Prepositional Errors Among Malay MUET Band 3 Students: An Error Analysis Approach
Authors
Pusat Pembelajaran Bahasa, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka (MALAYSIA)
Pusat Pembelajaran Bahasa, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka (MALAYSIA)
Kolej Vokasional Dungun, 23000 Dungun, Terengganu (MALAYSIA)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100362
Subject Category: Language
Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 4631-4637
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-19
Accepted: 2025-11-26
Published: 2025-12-11
Abstract
This study examines the prepositional errors produced by MUET Band 3 undergraduates at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia using an error analysis framework. A written test adapted from various books was administered to 30 Malay L1 respondents. A total of 354 prepositional errors were identified and analysed across spatial (place, position, direction) and temporal (time) categories. Errors were classified into subtypes of wrong selection, omission, and unnecessary insertion. Findings show an almost equal distribution between spatial (50.8%) and temporal (49.2%) errors, with wrong selection accounting for 94% of all errors. The prominence of these errors indicates strong L1 transfer influences and incomplete mastery of English prepositional systems, which differ significantly from Malay. The study provides pedagogical implications for English language instructors in Malaysia, highlighting the need for focused instruction on prepositional usage and cross-linguistic contrasts.
Keywords
error analysis, prepositions, Malay learners, MUET, L1 interference
Downloads
References
1. Riffin, K., & Abdul Rahman, S. (2020). L1 influence in ESL learners’ misuse of English prepositions. Asmah Haji Omar. 2000. Time in Malay Grammar: English in Malaysia: A Typology of its Status and Role. In Chan Swee Heng, Mohammad A. Quayum, Rosli Talif (ed) Diverse Voices: Readings in Languages, Literatures and Cultures: 22-34. Serdang: University Putra Malaysia Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Chan, W. L., & Abdullah, M. R. T. L. (2022). Error analysis of Malaysian ESL learners’ prepositional usage. Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 10(1), 55–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Corder, S. P. (1974). Error Analysis and Remedial Teaching. Paper presented at the International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language (IATEFL) Conference, Budapest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED101573). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Darus, S., & Subramaniam, K. (2009). Error Analysis of the Written English Essays of Secondary School Students in Malaysia: A Case Study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 483–495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Hassan, A., & Fattah, M. (2023). Challenges of English prepositional acquisition among EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 22–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Jalali, A., & Shoja, S. (2021). Preposition learning difficulties in EFL contexts: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Linguistic Research, 14(2), 12–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Koh, S. L. 2012. Complete Grammar Guide. Penerbit Ilmu Bakti Sdn. Bhd. And Tan, C., et.all. Focus SPM: Form 4 and 5. 2017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Lindstromberg, S. 1991. (Re)teaching Prepositions. English Teaching Forum, 29: 47-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Nourmohammadi, E., & Shakeri, N. (2020). An analysis of prepositional errors in EFL writing. Studies in English Language Teaching, 8(4), 532–548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Rahman, N. F., & Ariffin, Z. (2021). Malay learners’ developmental patterns in English preposition use. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(2), 142–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Saidalvi, A., Saad, N., & Aziz, M. (2020). Cross-linguistic influence in Malaysian ESL learners’ grammar. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(4), 3171–3184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Shamsudin, N., Jalaluddin, N., & Yunus, K. (2021). Omission and insertion errors among Malaysian ESL learners. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(1), 20–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Wong, Y. Y. 1987. An investigation of errors in the written English compositions of Chinese form two students in a Malaysian school. B.A. Thesis. Bangi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Yogeswaran, June., et. all. 2015. Good Grammar Guide: Book 2. Penerbit Ilmu Bakti Sdn Bhd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
- Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
- Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
- Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
- Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests