Project-Based Learning in Early Mathematics Education: A Recent Systematic Review
Authors
Sultan Idris Education University, Perak (Malaysia)
Sultan Idris Education University, Perak (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100573
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 7405-7419
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-04
Accepted: 2026-02-10
Published: 2026-02-18
Abstract
Project-Based Learning (PBL), also commonly referred to as Project-Based Learning (PjBL), has received increasing scholarly attention in early mathematics education due to its potential to support meaningful learning, strengthen problem-solving abilities, and foster 21st-century competencies from an early age. Despite this growing interest, empirical research examining its classroom implementation, learning outcomes, and instructional challenges in early mathematics contexts remains fragmented and, in some cases, inconsistent. To address this gap, the present systematic literature review synthesises recent empirical studies on the application of PBL/PjBL in early mathematics education, with particular attention to learner outcomes, teacher readiness, and innovations in instructional design. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the review analysed peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2023 and 2025 and indexed in the Scopus and ERIC databases. Following a rigorous screening and eligibility process, 21 primary studies were retained for thematic analysis. The synthesis identified three overarching themes: (1) learning outcomes associated with PBL/PjBL, including conceptual understanding, problem-solving skills, collaboration, and creativity; (2) challenges related to teacher readiness, professional capacity, and assessment practices; and (3) innovation and design features of PBL/PjBL models, including structured scaffolding, digital integration, and context-based project design. Overall, the findings indicate that while PBL/PjBL holds considerable promise for enhancing early mathematics learning, its effectiveness is highly dependent on teacher preparation, alignment of assessment approaches, and context-sensitive instructional design. This review therefore provides a structured evidence base to inform professional development, curriculum planning, and future empirical and design-based research in early mathematics education.
Keywords
Project-Based Learning (PBL/PjBL), Early Mathematics Education, 21st-Century Skills, Teacher Readiness, Systematic Literature Review
Downloads
References
1. Abouzahra, A., Sabraoui, A., & Afdel, K. (2020). Model composition in Model Driven Engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 125(May), 106316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ahmad, A., Akhsani, L., & Mohamed, Z. (2023). The Profile Of Students’ Mathematical Representation Competence, Self-Confidence, And Habits Of Mind Through Problem-Based Learning Models. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p323-338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alashwal, H. A., & Barham, A. I. (2025). Sustaining problem-based learning: A mixed-methods exploration of its long-term effects on primary students’ mathematical problem solving. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101717 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Alenezi, A. (2023). Using Project-Based Learning through the Madrasati Platform for Mathematics Teaching in Secondary Schools. In International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (Vol. 19, Issue 1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Anugraheni, I., Ghufron, A., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2025). The impact of realistic problem-based learning on mathematical connection abilities: evidence from elementary schools in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2523078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bakait, M., Tajudin, N. M., Masri, R., & Awi, M. (2021). Development of SPARE Method by Integrating the Project-Based Learning and Realistic Mathematics Education for Mathematics Learning. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(4), 918–927. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.8006806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. del Valle-Ramón, D., Muñoz-Repiso, A. G.-V., & Gómez-Pablos, V. B. (2020). Project-based learning through the youtube platform for teaching mathematics in primary education. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.20272 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Drobnič Vidic, A. (2023). Comparison of Interdisciplinary Connections between Mathematics and other Subjects through Student-Centered Approaches. REDIMAT, 12(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.10178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Elsayed, A., Wardat, Y., Alawaed, M., & Albaraami, Y. (2025). The effect of employing project-web learning approach in teaching mathematics instruction methods course on developing the mind habits among Dhofar University students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15930 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Goldstein, O. (2016). A project-based learning approach to teaching physics for pre-service elementary school teacher education students. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1200833 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Gu, P., Cheng, Z., Miaoting, C., Poggio, J., & Dong, Y. (n.d.). Integrating Project-Based Learning with Self-Regulated Learning to Enhance Programming Learning Motivation. In Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (Vol. 41, Issue 2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Haatainen, O., & Aksela, M. (2021). Project-based learning in integrated science education: Active teachers’ perceptions and practices. LUMAT, 9(1), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Holmes, V.-L., & Hwang, Y. (2016). Exploring the effects of project-based learning in secondary mathematics education. Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.979911 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Jailani, u., Retnawati, H., Rafi, I., Mahmudi, A., Arliani, E., Zulnaidi, H., Hamid, H. S. A., & Prayitno, H. J. (2023). A phenomenological study of challenges that prospective mathematics teachers face in developing mathematical problems that require higher-order thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13631 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Lavado-Anguera, S., Terrón-López, M.-J., & Velasco-Quintana, P. J. (2025). Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Pathway to Effective PBL. International Journal of Engineering Education, 41(6), 1447–1461. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105021875814&partnerID=40&md5=ce5580e1653dfb5d1a935376945761ab [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Lee, Y.-J. (2022). Promoting social and emotional learning competencies in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics project-based mathematics classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 122(8), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Muzakkir, n., Rauf, R. A. A., & Zulnaidi, H. (2024). Development and validation of the Quran – Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, And Mathematics (Q-STEAM) module. STEM Education, 4(4), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Nasution, E. Y. P., Yulia, P., & Deswita, R. (2025). A modified project-based learning model to promote students’ creative thinking ability. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(2), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202530694 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Nurin, N. S., Junaedi, I., & Cahyono, A. N. (2024). Learning Numeracy around School Environment Supported by Mobile Math Trails using Problem-Based Learning Model. Mathematics Education Journal, 18(3), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v18i3.pp485-498 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Pham, C. X., Nguyen, H. T. M., Nguyen, G. T. C., Thai, L. T. H., & Truong, D. T. (2025). Critical factors shaping project-based learning in mathematics education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(6), 4540–4554. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i6.35671 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Ranmechai, S., & Poonputta, A. (2023). Problem-Based Learning Approach for Developing Learning Management Skills in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.9.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Rozhkova, S. V, Ustinova, I. G., Yanuschik, O. V, & Korytov, I. V. (2020). The use of the project-based learning in the study of the course of mathematical analysis. In A. M.E., H. H., & S. P. (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing: Vol. 1134 AISC (pp. 871–879). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40274-7_85 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Saparbayeva, E., Abdualiyeva, M., Torebek, Y., Kostangeldinova, A., Tursynbayev, A., Takibayeva, G., & Sabalakhova, A. (2025). Transforming mathematics education in Kazakhstan: evaluating the impact of innovative teaching methods on student outcomes in technical universities. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2461978 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Setiyani, S., Waluya, S. B., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Cahyono, A. N., & Santi, D. P. D. (2024). Assessing numeracy skills on flat shapes and scaffolding forms in junior high school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(1), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Sheikh, M., Fulbright, M., & Hademenos, G. (2011). Captain R. Rubber Ducky: A STEM driven project in aquatic robotics. Physics Teacher, 49(9), 557–559. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3661101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Shpeizer, R. (2019). Towards a successful integration of project-based learning in higher education: Challenges, technologies and methods of implementation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(8), 1765–1771. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070815 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Sumarno, W. K., Riyantoko, P. A., & Shodikin, A. (2024). Effectiveness of Bilingual Project-Based Materials to Facilitate Literacy and Numeracy Teaching. TEM Journal, 13(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM131-07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Uyangör, S. M. (2012). The effect of project-based learning on teaching of polygon and plane geometry unit. New Educational Review, 29(3), 212–226. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84961239349&partnerID=40&md5=db798333f88a5ed11b217a4210a87c77 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Wang, J., & Somasundram, P. (2025). Effect of STEM-PBL advanced mathematics course on engineering students’ problem-solving ability in higher vocational college. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1628482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Winarni, S., Kamid, K., Marzal, J., & Asrial, A. (2025). Numeracy skill development in prospective mathematics teachers: Challenges and opportunities in real-world contexts. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i1.pp91-110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Zakaria, M. I., Nasran, N. A. H. N., Abdullah, A. H., Alhassora, N. S. A., Pairan, R., & Yanuarto, W. N. (2024). Unlocking the Future: Mathematics Teachers’ Insight into Combination of M-Learning with Problem-Based Learning Teaching Activities. In Mathematics Teaching Research Journal (Vol. 16, Issue 3, pp. 196–216). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Zetriuslita, Ariawan, R., Suripah, Yulianti, A., & Hidayat, R. (n.d.). Using Problem-Based Learning-Autograph to Improve the Critical Thinking-Numeracy Ability: A Mixed Method Study in an Integral Calculus Course. In Educational Process: International Journal (Vol. 17). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study