Reframing Functional Literacy Instruction: A Case Study of Teaching Strategies for Learners with Atypical Language Development
Authors
PhDAL Candidate, University of the Immaculate Conception, Davao City (Philippines)
Professor, University of the Immaculate Conception, Davao City (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400014
Subject Category: Linguistics
Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 213-226
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-09
Accepted: 2026-04-14
Published: 2026-04-24
Abstract
Effective functional literacy instruction for learners with atypical language development is strengthened by deliberately integrating core teaching strategies that enhance accessibility, engagement, and meaningful learning outcomes. Employing a qualitative single case study design, this study explored the practices of five purposively selected special education teachers from Central Elementary School Special Education Centers in the Davao Region, with five master teachers serving as key informants for triangulation. Data gathered through in-depth and key informant interviews revealed that teachers consistently implement essential strategies, including multisensory, scaffolded, differentiated, communication-oriented, and functional curriculum-based instruction. These findings underscore that effective functional literacy instruction is grounded in the consistent and purposeful application of these core strategies, enabling more responsive, inclusive, and meaningful learning experiences for learners with atypical language development.
Keywords
teaching strategies, functional literacy
Downloads
References
1. Allam, F. C., & Martin, M. M. (2021). Issues and challenges in special education: A qualitative analysis from a teacher's perspective. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 10(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol10.1.4.2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Amaliyah, R., & Frety, E. E. (2023). Strategi Penanganan Speech Delay pada Anak: Literatur Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 23(2), 1665. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v23i2.3569 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Anuar, N. L. A., & Muhamad, N. (2025). Multisensory approach in quranic literacy for dyslexia learners: A systematic review. International Journal of Modern Education, 7(28), 682. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijmoe.728048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Baker, J. N., Rivera, C., Devine, S., & Mason, L. (2018). Teaching emergent literacy skills to students with autism spectrum disorder. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(3), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218767907 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bakhytzhamal, S., Dinara, Y., & Gao, C. (2026). Social and pedagogical support for children with special educational needs: A systematic review of inclusive practices, instructional strategies and support measures in mainstream schools. European Journal of Education, 61(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bañados, M. R. L., Sulfelix, J. N. S., Baste, J. D., Gatus, J. T. C., Van P Rafanan, R., & Cagape, W. E. (2024). Innovative teaching approaches of teachers in teaching students with special needs: A case study. International Journal of Research Publications, 146(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001461420246284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Biggs, E. E., Arserio, A. P., Robison, S. E., & Ross, M. E. (2023). Home literacy environment and interventions for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A scoping review. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 66(6), 2118–2140. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_jslhr-22-00334 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Carreon, M., Bagcal, B., Bakiao, G., Lanticse, M. J., Pabon, R., & Huliganga, H. J. (2025). Speaking to learn, learning to speak: A case study on teaching approaches for learners with language learning disabilities. Psychology and Education a Multidisciplinary Journal, 34(6), 661–672. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.340602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://l1nk.dev/jkJDG [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Department of Education. (2019). DepEd Order No. 021, s. 2019: Policy guidelines on the K to 12 basic education program.https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/DO_s2019_021.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Department of Education. (2022). DepEd Order No. 023, s. 2022: Guidelines on the implementation of the Child Find system in basic education. https://depedph.com/deped-order-23/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Department of Education. (2021). DepEd Order No. 44, s. 2021: Policy guidelines on the provision of educational programs and services for learners with disabilities in the K to 12 basic education program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/DO_s2021_044.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Denzin, N. K. (2017). The Research Act. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Diron, A., & Baldonado, C. (2025). Differentiated instruction on improving the reading comprehension of Grade three learners. Psychology and Education a Multidisciplinary Journal, 46(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.460206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Elkot, M. A., Youssif, E., Hago Elmahdi, O. E., AbdAlgane, M., & Ali, R. (2025). Generative conversational AI: Active practices for fostering students with mild intellectual disabilities to improve English communication skills. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1), ep549. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Gadiraju, V., Jayne, L., & Kane, S. K. (2024). “It’s an independent living skill but covered with fun!”: Prompting at-home skill development for children with vision impairment. ASSETS ’24: The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3663548.3675626 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Factor, S. D., & Saenz, C. R. (2025). Barriers and enablers of inclusive education for learners with disabilities: The case of Philippine primary schools. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(VIII), 1925–1942. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.908000158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Lasintia, M., Prihantoro, P., Edy, S., & Ariani, D. (2021). English language teaching strategy for ASD (autism spectrum disorder) students. Linguists Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 7(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.29300/ling.v7i1.4247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Maysuroh, S., Dwimaulani, A., Wati, L., Nurhayati, N., & Yusri, N. (2024). Teaching English to students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Journey Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 7(1), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v7i1.863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Miles, D. A. (2017, August). A taxonomy of research gaps: Identifying and defining the seven research gaps. In Doctoral student workshop: finding research gaps-research methods and strategies, Dallas, Texas (Vol. 1, pp. 1-10). https://tinyurl.com/vm9ba496 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Montales, C. L. (2026). Assessing inclusive education needs and challenges in teaching LSEN in the Philippines. Journal of Innovative Research, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.54536/jir.v4i1.5091 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Munni, M. A. (2025). Second/foreign language learning challenges in learners with communication disorders: Exploring inclusive pedagogical approaches. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(10), 3291–3294. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Narvacan, M. J. (2025). Exploring the readiness of teachers and parents in supporting inclusive education for students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Research Publications. https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001751620258278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Nurjanah, Kansil, I. C., Masturoh, I., & Hanwar, D. (2024). Multisensory learning: improving conceptual understanding through an intuitive sensory approach. Journal of Pedagogi, 1(6), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.62872/7ygyx095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Oyan, N. J. G., Alas, N. A. F. D., & Bautista, N. J. A. L. (2024). Lived experiences of teachers using adaptive strategies in teaching ASD learners: a phenomenological study. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra16837 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Rance, M. S. (2025). Teaching strategies for learners with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the Division of Davao del Norte: Basis for training plan. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(7), 288–308. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i72123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Republic of the Philippines. (2022). Republic Act No. 11650: An Act instituting a policy of inclusion and services for learners with disabilities in support of inclusive education. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2022/03/11/republic-act-no-11650/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Republic of the Philippines. (2012). Republic Act No. 10173: Data Privacy Act of 2012. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Roberts, C. A., Wilhelm, A., Allred, B., & Hudson, R. F. (2025). Expanding literacy: caregiver experiences with literacy engagement for their children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 91(3), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029251317014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Sabih, I.S., Kuyini, A. (2025). Memory enhancing strategies to support learning and cognitive functioning in students with neurodevelopmental disorders. In: Al Marri, K., Mir, F.A., Awad, A., Abubakar, A. (eds) BUiD Doctoral Research Conference 2024. BDRC 2024. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 587. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84371-6_25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Salehomoum, M. (2019). Scaffolding development of self-regulated and strategic literacy skills in deaf or hard-of-hearing students: A review of the literature through the lens of the gradual release of responsibility model. The Gradual Release of Responsibility in Literacy Research and Practice.https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-045820190000010010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Seidman, I. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research. (n.d.). Teachers College Press. https://www.tcpress.com/products/interviewing-as-qualitative-research_9780807761489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Senan, N., Aziz, W. A. W. A., Othman, M. F., & Suparjoh, S. (2017). Embedding repetition (Takrir) technique in developing Al-Quran memorizing mobile application for autism children. MATEC Web of Conferences, 135, 00076. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713500076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Sulse, L., & Hilario, M. G. (2024). A phenomenological study on the lived experiences of selected Filipino deaf educators regarding inclusive education in the Philippines. Academia Lasalliana Journal of Education and Humanities, 6(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.55902/sadu4070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Swanson, H. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1207/sldrp1403_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Ustinovskaya, A. A. (2024). Challenges in the methodological training of future foreign language teachers for inclusive education. Pedagogy Theory & Practice, 9(10), 959–965. https://doi.org/10.30853/ped20240121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Wallace, M. T., Woynaroski, T. G., & Stevenson, R. A. (2019). Multisensory integration as a window into orderly and disrupted cognition and communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Yunani, N., Mustadi, A., Mumpuniarti, M., Ishartiwi, I., & Hidayat, R. (2024). Differentiated instruction science learning for intellectually disabled pupils at an inclusive primary school: A case study. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(3), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Synonymy in the Songs of Ummaru Bagobiri: A Contextual Linguistics Analysis
- Aspect of Compounding and Affixation in Bassa-Nge
- Kinayah (Metonymy) in Malay: An Analysis Based on the Science of Balaghah
- Optimality Theory: Application of Dahl’s law in Kindia
- Selling Diversity: The Politics of Representation in Global Advertising