Research Skills of Ste Students through Cognitive Apprenticeship Strategy

Authors

Uzziel C. Toldo

Graduate Students, College of Education, Central Mindanao University, Philippines (Philippines)

Lalaine G. Sariana

Faculty, College of Education, Central Mindanao University, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400470

Subject Category: Science Education

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 6567-6575

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-23

Accepted: 2026-04-28

Published: 2026-05-14

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of the Cognitive Apprenticeship Strategy (CAS) in improving the research skills of Grade 8 Science, Technology, and Engineering (STE) students at Impasugong National High School. Specifically, it assessed students’ competencies in objective formulation, literature review writing, and methodology development before and after the intervention, and explored their learning experiences to complement the quantitative findings. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed, integrating a one-group pretest–posttest approach with semi-structured interviews. The quantitative phase utilized a researcher-made scenario-based assessment evaluated through a validated rubric with high inter-rater reliability, while qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results revealed that prior to CAS implementation, students demonstrated generally low to developing research skills, with difficulties in formulating clear objectives, selecting and synthesizing literature, and organizing research methodologies. After the intervention, students showed significant improvement across all domains, reaching proficient to highly proficient levels, with methodology development obtaining the highest post-test performance. Paired-sample t-test results confirmed statistically significant gains in all areas (p = .000), while Cohen’s d values indicated very large effect sizes, demonstrating strong practical significance. Qualitative findings supported these results, highlighting that modeling, scaffolding, coaching, and guided practice helped students better understand research processes. However, some learners still expressed limited confidence in independent research writing. Overall, CAS was found to be an effective instructional strategy in enhancing students’ research competencies. The study concludes that structured and scaffolded instruction significantly improves research skill development among STE learners. It recommends the integration of CAS into science instruction to strengthen research literacy and higher-order thinking skills in secondary education.

Keywords

Cognitive Apprenticeship Strategy, research skills, STE students, sequential explanatory mixed-methods

Downloads

References

1. Ahmed, M., Ibrahim, S., & Yousif, A. (2025). Cognitive apprenticeship and higher-order thinking skills: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 15(2), 110–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ca‑alim, M. A. A. (2021). Research competencies of senior high school STEM learners (Unpublished thesis). West Visayas State University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cuayzon, P. R. (2024). Research skill proficiency of senior high STEM students in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Educational Innovation, 11(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. De La Paz, S., Butler, A., Levin, J., & Felton, M. (2022). Cognitive apprenticeship in secondary science: Improving disciplinary writing and argumentation skills. International Journal of Science Education, 44(7), 1023–1045. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Education. (2016). K–12 curriculum guide: Science, Grades 7–10. Republic of the Philippines, DepEd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Education. (2019). Science, Technology, and Engineering (STE) program guide. Republic of the Philippines, DepEd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Freitas, R., Pedro, C., Dorotea, R., & Galego, M. (2023). Scaffolding research skills in secondary education: A local perspective. Philippine Educational Review, 7(2), 78–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hilary, M., Hohmeier, K., & Spivey, C. (2022). Cognitive apprenticeship in health sciences: Enhancing literature review and research competencies. Journal of Health Professions Education, 10(1), 33–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lagulos, R. (2025). Enhancing research competencies through guided inquiry in Filipino STE students. Mindanao Education Journal, 12(1), 22–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Linh, T. H. (2024). The use of scenario‑based assessment in assessing students’ collaborative problem‑solving skills. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(11), 45–60. https://ijern.com/journal/2024/November‑2024/09.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Matsuo, M., & Tsukube, T. (2020). Cognitive apprenticeship and higher-order skills in education. International Journal of Management Education, 18(3), Article 100417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mindanao State University. (2023). Evaluation of the STE Program responsiveness in junior high schools. MSU Research Publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tabafa, A. M., & Sariana, L. G. (2025). Students’ attitudes and research skill development in Junior High STE learners. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 55–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zhang, M., van Rijn, P., Deane, P., & Bennett, R. (2019). Scenario‑based assessments in writing: An experimental study. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330425908 Educational_Assessment_Scenario‑Based_Assessments_in_Writing_An_Experimental_Study [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles