Reclaiming the Mandate: A Critical Policy Analysis of Change Management in Morocco's "New School" Reform
Authors
Faculty of Letters, Languages and Arts, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra (Morocco)
Faculty of Letters, Languages and Arts, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra (Morocco)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0415
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 5662-5667
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-18
Accepted: 2026-06-24
Published: 2026-07-07
Abstract
This paper presents a critical policy analysis of the persistent implementation in national educational reforms, specifically examining the "New School" project within the context of the Strategic Vision 2015-2030 and Framework Law 51-17. Despite theoretical frameworks, a stark paradox remains: the political actors tasked with designing reform frequently serve as structural barriers to its implementation in the field. This study evaluates the temporal, financial, and ideological dimensions of educational policy through the lens of change management. The analysis identifies four primary impediments to quality reform: profound governance discrepancies between allocated resources and actual competencies achieved, a systemic "culture of rupture" that undermines institutional continuity, the politicisation of educational arenas for partisan gain, and a structural misalignment with labour market needs and civic values. Ultimately, the paper argues that resolving this paradox requires transitioning from fragmented, short-term political manoeuvring to a robust, sustainable societal contract. Recognising the mandate of the New School and preparing it for rapid global transformations, including Artificial Intelligence, requires transparent governance, active integration with civil society, and a participatory approach that aligns political discourse with educational reality.
Keywords
Educational Reform Policy, Implementation, Governance
Downloads
References
1. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. National Bureau of Economic Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Court of Accounts. (2018). Annual report on the audit of the educational sector. Kingdom of Morocco. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Diem, S., Young, M. D., Welton, A. D., Mansfield, K. C., & Lee, P. L. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068–1090. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. High Commission for Planning [HCP]. (2022). National demographic and employment surveys: Annual report*. Kingdom of Morocco. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Higher Council for Education, Training and Scientific Research [CSEFRS]. (2015). Strategic vision of reform 2015–2030: For a school of equity, quality and promotion*. Kingdom of Morocco. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Higher Council for Education, Training and Scientific Research [CSEFRS]. (2021). National programme for the assessment of educational achievements (PNEA). Kingdom of Morocco. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Honig, M. I. (Ed.). (2006). New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity. State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Jimma, T., & Tarekegn, W. (2016). The Prevailing Practices and Challenges of Curriculum Reform in Ethiopian Higher Education: Views and Responses from Within. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 87–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kingdom of Morocco. (2019). Framework Law No. 51-17 relating to the system of education, training and scientific research. Official Bulletin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kraft, M. A., & Novicoff, S. (2024). Time in School: A Conceptual Framework, Synthesis of the Causal Research, and Empirical Exploration. American Educational Research Journal, 61, 724–766. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Priestley, M., & Miller, K. (2012). Educational change in Scotland: policy, context and biography. The Curriculum Journal, 23, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study