Reality Check: Exposure to Hyper-Realistic AI-Generated Content and Its Relationship on Media Literacy Among Computer Engineering Students of Bulacan State University

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been developing in several ways that can generate new content, which has an impact on the media industry and the community. This study uses a quantitative research approach, which aims to determine the relationship between levels of exposure to hyper-realistic AI-generated content and levels of media literacy of computer engineering students at Bulacan State University. A total of 40 respondents answered the validated online questionnaire, containing the demographic profile, assessment of AI exposure, and an evaluation of media literacy using Likert scales and a human-AI identification test. The collected data were gathered using frequency distribution, weighted mean, standard deviation, and Spearman’s rho correlation at a 0.05 significance level. The results revealed that students often encountered hyper-realistic AI-generated content (overall weighted mean = 4.07). The respondents reported that they often encountered the diversion of AI formats (overall weighted mean = 4.12). The students highly understand the concept of AI-generated content and how to use it in other ways (overall weighted mean = 4.66). They also have a high sense of digital responsibility in determining the authenticated content across social media platforms (overall weighted mean = 4.54). Spearman’s rho indicated a weak relationship (ρ = 0.299) between exposure to hyper-realistic AI-generated content and media literacy. Their relationship is not statistically significant (ρ = 0.061). This research concluded that the digital experiences of the respondents are part of their everyday lives, revealing that they are frequently exposed to AI-generated images, videos, and music. This also fosters the media analytical and technical skills development. The findings revealed that the computer engineering students have a high level of media literacy as they can recognize algorithmic patterns and validate sources effectively.

hyper-realistic AI, media literacy, AI-generated content, AI exposure

1. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/research-design-6-270550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chua, K. R., Masangkay, M. C., & Mayo, A. (2024). Implications of deepfake to Laguna University students’ trust in media. Quest Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering Research (JECER), 10(5), 09–15. https://www.questjournals.org/jecer/papers/vol10-issue5/10050915.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. John Wiley. http://andrei.gorea.free.fr/Teaching_fichiers/SDT%20and%20Psytchophysics.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hwang, Y., Ryu, J. Y., & Jeong, S.‑H. (2021). Effects of disinformation using deepfake: The protective effect of media literacy education. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(3), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Labide, P. J. L., Prado, M. C., Lumbre, R. M. B., Sunga, C. M. J., & Uy, F. O. P. (2025). Digital media literacy in the age of misinformation: Responding to deepfakes. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(12). https://cognizancejournal.com/vol5issue12/V5I1227.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. McCombes, S. (2023, June 22). Descriptive research: Definition, types, methods & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. McLeod, S. (2019). Qualitative vs. quantitative research: What’s the difference? Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/qualitative-quantitative.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Skinner, H. E., & Giesbrecht, B. (2025). Beyond detection rate: Understanding the vigilance decrement using signal detection theory. Frontiers in Cognition, 3, Article 1505046. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2024.1505046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Wu, H. (2025). Assessing Students’ ability to Identify AI-Generated Images: A Two-Dimensional study of realistic and artistic content. Proceedings, 75–77. https://doi.org/10.54808/icsit2025.01.75 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Library Services in Nairobi: Ethical Implications and Future Trends in User Interaction
• ESPYREAL: A Mobile Based Multi-Currency Identifier for Visually Impaired Individuals Using Convolutional Neural Network
• Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven IoT-Based Smart Agriculture Platforms with Blockchain-Enabled Marketplaces
• AI-Based Dish Recommender System for Reducing Fruit Waste through Spoilage Detection and Ripeness Assessment
• SEA-TALK: An AI-Powered Voice Translator and Southeast Asian Dialects Recognition