Regulatory and Policy Frameworks Supporting Digital-Era Foreign Policy in Kenya, 2020–2025

This study evaluates the effectiveness of Kenya's regulatory and policy frameworks in supporting digital-era foreign policy adaptation between 2020 and 2025. It examines the degree to which Kenya's digital governance legislation, ICT policies, and cybersecurity strategies are aligned with foreign policy objectives, adequately address digital risks in diplomatic operations, and are supported by functioning inter-agency coordination mechanisms. A mixed-methods cross-sectional design was adopted, combining structured questionnaires administered to 181 respondents from the Ministry of Foreign and Diaspora Affairs, selected diplomatic missions, the ICT Authority of Kenya, and the Ministry of Information, Communications and the Digital Economy, with 12 Key Informant Interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. Qualitative data were subjected to systematic thematic analysis. Findings reveal persistent regulatory inadequacy. A combined 43.6 percent rated existing digital policies as providing low or no support to foreign policy functions. All three Likert-scale regulatory framework indicators yielded means below the neutral midpoint (range: 2.12–2.21), with inter-agency coordination recording the highest combined disagreement rate across all nine study items at 83.9 percent. Correlation analysis established a positive and significant association between regulatory frameworks and foreign policy performance (r = .641, p = 0.000). Multiple regression identified regulatory frameworks as the second strongest predictor (B = 0.240, p = 0.000). This study provides empirical evidence that Kenya's digital governance legislation, while relatively well-developed, was designed for domestic governance rather than foreign policy integration, creating a systemic disconnect between regulatory design and diplomatic operational needs. It links regulatory fragmentation and absent inter-agency coordination mechanisms directly to reduced foreign policy performance. The Ministry of Foreign and Diaspora Affairs should develop a dedicated Digital Foreign Policy Framework providing explicit operational guidelines for diplomatic practice and formalize mandatory inter-agency coordination protocols through a Joint Digital Foreign Policy Committee with clear mandate, reporting structures, and accountability mechanisms.

The key terms identified from the study on Kenya's digital-era foreign policy adaptation include digital foreign policy, digital governance legislation, and inter-agency

1. African Union Commission. (2020). Digital transformation strategy for Africa (2020–2030). https://au.int/en/documents/20200518/digital-transformation-strategy-africa-2020-2030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect: How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Communications Authority of Kenya. (2023). Annual sector statistics report 2023. https://www.ca.go.ke [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. European Commission. (2021). Shaping Europe's digital future: Cybersecurity and data protection framework. https://commission.europa.eu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Government of Kenya. (2018). Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act, No. 5 of 2018. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Government of Kenya. (2019). Data Protection Act, No. 24 of 2019. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Government of Kenya. (2020). National ICT policy. Ministry of Information, Communications and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Government of Kenya. (2022). National cybersecurity strategy 2022–2027. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kansiime, F. (2021). Digital diplomacy and governance in East Africa: Evidence from Uganda and Rwanda. African Journal of Governance and Development, 10(2), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kiggundu, M. (2022). Digital governance and foreign policy integration in Africa. Journal of African Policy Studies, 9(1), 23–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ministry of Foreign and Diaspora Affairs. (2024). Kenya foreign policy 2024. https://www.mfa.go.ke [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mwangi, P. (2022). Digital transformation and foreign policy in Kenya. East African Journal of Diplomacy, 6(1), 55–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nye, J. S. (2011). The future of power. PublicAffairs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. OECD. (2021). The digital transformation of public diplomacy. https://www.oecd.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Otieno, J. (2021). ICT governance and policy development in Kenya: Progress and challenges. Journal of African Development Studies, 11(3), 98–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pamment, J. (2022). Digital diplomacy and foreign policy change. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Peters, B. G. (2012). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism (3rd ed.). Continuum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. UNCTAD. (2021). Digital economy report 2021: Cross-border data flows and development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2021_en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. World Bank. (2022). Digital development overview. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digitaldevelopment/overview [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar