Primary ESL Teachers’ Perceptions of AI Tools for Pupils’ Speaking Practice: Opportunities and Limitations

Authors

Kong Ming Yien

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor (Malaysia)

Melor Md Yunus

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor (Malaysia)

Hanita Hanim Ismail

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100171

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 2148-2162

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-18

Accepted: 2025-11-27

Published: 2025-12-03

Abstract

This study explores Malaysian primary school English teachers’ perceptions of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to support pupils’ speaking practice. Although AI integration is accelerating globally, research focusing specifically on AI-supported speaking instruction in primary ESL classrooms remains limited. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study examines both the perceived opportunities and challenges of AI integration with emphasis on how teachers evaluate the usefulness, ease of use and overall applicability of AI tools such as ChatGPT in developing young learners’ speaking skills. A mixed-methods survey design was employed involving 60 English teachers from public primary schools in Selangor. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics to identify trends in teachers’ perceptions of AI’s pedagogical benefits and limitations while qualitative data from open-ended responses were analysed thematically to provide deeper insights into teachers’ experiences. Findings indicate that teachers view AI as a highly valuable resource for enhancing oral proficiency, offering instant and personalised feedback, reducing pupils’ speaking anxiety and creating engaging, interactive learning environments. Teachers also highlighted that AI expands opportunities for self-paced practice beyond the classroom, especially for shy or low-confidence learners. Despite these benefits, significant challenges emerged. Teachers expressed concerns about unreliable internet connectivity, limited device availability, inaccurate speech recognition especially for young children’s voices, insufficient training, data privacy issues and pupils’ potential overreliance on AI-generated responses. These challenges highlight the need for stronger infrastructure support, targeted professional development, curriculum-aligned AI content and clear ethical guidelines. Overall, the study underscores the promising role of AI as a complementary tool for supporting speaking development in Malaysian primary ESL settings while emphasising the systemic and pedagogical considerations required for sustainable implementation.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, ESL speaking practice, primary education

Downloads

References

1. Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A. & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education?. Computers in Human Behavior. 132 (2): 1-9. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Zheng, C., & Chen, M. (2022). Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middlechools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5187–5208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11286-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aziz, A. A., & Kashinathan, S. (2021). ESL Learners’ Challenges in Speaking English in Malaysian Classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 983–991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. British Educational Research Association [BERA]. (2024). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (5th ed.). www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethicalguidelines-for-educational- research-2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chali, M. T., Eshete, S. K. & Debela, K. L. 2022. Learning How Research Design Methods Work: A Review of Creswell’s Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches. The Qualitative Report. 27(12): 2956-2960. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Firdaus, A., & Nawaz, S. (2024). Viewpoints of teachers about the usage of artificial intelligence in ELT: Advantages and obstacles.University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics & Literature, 8(1), 82-93 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hamayun, M., Saeed, A. Amin, I. & Chapra, L. (2025). AI Supported Differentiated Instruction Cognitive and Emotional Outcomes for Diverse Learners . The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies. 3(3): 469-486. DOI: 10.59075/crsss [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hidayah, A. N., Riyati, D. & Gres, E. (2025). AI-powered pronunciation tools: supporting english learners in multilingual classrooms who dislike english in pontianak. Wiralodra English Journal 9(1):13-26. DOI:10.31943/wej.v9i1.350 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Junaidi, N. H. & Jamaludin, K. A. (2024). The Challenges of Digitization of Education Among Primary School Teachers: Through Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development. 13(3): 2364-2376. DOI:10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/22144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kafabih, A., Herda, R.K. & Monteza, A. M. M. (2025). Classroom Praxis of Applied Oral Communication Strategies in Enhancing English Speaking Skills in Indonesian Secondary School. Research and Innovation in Applied Linguistics-Electronic Journal 3(2):195-214 DOI:10.31963/rial.v3i2.5526 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kotsis, K. T. (2025). Issues between Artificial Intelligence and Personal Data in Education. International Research in Education. 13(1): 45-65. DOI:10.5296/ire.v13i1.22850 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mahmoud, C. F. & Sorensen, J. T. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning with a Focus on Current Developments and Future Prospects. Research and Advances in Education 3(8):25-31. DOI:10.56397/RAE.2024.08.04 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mudaway, A. M. A. (2025). Exploring EFLLearners’Perceptions on the Use ofAI-Powered Conversational Tools to Improve Speaking Fluency: ACase Study at Majmaah University. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(1): 590-598. https://journals.bilpubgroup.com/index.php/fls [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nhan, L. K., Hao, N. T. M. & Quang, Luong, V, Nhat. (2025). Revolutionizing speaking skills improvement: AI’s role in personalized language learning. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies 8(2):4637-4649. DOI:10.53894/ijirss.v8i2.6408 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pakpaha, F. H. & Saragih, M. (2022). Theory Of Cognitive Development By Jean Piaget. Journal of Applied Linguistics 2(2):55-60. DOI:10.52622/joal.v2i2.79 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sangeetha, L. & Jamaludin, K.A. (2025). Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools in Empowering the Teaching of English-Speaking Skills: Benefits and Challenges. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 14(4): 1-12. DOI:10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i4/26466 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shakri, M. A. M., Ngoi, G. P. Saari, K. A. & Marliana, N. L. (2025). The Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence Technology Among Language Teachers in Facing Current Educational Challenges. Journal of ICT in Education. 12(2): 138-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol12.2.9.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sivanganam, J., Yunus, M.M. & Said, N. E. M. (2025). Teachers’ Perceptions in Using ArtificialIntelligence (AI) in ESL Classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 14(1): 2409-2427. DOI:10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/25034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sulaiman, R. B. A., Bin Hassan, H., Kemanusiaan, S. P. (2024). E-Learning Readiness From the Aspects of Attitude, Literacy, Facilities and Access to Technology Among Religious Secondary School Students in the State of Pahang. Al-Sirat Journal, 24(1). https://ejournal.unipsas.edu.my/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tatchakrit, M., Ruedeerath, C. & Joey, A. L. S. (2024). “I think I speak without hesitation”: Learning-Oriented Assessment to Enhance English Oral Communication of Thai Pre-Service Teachers. rEFLections. 31(3). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1459980.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Teo, T. (2011). Technology Acceptance Research in Education: A Review of the Literature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. 24. Vincent, J., Yunus, M. M. & Said, N. E. M. (2025). Using AI Platforms to Improve Listening and Speaking Skills in ESL Primary Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Prohressive Education and Development. 14(1): 1829-1843. DOI:10.6007/IJARPED/v14- i1/24848 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zhang, C., Meng, Y. & Ma, X. Artificial intelligence in EFL speaking: Impact on enjoyment, anxiety, and willingness to communicate. 121(3). DOI:10.1016/j.system.2024.103259 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zou, B. et al. (2024). Exploring EFL learners’ perceived promise and limitations of using an artificial intelligence speech evaluation system for speaking practice. System. 126(103497): 1-24. 10.1016/j.system.2024.103497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zulkarnain, N. S., & Yunus, M. M. (2023). Primary Teachers’ Perspectives on Using Artificial Intelligence Technology in English as a Second Language Teaching and Learning: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 861–875. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles