Readiness of Metaverse Application for Teaching & Learning in Higher Education

Authors

Iqbal Hakim Mohd Ab Ghani

Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Azhar Abd Aziz

Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Afiza Ismail

Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0771

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/26 | Page No: 10077-10085

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-20

Accepted: 2025-12-26

Published: 2026-01-03

Abstract

The rapid advancement of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and related technologies has catalysed the emergence of the metaverse as a promising environment for transforming teaching and learning. Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET), with its strong emphasis on hands-on and practice-oriented learning, is particularly well-positioned to benefit from immersive, interactive technologies. However, in Malaysia, little is known about how ready TVET educators are to adopt metaverse-related applications in their teaching, and what conditions would support or hinder such adoption. This study explores the readiness of metaverse-related applications for teaching and learning in Malaysian higher TVET education from the perspective of educators. A qualitative research design grounded in an interpretivist paradigm was employed. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with five TVET educators from higher TVET institutions in Central Peninsular Malaysia. The interview protocol was adapted from prior work and conceptually structured using the Lokman Emotion and Importance Quadrant (LEIQ™) and the Technology Adoption Life Cycle (TALC) theories. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data, leading to nine key themes grouped into four strategic clusters: assessing readiness for adoption, addressing challenges, leveraging enablers, and articulating a vision for future integration. The findings indicate that educators exhibit positive attitudes towards technology, perceive strong institutional support, and have access to basic technical infrastructure, suggesting conceptual readiness to adopt metaverse applications. Nevertheless, significant cost barriers and technical issues—such as hardware availability, scalability, maintenance, and connectivity—remain critical constraints. Training opportunities, institutional initiatives, and collaboration with industry emerged as powerful enablers. The analysis further suggests that metaverse adoption in Malaysian TVET currently lies in the “chasm” between early adopters and the early majority. The study concludes that strategic planning, sustained investment, and systematic capacity-building are essential to move metaverse applications from promising pilots to mainstream practice in TVET education.

Keywords

Metaverse, TVET, LEIQ™

Downloads

References

1. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., et al. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice, and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). The metaverse in education: Definition, framework, features, potential applications, challenges, and future research topics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1016300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Carpenter, R. E., McWhorter, R., & Stone, K. (2023). Adopting virtual reality for education: Exploring teachers’ perspectives on readiness, opportunities, and challenges. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 112345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gamage, K. A. A., Wijesuriya, D. I., Ekanayake, S. Y., Rennie, A. E. W., Lambert, C. G., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery of teaching and laboratory practices: Continuity of university programmes during COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(10), 291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lokman, A., Abd Kadir, S., Hamidi, S., & Mohamed Shuhidan, S. (2019). LEIQ™ as an emotion and importance model for QoL: Fundamentals and case studies. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(2), 412–430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ng, D. T. K. (2022). What is the metaverse? Definitions, technologies and the community of inquiry. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 190–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Uddin, M., Manickam, S., Ullah, H., Obaidat, M., & Dandoush, A. (2023). Unveiling the metaverse: Exploring emerging trends, multifaceted perspectives, and future challenges. IEEE Access, 11, 12345–12360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Xi, N., Chen, J., Gama, F., Riar, M., & Hamari, J. (2022). The challenges of entering the metaverse: An experiment on the effect of extended reality on workload. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(2), 659–680. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles