Relationships among Teaching, Social, and Cognitive Presence in Online Learning
Authors
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)
Department of General Studies Politeknik Tuanku Syed Sirajuddin Perlis (Malaysia)
School of Languages, Civilization and Philosophy Universiti Utara Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500511
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 7596-7609
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-07
Accepted: 2026-05-12
Published: 2026-06-05
Abstract
This study examines undergraduate students’ perceptions of teaching, social, and cognitive presence in online learning environments, grounded in the Community of Inquiry framework (Randy Garrison & Jennifer Arbaugh, 2007). Despite extensive research on these constructs, limited attention has been given to how learners perceive their interrelationships within online contexts.A quantitative design was employed with a purposive sample of 239 undergraduates. Data were collected through an online questionnaire comprising four sections: demographic information, and measures of teaching presence (13 items), social presence (9 items), and cognitive presence (12 items). Responses were recorded using a five-point Likert scale ranging from “Never” to “Always.” Descriptive statistics were used to determine perceived levels of each presence, while Pearson correlation analysis examined relationships among the constructs. Findings indicate that all three presences were perceived at moderate to high levels. Strong positive correlations were found between social and teaching presence (r = .754, p < .001), teaching and cognitive presence (r = .779, p < .001), and social and cognitive presence (r = .804, p < .001), indicating a high degree of interdependence. These results support the view that teaching, social, and cognitive presence function as an integrated system in online learning. The study provides empirical support for the CoI framework and offers practical implications for designing online environments that enhance interaction, instructional effectiveness, and cognitive engagement.
Keywords
Teaching presence, social presence, cognitive presence, online learning
Downloads
References
1. Collazos, C. A., Fardoun, H., AlSekait, D., Pereira, C. S., & Moreira, F. (2021). Designing Online Platforms Supporting Emotions and Awareness. Electronics, 10(3), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Garcia, S., et al. (2023). Teaching Presence and Learner Engagement in Online Professional Development Courses. Journal of Online Education, 10(1), 112-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Garrison, D.R. & Arbaugh, J.B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions/ Internet and Higher Education 10, pp. 157–172. Retrieved from http://reinventnet.org/moodle/pluginfile.php/1196/mod_resource/content/3/COIreview.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Harati, H., Tu, C. -H., Yen, C. -J., Liu, Y., Nasr, N. R., & Werner, J. (2025). A social learning analysis study: Social presence in online discussions’ network interactions. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 18(1), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1801.08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Jackson, S.L. (2015) Research Methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition) Boston, USA: Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Johnson, A., Smith, B., & Lee, C. (2022). The Impact of Social Presence on Student Engagement in Online Courses. Journal of Online Learning Research, 8(2), 45-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Kangwa, D., Xiulan, W., Msambwa Msafiri, M., & Fute, A. (2024). Enhanced learning engagement through teaching presence in online distance education. Distance Education, 45(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2024.2347998 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Keengwe, J., Adjei-Boateng, E., & Diteeyont, W. (2012). Facilitating active social presence and meaningful interactions in online learning. Education and Information Technologies, 18(4), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9197-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kim, M.-S. (2022). A Case Study of a Connectivism Based Lecture as an Online Teaching and Learning Course in the Digital Era. The Korean Association of General Education, 16(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2022.16.1.131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2), 196-216. https://doi. org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Plaza, L., Araujo, L., López-Ostenero, F., & Martínez-Romo, J. (2023). Automatic Recommendation of Forum Threads and Reinforcement Activities in a Data Structure and Programming Course. Applied System Innovation, 6(5), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi6050083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Rahmat,N.H., Sukimin,I., Sim,M.S., Anuar,M., & Mohandas,E.S. (2021) Online Learning Motivation and Satisfaction: A Case Study of Undergraduates vs Postgraduates. International Journal of Asian Social Science,11(2), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2021.112.88.97 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Smith, J., & Lee, D. (2021). Fostering Collaboration through Social Presence in Online Learning Environments. International Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 78-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Wang, L., & Chen, M. (2024). Enhancing Cognitive Presence through Effective Teaching Strategies in Online Discussions. Computers & Education, 30(4), 211-228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Yu, S., Kim, E., & Ku, S. (2022). Analysis of the Effect of Teaching Presence and Learning Presence on Learning Outcomes in Online Classes of 『Presentation and Discussion』. Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction, 22(14), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2022.22.14.251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Yusof, S. I. M., PHD, Ubaidullah, N. H., PHD, & Mohamed, Z., PHD. (2013). Connecting Web 2.0 to Connectivism in Supporting Students’ Learning. GATR Global Journal of Business Social Sciences Review, 1(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.35609/gjbssr.2013.1.2(14) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study