Refugees Asylum Seekers with Disabilities in Zimbabwe: Structural Marginalisation, Policy Commitments, and the Imperative for Disability Inclusive Refugee Protection

Refugees and asylum seekers with disabilities occupy a profoundly marginal position within contemporary forced migration regimes, shaped by intersecting structures of displacement, disability, poverty, gender, and restrictive legal environments. In Zimbabwe, these vulnerabilities are intensified by an encampment based refugee policy, enduring economic precarity, and historically weak disability inclusion mechanisms. This article critically examines the status and experiences of refugees and asylum seekers with disabilities in Zimbabwe through a policy, law, practice analytical lens, interrogating the disconnect between normative commitments and lived realities. Anchored in international refugee and disability rights instruments, and national frameworks including Zimbabwe’s National Disability Policy (2021), the Persons with Disabilities Act (2025), and the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education’s Safeguarding, Gender Equity, Disability and Social Inclusion (GEDSI) Strategy, the article synthesises academic scholarship and institutional evidence to assess the extent to which these frameworks translate into meaningful inclusion. Drawing on Zimbabwean and African scholarship; particularly the works of Mandikiana, Mhlanga, Tarusarira, and others; alongside reports from UNHCR, IOM, UNICEF, Jesuit Refugee Service, Plan International, and Christian Blind Mission, the paper argues that refugee protection in Zimbabwe remains predominantly welfare oriented, fragmented, and insufficiently disability responsive. It contends that refugees with disabilities continue to be positioned as passive recipients of assistance rather than as rights holders and contributors to social development. The article concludes by calling for a paradigmatic shift toward rights based, disability inclusive, and development oriented refugee governance that embeds participation, accessibility, and intersectionality at the centre of refugee protection and national development planning.

refugees with disabilities; asylum seekers

1. African Legal Information Institute. (2025). Zimbabwe refugee law reader. AfricanLII. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bakewell, O. (2010). Some reflections on structure and agency in migration theory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1689–1708. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2010.489382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chikoko, W., Mhlanga, J., Matavire, P. C. J., & Mwapaura, K. (2024). Asylum seekers, refugees and social safety nets in Zimbabwe. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-XXXX-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chimni, B. S. (2009). The birth of a “discipline”: From refugee to forced migration studies. Journal of Refugee Studies, 22(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Christian Blind Mission. (2022). Disability inclusion in humanitarian action. CBM Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Education Development Trust. (2021). Inclusive education in conflict affected contexts. EDT. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Government of Zimbabwe. (2021). National disability policy. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. International Organization for Migration. (2022). Disability inclusion in migration governance. IOM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jesuit Refugee Service. (2022). Inclusion and protection of refugees with disabilities in Zimbabwe. JRS Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mandikiana, M. R. (2021). COVID 19 and its effects on refugee, asylum seeker, and migrant children at Tongogara Refugee Camp in Zimbabwe. Pan African Journal of Governance and Development, 2(2), 170–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mandikiana, M. R. (2023). Asylum, externalisation, and the threat of return to Rwanda. Journal of Forced Migration Studies, 6(1), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mandikiana, M. R. (2023). The Rwanda–United Kingdom refugees and asylum seeker deal: Absolved responsibility? International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VII(VI), 687–702. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7652 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mhlanga, J., & Zengeya, R. M. (2016). Social work with refugees in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Social Work, 6(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2025). Safeguarding, gender, equity, disability and social inclusion (GEDSI) strategy 2025–2030. Government of Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Plan International. (2023). Inclusive education and protection for refugee children with disabilities. Plan International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tarusarira, W. (2024). Disability and migration (Doctoral dissertation). Stellenbosch University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Think Equal. (2020). Inclusive early childhood education. Think Equal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2019). Need to know guidance: Working with persons with disabilities in forced displacement. UNHCR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2023). Global trends and protection needs of persons with disabilities. UNHCR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2024). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2023. UNHCR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. United Nations Children’s Fund. (2021). Seen, counted, included: Using data to shed light on the well being of children with disabilities. UNICEF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020). Disability inclusion in refugee education contexts. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Walton, E., Thondhlana, J., Monk, D., & Wedekind, V. (2024). Education for disabled refugees. Compare, 54(6), 965–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2023.XXXXXX [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. World Health Organization, & World Bank. (2022). Disability and displacement. WHO & World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Zimbabwe Legal Information Institute. (2026). Persons with Disabilities Act (Act No. 3 of 2025). ZimLII. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar