Predictive Effects of Core Subject Grades on Senior High School Strand Selection

Authors

Gerlie D. Bornea

College of Development and Management, University of Southeastern Philippines (Philippines)

Joeteddy B. Bugarin

College of Development and Management, University of Southeastern Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100222

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 2851-2864

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-24

Accepted: 2025-12-29

Published: 2026-01-31

Abstract

This study examined whether Grade 10 core-subject grades (English, Mathematics, and Science) can be used to provide a preliminary, grades-only screening of Senior High School (SHS) strand options (ABM, HUMSS, STEM, and TVL). Using multinomial logistic regression on 400 student records, English emerged as the strongest predictor, with Mathematics and Science contributing more modestly in selected comparisons. In classification, the grades-only model correctly classified 215 of 400 cases (overall accuracy = 53.75%). Preliminary grades-only screening achieved an overall accuracy of 53.75%, constrained by grade profile overlap across strands. Strand-level performance varied substantially (ABM = 17.4%, HUMSS = 49.2%, STEM = 75.0%, TVL = 74.6%), indicating limited separability for strands with similar grade patterns. These results support the use of grades as an initial filter to narrow counseling conversations, but not as a stand-alone placement or decision-making tool without complementary measures such as interest inventories, aptitude assessments, and structured guidance inputs.

Keywords

Multinomial logistic regression, Senior High School ABM (Accountancy, Business and Management Strand)

Downloads

References

1. Adarlo, G., & Jackson, L. (2017). For Whom Is K-12 Education: A Critical Look into Twenty-First Century Educational Policy and Curriculum in the Philippines. In S. Choo, D. Sawch, A. Villanueva, & R. Vinz (Eds.), Educating for the 21st Century (pp. 207–223). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1673-8_11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adlya, S. I., & Zola, N. (2022). Holland’s Theory of Guiding Individual Career Choices. Jurnal Neo Konseling, 4(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.24036/00698kons2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alinea, J. M., Garcia, C., Lagado, S., & Noblefranca, S. M. (2024). Employability Skills of Senior High School Tech-Voc Students: A Measure of Industry Preparedness. Interdisciplinary Research Review, 19(4), 63–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alsayed, A. O., Rahim, M. S. M., AlBidewi, I., Hussain, M., Jabeen, S. H., Alromema, N., Hussain, S., & Jibril, M. L. (2021). Selection of the Right Undergraduate Major by Students Using Supervised Learning Techniques. Applied Sciences, 11(22), 10639. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210639 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Balontong, R. (2024). C4.5 Decision Tree Algorithm and Linear Regression in Guidance and Counseling Decision Support System. Journal of Innovative Technology Convergence, 6(1). https://doi.org/DOI:%2520https://doi.org/10.69478/JITC2024v6n2a12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bejar, R. Jr. (2024). Precision in Progress: Leveraging Data Mining Technique to Empower Career Path Selection for Incoming Senior High School Students. RSIS International.Org, 178–191. https://doi.org/DOI:%2520https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.801014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Borghosh, P. R. M. (2024). Predictive Analytics Techniques in Education by Artificial Intelligence Tools for Enhancing Academic Assessment: Systematic Review. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijel.2024.401345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. C. Acosta, I., & S. Acosta, A. (2016). Teachers’ Perceptions on Senior High School Readiness of Higher Education Institutions in the Philippines. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(10), 2435–2450. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Clinical Research Centre, Sarawak General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuching, Malaysia, Bujang, M. A., Sa’at, N., Biostatistics Unit, National Clinical Research Centre, Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Tg Abu Bakar Sidik, T. M. I., Biostatistics Unit, National Clinical Research Centre, Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Chien Joo, L., & Clinical Research Centre, Sarawak General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuching, Malaysia. (2018). Sample Size Guidelines for Logistic Regression from Observational Studies with Large Population: Emphasis on the Accuracy Between Statistics and Parameters Based on Real Life Clinical Data. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 25(4), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2018.25.4.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dangoy, J. E., & Madrigal, D. V. (2020). Career Preferences and Factors Influencing the Career Choice of Senior High Students of a Catholic School. Philippine Social Science Journal, 3(2), 95–96. https://doi.org/doi:10.52006/main.v3i2.235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Department of Education. (2025). The Strengthened Senior High School Program Shaping Paper. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/SHAPE-PAPER-BCD-a_o-May-22.pdf?utm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Desvikayati, I., Daharnis, & Ifdil. (2025). Analysis Of Holland’s Theory In Career Decision Making Of Vocational High School Students. Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.58432/mahir.v4i1.1213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dirin, A., & Saballe, C. A. (2022). Machine Learning Models to Predict Students’ Study Path Selection. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 16(01), 158–183. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i01.20121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. EDCOM 2 Communications. (2025). DepEd, CHED should review proposed SHS electives, college subjects to ensure they are implementation-ready. EDCOM 2. The Second Congressional Commission on Education. https://edcom2.gov.ph/deped-ched-should-review-proposed-shs-electives-college-subjects-to-ensure-they-are-implementation-ready/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hartmann, F., Heine, J.-H., & Ertl, B. (2021). Concepts and Coefficients Based on John L. Holland’s Theory of Vocational Choice—Examining the R Package holland. Psych, 3(4), 728–750. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3040047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hernandez, R., & Atienza, R. (2021). CAREER TRACK PREDICTION USING DEEP LEARNING MODEL BASED ON DISCRETE SERIES OF QUANTITATIVE CLASSIFICATION. Applied Computer Science, 17(4), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.35784/acs-2021-29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ignacio, A. A., & Bajet, A. P. (2025). Assessing the Implementation of Senior High School Mathematics Curriculum: Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions in Calbayog City Division, Philippines. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 6(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2025.6.1.918 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Khan, W. U., Ghazi, S. R., Ali, A., & Khan, F. (2025). Quality of Primary Education in Bannu Division: An Analysis of Quality of Input, Process, and Output Indicators. ProScholar Insights, 4(3), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.55737/psi.2025c-43109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lee, F. (2025). What is logistic regression? https://chatgpt.com/c/68bc99db-9dc0-8325-b896-e70e9315d0ad [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Malipot, M. (2025). K to 12 Program: 11 years of transforming Philippine education. MB125. https://125.mb.com.ph/k-to-12-program-11-years-of-transforming-philippine-education/?utm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nazareno, A. L., Lopez, M. J. F., Gestiada, G. A., Martinez, M. P., & Roxas-Villanueva, R. M. (2019). An artificial neural network approach in predicting career strand of incoming senior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1245(1), 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1245/1/012005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nyoni, E. (2018). Instructional Interventions Used To Develop Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency in the Teaching of a Content Area Subject Language Learners. Rethinking Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century, 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pärli, R. (2023). How input, process, and institutional factors influence the effects of transdisciplinary research projects. Environmental Science & Policy, 140, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.11.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sadjail, S.-I. A., Sansawi, D. J., & Matolo, M.-A. L. (2022). Factors Influencing Students in Choosing their College Course. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(8), 697–700. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sarona-Pedro, D. S. (2025). Mixed Method Study on Course Shifting among College Students. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Shankhdhar, A., Agrawal, A., Sharma, D., Chaturvedi, S., & Pushkarna, M. (2020). Intelligent decision support system using decision tree method for student career. 2020 International Conference on Power Electronics & IoT Applications in Renewable Energy and Its Control (PARC), 140–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sidek, M. R. E. B., Impil, J. A. D., Marcos, M. J. B., Punzalan, E. E. M., Ramos, J. T., & Ador, Z. I. (2023). Exploring Course Mismatch among Former STEM Students: A Narrative Research. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(7), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i07.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Vargas, P. C. (2024). Predictive Analysis Application for Academic Student Advancement in Secondary Education Institutions. Journal of Innovative Technology Convergence, 6(1). https://doi.org/DOI:%2520https://doi.org/10.69478/JITC2024v6n2a04 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Varoquaux, G. (2018). Cross-validation failure: Small sample sizes lead to large error bars. NeuroImage, 180, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wang (汪茂华), M., & Liu (刘华聪), H. (2025). School-to-School Collaboration, Student Learning Outcomes, and Mediating Factors: Evidence From Shanghai’s Strong School Project. ECNU Review of Education, 20965311251330932. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311251330932 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. YU, C., & Upah, S. (2018). Data Analytics and STEM Student Success: The Impact of Predictive Analytics-Informed Academic Advising Among Undeclared First-Year Engineering Students. Sage Journals, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025118772307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhang, B., Li, S., Hounie, I., Bastani, O., Ding, D., & Ribeiro, A. (2025). Alignment of large language models with constrained learning (Version 2). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2505.19387 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Гриценок, І. (2025). ЗМІСТ ПРОФЕСІЙНОЇ ОРІЄНТАЦІЇ ТА КОНСУЛЬТУВАННЯ З КАР’ЄРИ ЗДОБУВАЧІВ ФАХОВОЇ ПЕРЕДВИЩОЇ ОСВІТИ. B U L L E T I N OF OLEKSANDR DOVZHENKO HLUKHIV NATIONAL PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY, 2(58), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.31376/2410-0897-2025-2-58-114-123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles