Principals’ Perceptions of Their Role in Leading Digital Transformation: A Phenomenological Study
Authors
Faculty of Social and Life Sciences, Wrexham University, Wrexham, Wales, United KingdomFaculty of Social and Life Sciences, Wrexham University, Wrexham, Wales, United Kingdom (United Kingdom)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0135
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 1540-1557
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-04
Accepted: 2026-03-09
Published: 2026-03-23
Abstract
Digital transformation in education presents distinct challenges for rural public schools in the Philippines, where geographic isolation, infrastructure deficits, and resource scarcity constrain principals’ capacity to lead technological change. This study examines how primary school principals in a rural province in the Philippines perceive their role in leading digital transformation. Adopting a qualitative, interpretivist approach, this study used Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis to analyse semi-structured interviews with four school principals. Findings reveal four key themes: navigating infrastructure scarcity through resourcefulness, bridging generational and digital divides through distributed leadership, reconciling pedagogical innovation with socioeconomic realities, and cultivating adaptive cultures through consultative leadership. The study highlights inadequacies in top-down policies and underscores needs for sustained infrastructure investment, context-sensitive professional development, and formal recognition of distributed leadership in resource-constrained contexts.
Keywords
Digital Transformation, Educational Leadership, Rural Elementary Schools
Downloads
References
1. Aboderin, O. (2025). Toward sustainable ICT integration in Nigerian secondary schools: A four-pillar framework for systemic reform. Journal Plus Education, 33, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ainin, J., Sappayani, A., Sarazain, K., & Cagape, W. (2024). The unseen burden: Unveiling the lived experiences of school principals in implementing educational policy. International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 5(10), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.47505/IJRSS.2024.10.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alde, A. (2024). Digital leadership and school management capabilities of school administrators and teachers digital teaching performance: Basis for professional development program. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 1–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Alene, A., Tsegaye, M., & Wolle, G. (2025). Secondary school principals’ adaptive leadership practices amid the quality education crisis in Amhara regional state, Ethiopia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101349 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Alharahsheh, H., & Pius, A. (2020). A review of key paradigms: Positivism vs interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 39–43. DOI: 10.36348/gajhss.2020.v02i03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Almagro, A., Bacang, A., & Calumpang, E. (2025). Reflections on school governance: The lived experience of school heads. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(6), 460–466. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B., & Essel, D. D. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practices. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B. B., & Agbeko, M. (2025). The influence of digital professional development and professional learning communities in the relationship between school digital preparedness and digital instructional integration. PLoS ONE, 20(7), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328883 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Angrist, N., Bergman, P., & Matsheng, M. (2022). Experimental evidence on learning using low-tech when school is out. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 941–950. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01381-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Annisa, S. (2024). Criticism of the phenomenological approach (Understanding the limits of subjectivity and objectivity in research). Journal of Sumatera Sociological Indicators, 3(1), 238–243. https://doi.org/10.32734/jssi.v3i01.15896 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Anuada, M., & Macalisang, D. (2025). Offline learning resource materials: Their effectiveness in improving pupils’ academic performance. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 14(2), 1735–1740. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.14.2.0512 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Anwar, S., & Saraih, U. (2024). Digital leadership in the digital era of education: Enhancing knowledge sharing and emotional intelligence. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(6), 1581–1611.DOI: 10.1108/IJEM-11-2023-0540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Apata, S., Adeniyi, J., Ajiwoju, J., & Adeosun, K. (2025). Digital transformation in teaching: The preparedness of in-service teachers in Nigeria for the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). British Journal of Contemporary Education, 5(1), 16–33.DOI: 10.52589/BJCE-S8GBY9M3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Appiah-Okyere, J. A., Taana Smith, D., Kwaa-Aidoo, E. K., McKnight, L. W., & Osae, E. M. (2023). Transforming teachers’ professional development with technology innovation integration in Essuekyir, Ghana. In 2023 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC) (pp. 378–385). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/GHTC56179.2023.10354622 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Arrieta, G. (2020). Assessment of the ICT integration in teaching math and science in high school: Basis for an ICT program. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 21(1), 95–108. 10.23960/jpmipa/v21i1.pp95-108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Aruleba, K., & Jere, N. (2022). Exploring digital transforming challenges in rural areas of South Africa through a systematic review of empirical studies. Scientific African, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01190 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Banoğlu, K., Vanderlinde, R., Çetin, M., & Aesaert, K. (2022). Role of school principals' technology leadership practices in building a learning organization culture in public K–12 schools. Journal of School Leadership, 33(1), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846221134010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Barbosa Jr., R., & Coneway, B. (2023). The unique challenges and best practices for rural school principals: Attracting and retaining skilled teachers in small communities. School Leadership Review, 18(1), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Barrett, P., Treves, A., Shmis, T., Ambasz, D., & Ustinova, M. (2019). The impact of school infrastructure on learning: A synthesis of the evidence. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Beatrice, N. (2023). Influence of poverty on digital education in Uganda’s rural secondary schools: Reference to COVID-19 lockdown: A case study of Kayunga District in Uganda. Journal of Digitovation and Information System, 3(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.54433/JDIIS.2023100021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Bete, J., & Collera, A. (2025). Assessing the efficiency of the Learners Information System in a rural Philippine national high school. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(4), 483–494. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Bhengu, T., & Myende, P. (2016). Leadership for coping with and adapting to policy change in deprived contexts: Lessons from school principals. South African Journal of Education, 36(4), 1–10.DOI: 10.15700/saje.v36n4a1322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Boylan, M. (2016). Enabling adaptive system leadership: Teachers leading professional development. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 86–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216628531 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Castillo, L. (2018). Call of duty: A case study of ICT integration in Philippine provincial public school in San Isidro Davao Oriental post K–12 implementation. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v30i1.551 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Castro, B. (2023). Sustainability of the DepEd Computerization Program (DCP) of public elementary schools in Sta. Cruz district. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 4(10), 42–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Celeste, R., & Nimfa, O. (2024). Challenges and implementation of technology integration: Basis for enhanced instructional program. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 3(2), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v3i2.2656 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Chandramoulesh, G. (2025). Impact and challenges of digital education in rural areas. Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 10(3), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n3.034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Chua, Y., & Chua, Y. (2017). How are e-leadership practices in implementing a school virtual learning environment enhanced? A grounded model study. Computers & Education, 109, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Colicol, F., & Colicol-Rodriguez, E. (2025). Urban–rural divide and COVID-19: Engaging teachers to assess and improve the Philippine basic education-learning continuity plan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(3), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2195099 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. de Hoop, T., Ring, H., Siwach, G., Dias, P., Tembo, G., Rothbard, C., & Toungui, A. (2023). Impact of technology-aided activity-based learning approaches on learning outcomes: Experimental evidence from community schools in rural Zambia. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 17(4), 836–873.https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2023.2268072 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Department of Education. (2018). DepEd computerization program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2018/04/06/deped-computerization-program/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Department of Education. (2024). DepEd highlights Digital Rise program as key platform for educational technology. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2022/05/10/deped-highlights-digital-rise-program-as-key-player-in-addressing-challenges-in-education-quality/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Dunham, C. (2012). Principals’ roles and responsibilities in technology integration in rural Georgia [Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Southern University]. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/786/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Dunn, R. (2020). Adaptive leadership: Leading through complexity. International Studies in Educational Administration, 48(1), 31–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Elkordy, A., & Iovinelli, J. (2021). Competencies, culture, and change: A model for digital transformation in K–12 educational contexts. In D. Ifenthaler, S. Hofhues, M. Egloffstein, & C. Helbig (Eds.), Digital transformation of learning organizations (pp. 203–218). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Festus, O., & Emmanuel, O. (2025). Sociocultural and digital communication challenges in AI adoption for classroom communication: Insights from Nigerian colleges of education. Language, Technology, and Social Media, 3(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.70211/ltsm.v3i1.115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Gabriel, F., Marrone, R., Van Sebille, Y., Kovanovic, V., & de Laat, M. (2022). Digital education strategies around the world: Practices and policies. Irish Educational Studies, 41(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2022513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Gapoy-Landicho, W., & Martir, E. (2024). School readiness, integration and technical support to digital transformation. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 7(2), 224–240. DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v7i2p122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Handoyo, E., Soetrisno, Y., Rahmansyah, F., & Naufal, R. (2024). Community network as a solution to unequal internet access to education. World Journal of Advanced Research and Review, 24(2), 2164–2172. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.2.3550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Harris, A., & Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Education, 22(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020607085623 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143204039297 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Huang, R., Liu, D., Kanwar, A., Zhan, T., Yang, J., Zhuang, R., Liu, M., Li, Z., & Adarkwah, M. A. (2024). Global understanding of smart education in the context of digital transformation. Open Praxis, 16(4), 663–676.DOI: 10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Hugo, M., Casinillo, L., & Madrigal, D. (2023). Leadership and challenges: A phenomenological exploration of teacher-principals in the Philippines. Philippine Social Science Journal, 6(4), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v6i4.805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Jaraula, K. (2025). The status and instructional value of DepEd Computerization Program among secondary schools in Cagayan de Oro City: Input for policy implication. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1), 1–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Kawiana, I. (2023). Digital leadership: Building adaptive organizations in the digital age. Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu, 3(1), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.58471/jms.v3i01.2709 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Kershner, B., & McQuillan, P. (2016). Complex adaptive schools: Educational leadership and school change. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 13(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct23029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Kilcoyne, A. (2024). Navigating through disruption: How are school principals leading digital learning in secondary schools in Ireland? Computers in Schools, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2024.2374262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Kim, J., & Wargo, E. (2025). Empowering educational leaders for AI integration in rural STEM education: Challenges and strategies. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1567698 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Koh, G., Askell-Williams, H., & Barr, S. (2023). Sustaining school improvement initiatives: Advice from educational leaders. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 34(3), 298–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2190130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Koukouvinou, P., Simbi, & Holmström, J. (2023). Managing unbounded digital transformation: Exploring the role of tensions in a digital transformation initiative in the forestry industry. Information Technology & People, 36(8), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2020-0106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Laguador, J. (2021). Challenges encountered during pandemic in flexible learning among college students living in urban, rural, and suburban areas in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Perspectives, 8(1), 10–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Lindqvist, M. (2019). School leaders’ practices for innovative use of digital technologies in schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1226–1240.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12782 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Lopez, S. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in regional education: A holistic framework for inclusive, adaptive, and community-centric learning. Electronic Journal of Social and Strategic Studies, 6(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.47362/EJSSS.2025.6102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Lozano, M., Garcia, L., & Sandoval, C., Jr. (2023). Developing leadership for improvement: Iterative cycles and opportunities for learning. Impacting Education, 8(2), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Lumagbas, J., Smith, W., Care, E., & Scoular, C. (2019). Tablet computers in Philippine public schools: School-level factors that influence technology management and use. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1572535 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Malco, J. (2024). Leadership competencies and resiliencies of school administrators: Basis for improved organizational performance and governance. Guild of Educators in TESOL International Research Journal, 2(4), 174–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Mastul, A., de Vera, C., & Jayme, C. (2023). Understanding the use of EduTech in schools in the Philippines: Recommendation for effectiveness. Engineering Science Letter, 2(2), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.56741/esl.v2i02.307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Medina, J., Huamani, H., Astocondor, C., & Polo, A. (2025). Technologies in the classroom: Catalysts for change and potential obstacles. Education Journal, 14(3), 103–110. DOI: 10.11648/j.edu.20251403.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Mette, I. (2024). Instructional leadership in rural state: How position and rurality influence supervision, professional growth, and evaluation. Journal of Educational Supervision, 7(3), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.7.3.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Moloi, M., & Dlomo, S. (2024). Revitalizing rural areas by boosting educational advancement through social capital integration. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 5(4), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.53378/ijemds.353116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Mustafa, F., Nguyen, H., & Gao, X. (2024). The challenges and solutions of technology integration in rural schools: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 126, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102380 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Nadeem, M. (2024). Distributed leadership in educational contexts: A catalyst for school improvement. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100835 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Nappi, J. (2014). The teacher leader: Improving schools by building social capital through shared leadership. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 80, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Navaridas-Nalda, F., Clavel-San Emeterio, M., Fernandez-Ortiz, R., & Arias-Oliva, M. (2020). The strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Nedungadi, P., Menon, R., Gutjahr, G., & Raman, R. (2024). Evaluating holistic education and digital learning model for advancing SDG4: A longitudinal mixed effects modeling approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2299134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Nelson, T., & Squires, V. (2017). Addressing complex challenges through adaptive leadership: A promising approach to collaborative problem solving. Journal of Leadership Education, 16(4), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.12806/V16/I4/T2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Ng, D., & Ho, J. (2012). Distributed leadership for ICT reform in Singapore. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2012.664478 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. Nugroho, I., Wilujeng, & Pujaningsih. (2025). Digital transformation of HOTS assessment in elementary school science learning: Technological challenges, human resource readiness, and contribution to SDG’s achievement. In E3S Web of Conferences (INTERCONNECTS 2024). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562203004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
74. Ojong, A. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: Unmasking socioeconomic barriers to equitable access to digital tools in education. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 15(1), 1285–1300. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.15.1.1143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
75. Okunlola, J., & Suraiya, R. (2025). Digital leadership in education: A bibliometric analysis of research trends from 1993 to 2024. F1000Research, 14, 1–33. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.166667.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
76. Olanrewaju, G., Adebayo, S., Omotosho, A., & Olajide, C. (2021). Left behind? The effects of digital gaps on e-learning in rural secondary schools and remote communities across Nigeria during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
77. Osei, S., Quansah, J., & Aboagye, D. (2025). Ghanaian headteachers' and teachers' perspectives on distributed leadership practices in schools: A phenomenological inquiry. British Journal of Contemporary Education, 5(1), 76–92. DOI: 10.52589/BJCE-TJRUMF91 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
78. Otoo, B. (2020). Declaring my ontological and epistemological stance. The Journal of Educational Thought, 53(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/jet.v53i1.71097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
79. Paran, L., De Leon, J., & Pade, E. (2024). Challenges in technology integration for elementary teachers. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(12), 90–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
80. Park, Y., Konge, L., & Artino, A. R. (2020). The positivism paradigm of research. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 690–694. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
81. Peng, Y., Alias, B., Mansor, A., & Ismail, M. (2024). Charting the evolving landscape of digital leadership in education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.5925 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
82. Petersen, A.-L. (2014). Teachers' perceptions of principals' ICT leadership. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(4), 302–315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
83. Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2014). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
84. Prathees, D. (2025). Innovative digital leadership in education: Strategies for 21st century transformation. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management, 7(6), 325–338. DOI: 10.35629/5252-0706325338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
85. Prayoonvong, N., & Limwongthong, A. (2025). Digital leadership competencies for school administrators in Bangkok’s educational transformation. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(6), 2015–2021. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i6.10071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
86. Prestoza, M. (2024). Assessing remote learning feasibility: A comprehensive analysis of Philippine public-school teachers' use of learning management systems and blended learning approaches. Journal of Research, Policy and Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 14(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol14.1.3.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
87. Pringle, J., Hendry, C., & McLafferty, E. (2011). Phenomenological approaches: Challenges and choices. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 7–18. DOI: 10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.7.c8280 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
88. Rahimi, R., & Oh, G. (2024). Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: Navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00303-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
89. Rana, K., Greenwood, J., & Henderson, R. (2022). Teachers’ experiences of ICT training in Nepal: How teachers in rural primary schools learn and make progress in their ability to use ICT in classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.2014947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
90. Rodrigo, M. (2021). Impediments to AIS adoption in the Philippines. In R. Sottilare & J. Schwarz (Eds.), Adaptive instructional systems: Design and evaluation (pp. 412–421). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
91. Sarid, A. (2024). Crossing boundaries: Connecting adaptive leadership and social justice leadership for educational contexts. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(5), 1009–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1942995 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
92. Shabalala, N. (2025). Challenges, opportunities and strategies of distributed leadership in managing environmental education curriculum in South African secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 6(1), 98–135. https://doi.org/10.53378/ijemds.353156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
93. Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times (2nd ed.). Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
94. Shi, H., & Ma, L. (2025). Embedding local cultural richness in English language education: A place-based dual-core approach for rural schools in China. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1580324 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
95. Singh, K., Gupta, M., & Rao, A. (2025). Developing digital competence among educators in rural India. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Education, 3(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.70177/jete.v3i1.2112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
96. Sirris, S. (2022). Researchers’ role reflexivity when studying values work. In G. Espedal, B. Jelstad Løvaas, S. Sirris, & A. Wæraas (Eds.), Researching values (pp. 215–224). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90769-3_12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
97. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776278.ch10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
98. Sönmez, E., Öğdem, Z., & Emre, E. (2023). Examining the leadership behaviours of primary school principals: A phenomenological study. TAY Journal, 7(2), 518–550. https://doi.org/10.29329/tayjournal.2023.543.08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
99. Sott, M., & Bender, M. (2025). The role of adaptive leadership in times of crisis: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Merits, 5(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits5010002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
100. Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
101. Sumiati, S., Kurniady, D. A., Komariah, A., Suryana, A., Dadi, D., & Hafidh, Z. (2024). Linking principal adaptive leadership to teacher performance: The mediating effect of collaborative school culture. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 15(4), 17–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
102. Taglietti, D. (2020). Digitalising Italian school leadership. In E. Samier & P. Milley (Eds.), Educational administration and leadership identity formation: International theories, problems and challenges (pp. 184–201). Taylor & Francis Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
103. Tahmasebi, F. (2023). The digital divide: A qualitative study of technology access in rural communities. AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(2), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.1.2.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
104. Tan, S., & Ong, K. (2011). Distributed leadership for integration of information and communication technology (ICT) in schools. In ASCILITE 2011: Changing demands, changing directions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
105. Tanio, E., & Wibawanta, B. (2024). Adaptive leadership as leadership strategy on curriculum change: A case study in XYZ school. Journal of Basic Educational Studies, 4(3), 1583–1592. https://doi.org/10.47467/edu.v4i3.4267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
106. Tanucan, J., Negrido, C., & Malaga, G. (2022). Digital leadership of school heads and job satisfaction of teachers in the Philippines during the pandemic. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
107. Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
108. Tsakeni, M., Munje, P., & Jita, L. (2023). Exploring school improvement opportunities through distributed leadership practices for science and mathematics in South African schools. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 5(3), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.2023.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
109. van den Akker, J. (2010). Building bridges: How research may improve curriculum policies and classroom practices. In S. Stoney (Ed.), Beyond Lisbon 2010: Perspectives from research and development for educational policy in Europe (pp. 175–195). CIDREE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
110. Villaseñor, R. (2024). Challenges and dilemmas of digitalization in Philippine education: A grassroots perspective. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 14(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v14i2.22325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
111. Voogt, J., & McKenney, S. (2016). TPACK in teacher education: Are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1174730 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
112. Wang, L., & Huang, Y. (2025). The influence of digital literacy challenges on the enhancement of teaching abilities among rural educators: Evidence from Western Guangdong, China. International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research, 11(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20251102.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
113. Willermark, S., Gellerstedt, M., & Nilsson, P. (2023). Surviving or thriving? Exploring school leaders’ perception of initiated digital transformation. School Leadership & Management, 44(3), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2282618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
114. Xin, Y., Hamid, A., & Mansor, A. (2025). Systematic insights for educational sustainability: Principals' digital leadership and teacher professional performance. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(8), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.4067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
115. Yang, Q., Alias, B., & Nor, M. (2025). Principals' technology leadership and teachers' ICT integration: A systematic review on capacity building for quality improvement and sustainable education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(9), 211–234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
116. Yanow, D. (2013). Neither rigorous nor objective. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 97–119). Taylor & Francis Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
117. Yusoff, Z. J. M., Abidin, M. H. Z., Mahmud, W. M. W., Yusoff, S. H. M., & Yahya, N. (2023). Adaptive leadership as a catalyst for educational digitization. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 13(2), 1084–1094. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
118. Yutong, J., & Jamaludin, K. (2025). Enhancing digital literacy in rural education: Strategies for strengthening TPACK among primary school teachers. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(7), 880–884. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90700071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
119. Zhao, W. (2024). A study of the impact of the new digital divide on the ICT competences of rural and urban secondary school teachers in China. Heliyon, 10(7), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
120. Zou, Y., Kuek, F., Feng, W., & Cheng, X. (2025). Digital learning in the 21st century: Trends, challenges, and innovations in technology integration. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study