Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Algebra and Geometry: Implementation of the Mathematical Modelling Framework for Ghana (MMF-Gh)

Authors

Joseph Amoah

Department of Mathematics Education, University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial, Development, Kumasi, Ghana (Ghana)

Ebenezer Bonyah

Department of Mathematics Education, University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Kumasi, Ghana (Ghana)

Joseph Frank Gorden

Department of Mathematics Education, University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Kumasi, Ghana (Ghana)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.101000214

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/10 | Page No: 2804-2816

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-10-08

Accepted: 2026-10-13

Published: 2026-10-31

Abstract

This study examined pre-service mathematics teachers’ perceptions of mathematical modelling, changes in their instructional practices, and differences in students’ conceptual understanding scores following the implementation of the Mathematical Modelling Framework for Ghana (MMF-Gh). The quantitative component employed a one-group pre-test–post-test design involving 60 pre-service mathematics teachers from two selected Colleges of Education and 400 Junior High School students. Two mathematics education experts contributed to the review and refinement of the framework. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, lesson-plan evaluation rubrics, classroom observation instruments, and pre- and post-tests. Descriptive statistics and paired-samples t-tests were used for analysis. Before implementation, 85.0% of participating pre-service teachers agreed or strongly agreed that mathematical modelling was important in mathematics teaching. Post-intervention lesson-plan scores were significantly higher across all assessed criteria (p < .01). Observed instructional time allocated to teacher-led exposition decreased from 85.0% to 40.0%, while student-centred activities increased from 15.0% to 60.0%. Students’ post-test scores were significantly higher in algebraic reasoning, geometric visualization, problem-solving skills, and mathematical communication (p < .01), with mean differences ranging from 23.0 to 30.0 percentage points. The findings document favourable initial perceptions and subsequent differences in instructional practices and student scores within the participating settings.

Keywords

Mathematical modelling; pre-service mathematics teachers; instructional practices; algebra; geometry; conceptual understanding; Ghana.

Downloads

References

1. Agyei, E., Agyei, D. D., & Benning, I. (2024). Teaching mathematics with digital technologies: A situational analysis of high school teachers’ experiences in Ghana. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 28(1), 57–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2023.2265241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arthur, Y. D., Boadu, S. K., & Asare, B. (2022). Effects of peer tutoring, teaching quality and motivation on mathematics achievement in senior high schools. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 37(1–3), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2022/37.1-3.1221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bannor, G. A., Boadu, S. K., & Arthur, Y. D. (2023). Effects of teaching quality, teaching competence, and mathematics connection on mathematics achievement motivation among senior high school students in Ghana. Matrix Science Mathematic, 7(2), 63–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. https://doi.org/10.26480/msmk.02.2023.63.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Blum, W., & Leiss, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Education, engineering and economics (pp. 222–231). Horwood Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099419.5.221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects—State, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302716 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Boadu, S. K., & Boateng, F. O. (2024). Enhancing students’ achievement in mathematics education in the 21st century through technology integration, collaborative learning, and student motivation: The mediating role of student interest. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(11), Article em2534. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15622 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Boadu, S. K., Arthur, Y. D., & Bonyah, E. (2023). Mediation and moderation effects of motivation and teaching quality on the relationship between peer tutoring and mathematics achievement. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(2), Article em039. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Boadu, S. K., Arthur, Y. D., & Dookurong, I. D. (2026). Impact of teacher quality on perceived mathematics performance: Mediating roles of technology, motivation, and student interest. Sustainable and Pedagogical Technologies, 2(1), e42035. https://doi.org/10.33902/SPT.202642035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Boadu, S. K., Boateng, F. O., & Obeng, B. A. (2026a). Factors influencing students’ interest in mathematics: A systematic literature review. American Journal of STEM Education, 25, 41-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Boadu, S. K., Boateng, F. O., & Obeng, B. A. (2026b). Impacts Of Lecturers Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Professional Development and Continuous Learning, And Lecturer-Student Relationship on Students’ Interest in Mathematics: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Matrix Science Mathematic (MSMK), 10(1), 08-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Boadu, S. K., Boateng, F. O., & Obeng, B. A. (2026c). Modeling students’ interest in mathematics: The role of self-efficacy, mathematics anxiety, cultural and societal perceptions, and relevance of mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1732581. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1732581 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Brown, J. P., Stillman, G. A., Galbraith, P. L., & Ng, K. E. D. (2024). Mathematical modelling of real-world phenomena. In C. Mesiti, W. T. Seah, B. Kaur, C. Pearn, A. Jones, S. Cameron, E. Every, & K. Copping (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2020–2023 (pp. 29–57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1964-8_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Erbas, A. K., Kertil, M., Çetinkaya, B., Çakıroğlu, E., Alacacı, C., & Baş, S. (2014). Mathematical modeling in mathematics education: Basic concepts and approaches. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 1621–1627. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.4.2039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Galbraith, P. (2007). Beyond the low hanging fruit. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 79–88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Guerrero-Ortiz, C., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ challenges in implementing mathematical modelling: Insights into reality. PNA, 16(4), 309–341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v16i4.21329 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. ZDM, 38(3), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652813 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kumazah, V., & Agyei, D. D. (2025). Enhancing high school geometry learning with inquiry-based teaching: Impact on student understanding, performance, and attitudes. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 21(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v21i1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2020). Mathematics common core programme (CCP): Curriculum for JHS1 (B7)–JHS3 (B9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://nacca.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/MATHEMATICS-CCP-B7-B9.pdf nacca.gov.gh [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles