Qualitative Mindset behind Grounded Theory: Implications to Qualitative Research Training

This paper investigated the essential link between developing a qualitative mindset and the successful use of Grounded Theory (GT). While traditional academic training often prioritizes data-heavy, positivist methods, this study argues that a qualitative mindset is a functional requirement for building abstract theories. This mindset consists of five core areas: awareness of how knowledge is created, self-reflection, sensitivity to social context, flexible methods, and analytical rigor. By synthesizing the history of GT across three generations—Classic, Straussian, and Constructivist—the research shows how these approaches are used in fields like Nursing, Business, and Education. The findings demonstrate how specific tools like memo-writing and constant comparison turn philosophical ideas into a rigorous research process. Finally, the paper suggests a teaching path that moves from basic observation in early education to advanced theorizing at the graduate level.

Grounded Theory, Qualitative Mindset, Research Pedagogy, Constructivism

1. Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s positionality and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2023). Grounded theory: A practical guide (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bryant, A. (2017). Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in digital working environments. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cooper, R., Fleischer, A., & Cotton, F. (2021). Building a qualitative research identity: Challenges and opportunities for novice researchers. Qualitative Research Journal, 21(3), 280–292. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Heeks, R. (2017). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016). A visual inventory for Instagram: Digital methods, visual networks, and the politics of segmentation. International Journal of Communication, 10, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2018). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 108–150). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0). Association of Internet Researchers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Morse, J. M., Bowers, B. J., Charmaz, K., Clarke, A. E., Corbin, J., Porr, C. J., & Stern, P. N. (2021). Developing grounded theory: The second generation revisited (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nelson, L. K. (2020). Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 3–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pratt, M. G., Kaplan, S., & Whittington, R. (2020). Editorial essay: The art and science of theorizing in organization studies. Organization Science, 31(1), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2021). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Steger, M. B. (2008). The rise of the global imaginary: Political ideologies from the French Revolution to the Global War on Terror. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study