Redefining Civic Responsibility as Scientific Leadership: The CADP Civic Education Model

Civic responsibility in Africa has historically been conceived through the moral and political frameworks of participatory democracy, legal consciousness, and community ethics. However, the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) demands a radical reimagination of what it means to be a civic actor on the African continent. The emerging paradigm, represented by the Child-Author Development Programme (CADP), positions scientific literacy and technological creativity as essential civic competences. This reconceptualization transforms civic engagement into a domain of scientific problem-solving, technological stewardship, and knowledge-based innovation. Within this framework, civic virtue is no longer measured solely by one’s political participation but by one’s capacity to produce knowledge, innovate technologies, and mobilize science for social transformation. This paper advances a theoretical expansion of civic responsibility through the lens of Science, Technology, and Society (STS) studies, proposing Scientific Leadership as a new civic identity for Africa’s emerging citizens. It analyzes the CADP model as a decolonial civic pedagogy that unites African Science Fiction, technological nationalism, and civic education to cultivate scientific consciousness in children and adolescents. By situating CADP within Africa’s epistemic struggle for technological independence, the paper argues that civic education must evolve beyond governance instruction to become an intellectual infrastructure for Africa’s scientific sovereignty. In redefining civic responsibility as scientific leadership, CADP models an indigenous civic-educational framework for Africa’s 21st-century renaissance.

Scientific Leadership, Civic Responsibility, Child-Author

1. Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future matters: Action, knowledge, ethics. Brill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adeyemi, K., & Salawudeen, M. (2014). Civic education and political participation in Africa: A case study of Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(6), 45-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adeyemi, M. B., & Adeyinka, A. A. (2003). The principles and content of African traditional education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(4), 425–440. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. African Union. (2015). Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want. Addis Ababa: African Union Commission. https://au.int/en/agenda2063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. African Union. (2021). Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy for Africa 2024 (STISA-2024). Addis Ababa: African Union Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ake, C. (1996). Democracy and development in Africa. Brookings Institution Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Alatas, S. F. (2000). Intellectual imperialism: Definition, traits, and problems. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 28(1), 23–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Archer, L., et al. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 881–908. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2010). Weak knowledge demand in the South. Science and Public Policy, 37(8), 571–582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Barben, D., et al. (2008). Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology. In The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed.). MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (2012). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Anniversary ed.). MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Boon, M. (2020). Science, technology, and civic responsibility in Africa: Policy perspectives for the 21st century. Journal of African Studies and Development, 12(3), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.5897/JASD2020.0132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cerdeira, L., Cabrito, B., & Sarrico, C. (2023). Research and innovation in African universities: Trends and policy challenges. Higher Education Policy, 36(2), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-022-00268-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (2012). Theory from the South: Or, how Euro-America is evolving toward Africa. Paradigm Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Diop, C. A. (1987). Precolonial Black Africa. Lawrence Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Egan, K. (2008). The future of education: Reimagining our schools from the ground up. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Eshun, K. (2003). Further considerations on Afrofuturism. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(2), 287–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Eze, C. (2019). Technological literacy and national development in Africa: The role of science education in civic responsibility. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 11(4), 467-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2019.1581245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation (3rd ed.). MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership. Harvard Business Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Honwana, A. (2012). The time of youth: Work, social change, and politics in Africa. Kumarian Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Hountondji, P. J. (1997). Endogenous Knowledge: Research Trajectories. CODESRIA Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. InterAcademy Partnership (IAP). (2021). Improving Scientific Input to Global Policymaking: Policy for Science and Science for Policy. Trieste, Italy: IAP Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. International Network for Government Science Advice (INGSA). (2018). Building Science Advice Capacity in Africa: Regional Report 2018. Montreal, Canada: INGSA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Isin, E. F. (2008). Acts of citizenship. Zed Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Isin, E. F., & Ruppert, E. (2015). Being digital citizens. Rowman & Littlefield. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Jasanoff, S. (2011). Reframing rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the genetic age. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kerr, D. (2003). Citizenship education in England: The making of a new subject. Department for Education and Skills. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Maldonado-Torres, N. (2011). Thinking through the decolonial turn: Post-continental interventions in theory, philosophy, and critique. Transmodernity, 1(2), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Mkandawire, T. (2005). Maladjusted African economies and globalisation. Africa Development, 30(1–2), 1–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Mkandawire, T. (2014). Neopatrimonialism and the political economy of economic performance in Africa. World Politics, 67(3), 563–612. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Mtwisha, L., Singh, N., & Mouton, J. (2021). Research leadership and capacity building in African universities: Challenges and strategies. South African Journal of Higher Education, 35(2), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.20853/35-2-4697 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Neaves, L., Juma, N., & de Vries, H. (2021). Strengthening African Science Systems: Leadership, Strategy and Coordination. Science and Development Network Policy Brief. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Nwosu, T. I. (2021). African Science Fiction and Technological Nationalism: redefining civic engagement through scientific literacy. The African Science Fiction Project Internal Working Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2012). Blinded by sight: Divining the future of anthropology in Africa. Africa Spectrum, 47(2–3), 63–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2017). Incompleteness: Frontiers of mobility and epistemology in Africa. Africa Development, 42(2), 7-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. OECD. (2021). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2021: Times of Crisis and Opportunity. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/75f79015-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Ogunleye, F. (2018). Education and technological empowerment in Africa: Bridging the civic and scientific divide. Journal of African Education and Development Studies, 15(2), 77-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Okafor, L. (2016). Civic engagement and governance in Africa: Rethinking policy frameworks for the digital age. African Governance Review, 9(1), 33-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Okeke, J. (2017). Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Scientific Leadership: A Framework for Civic Education in Africa. Ibadan: University of Ibadan Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Okorafor, N. (2016). Africanfuturism defined. (Essay/critical work). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Partnership for African Social and Governance Research (PASGR). (2013). African Research and Policy Capacity: Strengthening Institutions for Evidence-Informed Governance. Nairobi: PASGR Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L’Ouverture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Continuum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. J., & Wilsdon, J. (2014). Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513518154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Sweeney, J. A. (2012). Science fiction as a tool for future studies. Futures, 44(6), 560–567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71(2), 303-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1658-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. UNESCO. (2022). UNESCO Science Report 2021: The Race Against Time for Smarter Development. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. World Bank. (2020). World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. Washington DC: World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
• Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
• Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
• Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
• Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study