Pseudo-Satisfaction in the Digital Era: Unmasking Gratitude Bias and Intermediated Bureaucracy in Public Service Transformation

Authors

Dede Syahril Sidik

Universitas Galuh, Ciamis, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Ginanjar Wira Saputra

Universitas Galuh, Ciamis, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Ally Mom

Pemerintahan Port Moresby, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea (Papua New Guinea)

Kurniawati

Universitas Langlangbuana, Bandung, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700696

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 10238-10245

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-31

Accepted: 2026-07-05

Published: 2026-08-11

Abstract

This study investigates the paradox of digital governance in West Bandung Regency, Indonesia, where a high Community Satisfaction Index (CSI) regarding a digital population administration application (SIDILAN) contradicts the low rate of independent digital adoption by citizens. Utilizing a Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory design with a focus on an Intrinsic Case Study in the qualitative phase, data were collected through semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and document triangulation. Participants were purposively selected, involving regency-level regulators, village officials, and end-users in areas with limited connectivity (blank spots). The data analysis reveals that the high CSI score is fundamentally a “pseudo-satisfaction” driven by the phenomenon of gratitude bias. Citizens essentially give high ratings as an appreciation for the personal assistance provided by village officials, rather than the reliability of the application system. The main findings highlight the role of village officials as “Digital Navigators” who sacrifice their personal time and resources (invisible labor) through benevolent discretion to patch the failures of digital infrastructure. This research contributes to expanding the Digital Era Governance literature by asserting that digital adoption in developing countries is not linear; instead, it breeds the concept of Intermediated E-Government. Practically and in terms of policy, this study urges the government to abandon artificial evaluation metrics and immediately adopt a Hybrid Proactive Governance Model by institutionalizing the role of digital navigators at the village level. Future research is recommended to quantitatively test the gratitude bias variable in a comparative context between urban and rural communities.

Keywords

Digital Governance, Digital Navigator, E-Government, Gratitude Bias, Pseudo-Satisfaction

Downloads

References

1. Saputra GW, Santosa P. Improving The Quality Of Public Services Through E-Government Implementation: A Case Study Of The Public Complaint Services Section Of The Civil Servants Police Unit (Satpol PP) Of Bandung City. In: Proceeding International Conference On Sustainable Environment And Innovation (ICOSEI). Universitas Al-Ghifari; 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Sitorus RV, Aisyah D, Saraan MIK. PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY IN THE AGE OF DIGITALIZATION: CHALLENGES, ADAPTATION, AND INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSES. OPINIJournal Commun Soc Sci. 2025;2(3):283–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Destriana WH, Sugandi YS, Saputra GW. Pengaruh Implementasi Kebijakan E-Government Dan Tata Kelola Pemerintah Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Garut. ALIGNMENTJournal Adm Educ Manag. 2023;6(2):303–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Safira N, Hanan H. The Paradox of E-Office Adoption in Indonesian Public Service with 24.000 Apps: Innovation or Prestige? J Sos Hum. 2024 Dec 31;17(2):192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Noor I, Ferdhianza HJ, Regina DS, Indrayanti AP, Maulana SW, Aprilia END. Beyond Digital Efficiency: Reconstructing Public Value Through Citizen Satisfaction in Adaptive Governance. Spirit Publik J Adm Publik. 2026;21(1):1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dewi TG, Saputra GW, Istikomah. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Kartu Keluarga dan Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat di Kecamatan Cimahi Tengah. J Ilm Univ Batanghari Jambi. 2024;24(1):75–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Latip, Mirza D, Lastri N, Aditiya V. Optimizing Digital Public Services for Enhanced Citizen Satisfaction and Transparent Governance. J Ilm Manaj Kesatuan. 2025 Nov 30;13(6):4563–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Wahyudi S, Yusup A, Perdana MR. Analysis of digital transformation of public administration in improving the effectiveness of government services in Indonesia. J Konseling Dan Pendidik. 2025;13(3):574–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Marienfeldt J. Serving a greater purpose: public servants’ views on meaningful digitalization and automation in street-level bureaucracies. Public Manag Rev. 2025 Oct 29;1–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Selten F, Robeer M, Grimmelikhuijsen S. ‘Just like I thought’: Street‐level bureaucrats trust AI recommendations if they confirm their professional judgment. Public Adm Rev. 2023 Mar 22;83(2):263–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Afrizal M, Djumiarti T. ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR IMPLEMENTASI E-GOVERNMENT KOTA TANGERANG SELATAN MELALUI RUMAH DUKCAPIL. Nov IDEA. 2026;2(3):1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Haryaningsih S, Yohanes Y, Andriani FD, Elyta. Evaluation Of The Implementation Of The SELEDRI Policy Towards E-Government. Int J Artif Intelegence Res. 2023;7(1.1):1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Saputra GW, Suarha C, Triadi R, Sarihati T. Innovation Of Death Certificate Services At The Department Of Population And Civil Registration Of Bandung City , West Java. Proc Int Conf Soc Polit Adm Commun Sci. 2024;1(2):138–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wilson-Menzfeld G, Erfani G, Young-Murphy L, Charlton W, De Luca H, Brittain K, et al. Identifying and understanding digital exclusion: a mixed-methods study. Behav Inf Technol. 2025 May 9;44(8):1649–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sharma A, Boyd S, Bonar EE. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Motivational Interviewing–Based Telehealth Intervention for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening: Protocol for a Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 29;13:e64433. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sayani S, Jabeen F, Samnani S, Muqeet A, Khan A, Delawar G, et al. Enablers, Challenges, and Lessons Learned From a Digital Health Intervention (Sehatmandi App) in Afghanistan: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2025 Nov 7;27:e74923. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Gupta R. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: a relational, recursive and reductive (3R) approach. Qual Res J. 2025 Apr 25; [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nasution MS, Syahza A, Rusli Z, Mayarni M, Mashur D, Zulkarnaini Z, et al. Public administration in the era of digital and collaborative governance: a bibliometric analysis. Otoritas J Ilmu Pemerintah. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):121–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles