Research on the Impact of Multisensory Experience Based Coffee Shop Space Design on User Stickiness

Authors

Wang Bo

l of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Hubei (China)

Lilian Lee Shiau Gee

Faculty of Academy of Arts & Creative Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300231

Subject Category: Civil Engineering

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 3125-3137

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-11

Accepted: 2026-03-17

Published: 2026-04-02

Abstract

In the experience economy, coffee shops have evolved into urban “third spaces” where consumers seek not only functional services but also immersive, emotionally engaging experiences. This study investigates the impact of multisensory spatial design—encompassing visual, auditory, olfactory, and tactile elements—on user stickiness in coffee shop environments. Data were collected from 328 urban coffee shop users in China and analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results indicate that multisensory experiences significantly enhance user stickiness, including longer dwell time, higher revisit intentions, and stronger emotional attachment to the space. The findings highlight the importance of integrating multiple sensory dimensions in spatial design to improve user engagement and loyalty. The study contributes to both theory and practice by bridging environmental psychology, experience economy, and spatial design research, offering actionable insights for designing more engaging and user-centered coffee shop environments.

Keywords

Multisensory experience; coffee shop; spatial design; user stickiness

Downloads

References

1. Aslan, H., & Bekar, A. (2026). The effect of glamping tourism experience on subjective well-being, emotions, satisfaction and loyalty: experience economy theory. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 43(1), 133-153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chan, I. C. C., Chen, Z., & Guo, J. (2024). Exploring the influence of soundscape on visitors’ emotional experience and stickiness to attractions. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 29(4), 399-413. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chang, C.-H., Wei, C.-C., Lien, W.-C., Lhotská, L., Cernohorsky, J., & Lin, Y.-C. (2025). How does it affect the willingness to continue rehabilitation training? A usability evaluation of a multi-sensory rehabilitation interactive game system (MRIGS) for older adults with mild dementia. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 197, 111020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Choi, E. S., & Kang, Y. (2024). A multi-sensory kiosk interface to familiarize users with new foods. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 8(1), 1-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Di Stefano, N., & Spence, C. (2022). Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(7), 2087-2114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Flores‐Gómez, P. A., Pérez‐Villarreal, H. H., Martínez‐Ruiz, M. P., & Pick, D. (2025). The evolution of the experience economy in 25 years: Conceptual shifts, emerging themes, and future directions (1998–2023). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(6), e70135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Globa, A., Beza, B. B., & Wang, R. (2022). Towards multi-sensory design: Placemaking through immersive environments–Evaluation of the approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 204, 117614. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gou, B., Chen, X., Wang, S., Zhang, H., Wong, C. U. I., Zhao, R., & Wu, X. (2025). Artistic Perspectives on Display Design and Service Environments as Purchase Stimuli: Evidence from Millennials in the Improved Housing Market. Buildings, 15(17), 3189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Haktanir, M., & Gullu, E. (2024). Place attachment in coffee shops: a customer perspective study in North Cyprus. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(1), 312-328. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Huang, T.-L., & Chung, H. F. (2024). Impact of delightful somatosensory augmented reality experience on online consumer stickiness intention. Journal of research in interactive marketing, 18(1), 6-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kour, G., & Chhabria, B. (2022). Understanding platform strategies for consumer stickiness on OTT platforms. Journal of Indian Business Research, 14(4), 540-555. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Krishna, A., Luangrath, A. W., & Peck, J. (2024). A review of touch research in consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(2), 359-381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kwame Opoku, E., Tham, A., Morrison, A. M., & Wang, M.-j. S. (2023). An exploratory study of the experiencescape dimensions and customer revisit intentions for specialty urban coffee shops. British food journal, 125(5), 1613-1630. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lee, I.-S., Kang, J.-H., & Kim, J. (2024). Auditory influence on stickiness perception: an fMRI study of multisensory integration. NeuroReport, 35(4), 269-276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Li, L., Wang, S., Mansor, N., Azmi, A., & Xiang, J. (2025). Evaluating trends in interior design strategies and their impact on the emotional experience of older adults. Buildings, 15(2), 249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Empirical study on the factors affecting user stickiness of online visual art platform from the perspective of user experience. IEEE Access, 11, 60763-60776. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Münster, M. B. (2024). Adaptive reuse: Atmospherics in buildings repurposed as coffee shops. Sustainability, 16(4), 1585. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nisa, A., Widhiasti, M. R., & Dewi, E. P. (2022). Indoor to outdoor: Transformation of coffee shops in Jakarta. International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research, 6(1), 17-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Paull, J. (2024). The Impact of Coffee Shops on Aceh's Economic Sustainability. Journal of Aceh Studies, 1(1), 41-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Periaiya, S., & Nandukrishna, A. T. (2024). What drives user stickiness and satisfaction in OTT video streaming platforms? A mixed-method exploration. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(9), 2326-2342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Qu, Y., Cieślik, A., Fang, S., & Qing, Y. (2023). The role of online interaction in user stickiness of social commerce: The shopping value perspective. Digital Business, 3(2), 100061. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. ŞAHİN, S. K., & ARTUĞER, S. (2023). Coffeescape: A scale for measuring coffee shops atmospherics. Journal Of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 11(1), 144-160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Shen, L., Zhang, Y., Fan, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Improving consumer stickiness in livestream e-commerce: A mixed-methods study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 962786. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Spence, C. (2022). Experimental atmospherics: a multi-sensory perspective. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 25(5), 662-673. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Stead, S., Wetzels, R., Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Mahr, D. (2022). Toward multisensory customer experiences: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric review and future research directions. Journal of Service Research, 25(3), 440-459. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. T. Ajith, N., P, S., & Mathew, L. S. (2025). Experience matters: Exploring the impact of user experience on stickiness and loyalty in OTT platforms. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(18), 11363-11377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Tao, S., & Kim, H.-S. (2022). Online customer reviews: insights from the coffee shops industry and the moderating effect of business types. Tourism Review, 77(5), 1349-1364. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Teng, X., & Bao, Z. (2022). Factors affecting users’ stickiness of fitness apps: an empirical study based on the SOR perspective. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 23(4), 823-840. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wu, R., Gao, L., Li, J., Xie, A., & Zhang, X. (2025). Exploring key factors influencing the processual experience of visitors in metaverse museum exhibitions: an approach based on the experience economy and the SOR model. Electronics, 14(15), 3045. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Xu, H., Zhao, J., Jin, C., Zhu, N., & Chai, Y. (2025). Research on the multi-sensory experience design of interior spaces from the perspective of spatial perception: a case study of suzhou coffee roasting factory. Buildings, 15(8), 1393. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Xu, Z., Chang, J., Cheng, F., Liu, X., Yao, T., Hu, K., & Sun, J. (2024). Examining the impact of the built environment on multidimensional urban vitality: Using milk tea shops and coffee shops as new indicators of urban vitality. Buildings, 14(11), 3517. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhou, J., Zhou, Y., & Li, D. (2024). Exploring the complex mechanism of the influence of a multisensory tourism experience on tourists’ mental restoration in the research context of historical and cultural blocks. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(16), 2682-2702. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles