Predicting Curriculum Fidelity: The Role of Individualized Consideration in Public Secondary School Leadership

Authors

Billy Joe M. Nicolas

Program Head, College of Education, World Citi Colleges, Guimba, Nueva Ecija, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500658

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 9830-9842

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-23

Accepted: 2026-05-28

Published: 2026-06-10

Abstract

This quantitative study investigated the predictive relationship between transformational leadership practices and curriculum fidelity among all public secondary school heads and teachers within the Guimba District, Nueva Ecija.
Methodology: Employing a descriptive-correlational research design, data were collected from a sample of 9 school heads and 90 teachers. Transformational leadership was evaluated across four dimensions (Idealized Influence, Inspirational Motivation, Intellectual Stimulation, and Individualized Consideration), while curriculum fidelity was measured through five components (Adherence, Exposure, Quality of Delivery, Participant Responsiveness, and Program Differentiation). Data were analyzed using ANOVA and stepwise multiple regression analysis.
Key Findings: Descriptive results revealed that Idealized Influence achieved the highest mean score among leadership dimensions, indicating that school heads are widely perceived as trusted role models. Within curriculum fidelity, Adherence ranked highest, reflecting a strong organizational emphasis on aligning school operations with national standards. While demographic variations in curriculum fidelity were initially observed based on civil status and experience, ANOVA confirmed that the most significant difference emerged when respondents were categorized by their organizational position (p = 0.001).
Regression Results and Conclusion: The overall regression model was statistically robust, explaining 80.4% of the variance in curriculum fidelity (R2 = 0.804, p = 0.032). At a 95% confidence level, stepwise multiple regression identified Individualized Consideration as the singular, statistically significant predictor of curriculum fidelity (β = 0.895, p = 0.009). These findings demonstrate that personalized support, coaching, and mentoring provided by school heads are the most critical drivers of faithful curriculum implementation. Consequently, targeted professional development focusing on individualized consideration is highly recommended to sustain high-quality curriculum execution across the district's public secondary schools.

Keywords

Transformational leadership, curriculum fidelity, individualized consideration, public secondary schools, regression analysis.

Downloads

References

1. Arcillo, M., Kilag, O. K. T., Guanzon, R. S., Navarro, R. B., Paez, A. T., & Pareja, J. Y. C. (2024). The Evolution of Curriculum Reform in the Philippines: The MATATAG Curriculum and its Role in the 21st Century. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(10), 217–221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, A., Khan, R., & Javed, F. (2024). Transformational leadership and teacher performance. Journal of Educational Leadership, 15(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Suer, S., & Kinay, I. (2022). Investigation of primary teachers' curriculum fidelity. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 12(1), 191-214. https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2022.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18(1), 23–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Rodulfa, L. (2022). School Heads' Instructional Leadership and Teachers' Sense of Efficacy in the Implementation of Blended Teaching Modality in Sarangani Province. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v2i1.35 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Wu, Y., & Dapat, R. O. (2025). Exploring the relationship of transformational leadership on teaching effectiveness and commitment towards teachers’ empowerment program. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384543811 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Zhang, J., Huang, Q., & Xu, J. (2022). Transformational leadership and teacher well-being: A systematic review. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372823618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rashid, S. N. A. B. M., & Wahab, J. L. A. (2024). Transformational Leadership Practices of Headmasters in Forming the Quality of Teachers in Transformation Schools 2025. Special Education [SE], 2(1), Article 31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Daria, I. P., & Gaytos, C. E. G. (2025). Transformational leadership style and teachers’ continuing professional development participation: Basis for an intervention program. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 14(2), 22–36. https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/2317291 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Boshra, A. Y., & Almutairi, J. A. (2025). The impact of transformational leadership and demographic factors on quality of nursing care: An empirical study in Riyadh. Middle East Journal of Health Sciences, 9(2), 176–189. https://mjhs-mu.org/index.php?fulltxt=227008&fulltxtj=176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Academia, J. R. (2025). Transformational leadership skills of head teachers: Their influence on school effectiveness. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388586918 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles