. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.69650/jcdrhs.2025.717 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. McCombes, S. (2019). Descriptive and correlational research designs. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/correlational-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Meyer-Sahling, J. H., Mikkelsen, K. S., & Schuster, C. (2021). Civil service management and corruption. Public Administration, 99(2), 334–350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). The role of organizational culture in public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Quaranta, M. (2017). Political orientation and public service motivation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(1), 91–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A., & Neumann, O. (2020). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Schuster, C., & Christian, M. S. (2022). Political ideology and public service motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 147–170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. United Nations. (2023). Sustainable development goals report 2023. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
• Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
• Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
• Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
• The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark