Reimagining Gender-Inclusive Leadership: A Conceptual Analysis of Digital HRM Practices and Structural Barriers

Persistent gender disparities in leadership remain a critical global and national concern despite decades of policy interventions and organisational reform. Structural barriers embedded within recruitment, promotion, performance evaluation, and work-life systems continue to impede women’s upward mobility, particularly in regions such as Southeast Asia, where socio-cultural norms intensify workplace inequalities. In Malaysia, women remain underrepresented in senior and strategic leadership roles, signalling the need for transformative mechanisms that address organisational bias at a systemic level. This conceptual article examines how Digital Human Resource Management (Digital HRM) can serve as a strategic enabler to reduce gendered structural barriers and promote gender-inclusive leadership pathways. Adopting a conceptual methodology, the study synthesises international and Malaysian literature, integrates relevant theoretical perspectives, including structural barriers theory, gendered organisational theory, and digital transformation frameworks, and proposes a comprehensive conceptual model explaining the mechanisms through which Digital HRM can enhance women’s leadership outcomes. The analysis shows that digital recruitment systems, algorithmic decision-making, HR analytics, and digital performance management hold potential to mitigate bias by increasing transparency, standardising evaluation processes, and improving access to leadership development opportunities for women. Furthermore, digital work arrangements and virtual learning ecosystems can enhance leadership readiness and work-life integration. However, the article also underscores that digitalisation alone does not guarantee equity; without strong governance, algorithmic systems may replicate existing biases. The implications of this study extend to organisational policy, national HR governance, and gender-inclusive digital transformation strategies. This conceptual work offers theoretical contributions to the intersection of gender studies and digital HRM and provides a foundation for future empirical research examining digital enablers of women’s leadership advancement

Digital Human Resource Management (Digital HRM)

1. Ajunwa, I. (2020). The paradox of automation as anti-bias intervention. Cardozo Law Review, 41(4), 1671–1714. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandara, R. J., Biswas, K., Akter, S., Shafique, S., & Rahman, M. (2025). Addressing Algorithmic Bias in AI‐Driven HRM Systems: Implications for Strategic HRM Effectiveness. Human Resource Management Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bondarouk, T., & Brewster, C. (2016). Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(21), 2652–2671. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chung, H., & van der Horst, M. (2020). Flexible working and gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 495–527. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Clark, T., Foster, L., Bryman, A., & Sloan, L. (2021). Bryman's social research methods (6th ed.) Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Garcia, M. F., Ahmed, R., Flores, G. L., & Halliday, C. S. (2023). Gender equality and comparative HRM: A 40-year review. Human Resource Management Review, 33(4), 100972. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hashim, M., Azman, N., & Yusoff, N. (2022). Flexible work arrangements and women’s career sustainability in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(3), 285–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. International Labour Organization. (2022). Gender equality in digitalising economies: Policy perspectives for Asia and the Pacific. ILO Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Islam, M. A., Jantan, A. H., Hunt, A., Hashim, H., & Chong, C. W. (2022). Exploring barriers faced by women leaders in accessing and holding leadership positions in public universities in an emerging country. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 27(1), 121-142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ismail, M., & Ibrahim, S. (2020). Women’s leadership challenges in Malaysian organisations. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(7), 657–673. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. Guilford Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ladge, J., Humberd, B., & Baskerville Watkins, M. (2019). Updating the maternal wall: Women’s experiences navigating employment and leadership. Academy of Management Review, 44(1), 1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Marler, J. H., & Boudreau, J. W. (2017). An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 3-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mazlan, M., Asri, N. M., Chamhuri, N., & Al-Hadi, A. A. (2023). Working environment for women leadership in STEM. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 57(1), 207-218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Meijerink, J., Bondarouk, T., & Lepak, D. (2021). When HRM meets digital transformation. Human Resource Management Review, 31(3), 100785. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development. (2021). Policy on Women’s Empowerment in Malaysia. Government of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mujtaba, B.G. (2025). Human resource analytics and adverse impact assessment based on gender: A study on academic performance and workplace disparities. International Journal of Research in Human Resource Management 2025, 7(1), 321-331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). OECD principles on artificial intelligence. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Othman, N., Rahman, R. S. A. R. A., Abdullah, N., & Ramly, R. (2023). Female Leadership in Malaysia: Issues and Challenges. Asian Women, 39(1), 1-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual review of psychology, 63(1), 539-569. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rasdi, R. M., Hamzah, S. R. A., & Yean, T. F. (2020). Exploring self-leadership development of Malaysian women entrepreneurs. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 22(2), 189-200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Soleimani, M., Intezari, A., Arrowsmith, J., Pauleen, D. J., & Taskin, N. (2025). Reducing AI bias in recruitment and selection: an integrative grounded approach. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Stachová, K., Stacho, Z., Šamalík, P., & Sekan, F. (2024). The impact of E-HRM tools on employee engagement. Administrative Sciences, 14(11), 303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Strohmeier, S. (2020). Digital human resource management: A conceptual clarification. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(3), 345-365. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UN Women. (2022). Innovation and technology for gender equality: Policy strategies for digital inclusion. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Walkowiak, E. (2024). Digitalization and inclusiveness of HRM practices: The example of neurodiversity initiatives. Human Resource Management Journal, 34(3), 578-598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Is Strike Relevant in the Modern Era? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing, IT/Ites, FMCG, Electronics and Emerging Sectors
• A Qualitative Exploration of Work-Life Balance Among Private Universities Lecturers in Klang Valley
• Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover
• Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Practices: A Structural Equation Model on Service Orientation among Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation in Davao Region
• Cost of Silence: Exploring the Impact of Organisational Silence on Employee Engagement