The Meritocratic Legitimacy of Social Mobility: Social Reproduction and Methodological Individualism in the Moroccan Context
Authors
Hassan II University of Casablanca (Morocco)
Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Béni Mellal (Morocco)
Mohammed Khalid Brandalise Rhazzali
University of Padua / FIDR Interuniversity Research Centre (Italy)
Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Béni Mellal (Morocco)
University of Eastern Piedmont “Amedeo Avogadro” / FIDR Interuniversity Research Centre (Italy)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800963
Subject Category: Social Mobility
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 14009-14022
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-29
Accepted: 2026-09-04
Published: 2026-09-22
Abstract
The Anderson paradox refers to the weak correlation observed between the level of educational attainment achieved and the social position ultimately occupied, independently of that of one’s parents. Based on a documentary analysis and a critical review of the French sociological literature, this article examines the persistence of this paradox through two competing explanatory paradigms. Pierre Bourdieu explains it through social reproduction, operating through the intergenerational transmission of cultural capital. Raymond Boudon explains it through the aggregation of rational individual choices, which collectively produce substantial inequality of educational opportunities. Daniel Bertaux’s earlier contribution, which distinguishes between structural mobility and net mobility, sheds light on the genesis of this opposition. A theoretical framework developed from Weber and Rosanvallon then makes it possible to recast this debate as an issue of political legitimacy specific to systems founded on the promise of meritocracy. These two paradigms are finally confronted with recent empirical evidence from Morocco, where social origin continues to shape the position attained despite educational expansion. The analysis shows that Bourdieu and Boudon converge in their empirical diagnosis while differing in the institutional reforms implied by each paradigm, before identifying two common limitations: the subjective perception of downward mobility and institutional legitimation strategies.
Keywords
social mobility; Anderson paradox; social reproduction; methodological individualism; meritocracy; political legitimacy; Morocco.
Downloads
References
1. Anderson, C. A. (1961). A skeptical note on education and mobility. Dans A. H. Halsey, J. Floud, & C. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. A. Anderson (Éds.), Education, economy and society (p. 164-179). Free Press of Glencoe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Argan, D., & Gary-Bobo, R. J. (2023). Do we observe a devaluation of degrees? Revue économique, 74(2), 95-137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bertaux, D. (1969). Sur l'analyse des tables de mobilité sociale. Revue française de sociologie, 10(4), 448-490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Boudon, R. (1973). L'inégalité des chances. La mobilité sociale dans les sociétés industrielles. Armand Colin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Éditions de Minuit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1964). Les héritiers. Les étudiants et la culture. Éditions de Minuit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La reproduction. Éléments pour une théorie du système d'enseignement. Éditions de Minuit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bouvier, A. (2020). L'individualisme méthodologique au défi des critiques de la philosophie analytique récente. L'Année sociologique, 70(1), 45-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Elkhalfi, O., Chaabita, R., & Guemimi, C. (2021). Le rendement de l'enseignement supérieur par genre, cas du Maroc. African Scientific Journal, 5(3), 648-662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Gurgand, M., & Maurin, E. (2006). Démocratisation de l'enseignement secondaire et inégalités salariales en France. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 61(4), 845-859. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Haut-Commissariat au Plan. (2021). Mobilité sociale intergénérationnelle au Maroc. HCP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Housni, A., & Aoujil, A. (2026a). Mobilité éducative intergénérationnelle et origine sociale au Maroc : enseignements de l'ENCDM 2014. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Housni, A., & Aoujil, A. (2026b). Origine sociale, éducation et mobilité professionnelle au Maroc : une analyse du triangle OED. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry. Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Kurer, T., & Van Staalduinen, B. (2022). Disappointed expectations, downward mobility and electoral change. American Political Science Review, 116(4), 1340-1356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Lahire, B. (1998). L'homme pluriel. Les ressorts de l'action. Nathan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Melita, D., Gobel, M. S., Matamoros-Lima, J., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Willis, G. B. (2026). Prospects of downward mobility cause status anxiety and life dissatisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672261451296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Pasquali, P. (2021). Héritocratie ? Les élites, les grandes écoles et les mésaventures du mérite (1870-2020). La Découverte. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Peugny, C. (2006). La mobilité sociale descendante et ses conséquences politiques : recomposition de l'univers de valeurs et préférence partisane. Revue française de sociologie, 47(3), 443-478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Rosanvallon, P. (2008). La légitimité démocratique. Impartialité, réflexivité, proximité. Seuil. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Rouban, L. (2024). Les ressorts cachés du vote RN. Presses de Sciences Po. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation, a theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203-232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Vermeren, P. (2002). La formation des élites marocaines et tunisiennes, des nationalistes aux islamistes (1920-2000). La Découverte. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Walker, H. A., & Cohen, B. P. (1985). Scope statements: Imperatives for evaluating theory. American Sociological Review, 50(3), 288-301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Weber, M. (1995). Économie et société, tome 1. Les catégories de la sociologie (J. Freund et al., trad.). Plon. (Ouvrage original publié en 1921) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Young, M. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy, 1870-2033. Thames and Hudson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]